similar to: [fdo] PSA: Google dropping a lot of list email

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:14?AM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote: > The mail admins can choose what is covered by the DKIM signature. > In the case of barclays.com there are various headers (which I think > make it through the mailing list untouched) but also the body, which > does not; a footer with the list URL is added. The real issue here is that the Mailman

On 2024-07-20 at 16:30 -0400, James Ralston wrote: > The real issue here is that the Mailman configuration for the > openssh-unix-dev list does not appear to set > `dmarc_moderation_action` > (in `Privacy options` - `Sender filters`) to either `Munge From` or > `Wrap Message`, which is necessary for lists where ... "Necessary" if the client machines re going to penalize

[sorry off-topic, ignore if uninterested in dmarc/dkim/mail filters] On 2024/07/17 22:14, mark.yagnatinsky at barclays.com wrote: > I don't know enough about DMARC to make any sense of what you just said... actually wait, maybe I get it. > You're saying that email sent that I send to the list will land in your inbox with my address in the From header. > But the recipient mail

( previous thread at http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-January/023050.html ) > > <info from="web interface mailman" extra_from="backend mailinglist software"> > dmarc_moderation_action Option > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > >

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:59 AM, G?k?en Eraslan <gokcen.eraslan at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > But "Watch" only notifies when there are new pull requests and issues, > which doesn't make sense for the r-source repository. Following Github Atom > feed[1] sounds better, however the feed only provides commit messages not > the diffs. > Right, sorry, I

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the "from_is_list Wrap Message" transformation > > to these messages. > > > > from_is_list

Does vorbis have any niches of technical superiority over opus? Or is compatibility with older hard- and software the only benfit? Put another way, is there any reason to prefer vorbis over opus for music on new sortware or platforms? -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

>>>>> "JC" == Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> writes: JC> I disagree that it makes it worthless for a large number of JC> users. It's only within the last few days that a few people have run JC> into this particular issue where they have a public IP address that is JC> changing a lot and PJSIP does not support changing it without a JC> restart.

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:53 PM, John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog19 at eaglescrag.net> wrote: > On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote:

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the

On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >>>>>> [ ... Failed to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2695 Bug ID: 2695 Summary: inconsistent outout of "ssh.add -l" between ed25519 and rsa keys Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component:

Dear All, Is there anyone who is having FastAGI support for C & C++? We do have FastAGI working for the JAVA and rest of the language / script. But I am unable to find FastAGI for C/C++. Please let us know how to write FastAGI using C/C++. Thanks in Advance, Kashyap -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Did we work out the technical reason why some users that post to the list are getting dumped into gmail spam? Ta, Andrew

I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> So, if your mail hosting provider enforces dmarc,(gmail does) and you >> get mail from a list that doesn't rewrite the headers, and people >> from places like yahoo post to the list,

On 06/17/2018 09:11 AM, Alice Wonder via CentOS wrote: > On 06/17/2018 08:52 AM, Michael Hennebry via CentOS wrote: >> I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> >>>> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >>>> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >>>> So, if your mail hosting provider

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

>>>>> "DC" == D'Arcy Cain <darcy at VybeNetworks.com> writes: DC> Perhaps someone can explain what t38timeout is supposed to do A 'git grep t38timeout' on the src leads one to res/res_fax.c, where one case see that it is the number of miliseconds to permit for t38 negotiation to complete once it starts. Ie after both sides select t38, until they