similar to: [PATCH 00/12] Bunch of patches for cross-compilatio + RP4

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64 Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u3 Debian 8.2 installed on a supermicro H8SGL Board, AMD 6128 with 4x4GB ECC RAM. When booting the plain kernel (stock Jessie 3.16 or backport 4.1 or 4.3), both memory controllers (mc0 and mc1) appear under /sys/devices/system/edac/mc with two csrow* each as expected. Same happens, when booted with Xen 4.1.4-3+deb7u1. When booted with Xen

Package: src:xen Version: 4.17.0+46-gaaf74a532c-1 Severity: important Two major bugs have shown with the release of new hardware from AMD. Since the new hardware is likely to become common during the life of Debian/bookworm, you may wish to grab them early: ad15a0a8ca2515d8ac58edfc0bc1d3719219cb77 x86/time: prevent overflow with high frequency TSCs Turns out the latest generation is fast enough

Fewer fork()s and execve()s quickly add up to significant savings. I'm concerned Debian is slowly headed towards recreating SunOS^WSolaris 5.7^W2.7^W7 and the layers and layers of scripts which killed performance. As these runtime scripts are heavily used, avoid all uses of external programs by them. Signed-off-by: Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian at m5p.com> --- The gains from this

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:02:53AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.05.17 at 00:36, <ehem+debian at m5p.com> wrote: > > I haven't yet done as much experimentation as Andreas Pflug has, but I > > can confirm I'm also running into this bug with Xen 4.4.1. > > > > I've only tried Linux kernel 3.16.43, but as Dom0: > > > > EDAC

I haven't yet done as much experimentation as Andreas Pflug has, but I can confirm I'm also running into this bug with Xen 4.4.1. I've only tried Linux kernel 3.16.43, but as Dom0: EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0 AMD64 EDAC driver v3.4.0 EDAC amd64: DRAM ECC enabled. EDAC amd64: NB MCE bank disabled, set MSR 0x0000017b[4] on node 0 to enable. EDAC amd64: ECC disabled in the BIOS or no ECC

Package: src:xen Version: 4.14.1+11-gb0b734a8b3-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss X-Debbugs-Cc: debianbts at virtualzone.hu Dear Maintainer, after a clean install of bullseye/testing the xen dmesg shows the following message: (XEN) AMD-Vi: IO_PAGE_FAULT: 0000:01:00.1 d0 addr fffffffdf8000000 flags 0x8 I this is the sata device: 01:00.1 SATA controller: Advanced Micro

Elliott Mitchell writes ("[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes.""): > This partially reverts commit 16504669c5cbb8b195d20412aadc838da5c428f7. Wow, that is an upsteam commit from 2005. However, I would like some kind of explanation. Is it in fact now false that | # These don't cross-compile ? Should this patch go upstream ? Ian. -- Ian Jackson

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: wishlist The "xendomains" init script will start domains according to the order of config files found in /etc/xen/auto/*. I use this so that, in the event of a hard reboot, the more important domains will start first. Some of these contain essential services like DNS resolvers, slapd and so on, and since starting xen domains

Package: src:xen Version: 4.11.1-1 Currently, these are rdepends: -$ apt-cache rdepends libxenmisc4.11 libxenmisc4.11 Reverse Depends: libxen-dev xen-utils-4.11 collectd qemu-system-x86 libvirt-daemon collectd-core It's on the wishlist to start doing buster-backports for Xen. If the user has a cluster of servers and can make use of live migrate, then this allows the user to

tags 988477 - moreinfo found 988477 4.17.2+76-ge1f9cb16e2-1~deb12u1 affects 988477 src:linux severity 988477 critical quit I am also observing #988477 occur. This machine has a AMD Zen 4 processor. The first observation was when motherboard/processor was swapped out, the older motherboard/processor was several generations old. The pattern which is emerging is Linux MD RAID1 plus recent AMD

found 988477 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 severity 988477 critical quit Justification is same as original, data loss. I'm unsure about of the border between "data loss" and "serious data loss" is, but the original reportter declared it so and I don't disagree. On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:41:44PM +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > I am changing the severity

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello, I read and find a way (well, there seems to be several equal implementations) to collect the ssh keys of machines. However they all give only the choice to choose between the key formats. But is there a way to collect both keys of a machine, the rsa _and_ the dss key (and maybe the rsa1 too)? I didn''t find a way to solve this as

I've copied vorbis@xiph on this message simply because it will be interesting there, but also to give those who haven't yet subscribed to the advocacy list a taste of the things that (should) happen there. As you know we are planning to sell vorbis shirts, both to promote the vorbis format and to raise some money for the Xiph.org Foundation. I have been talking to an online retailer

Hi all, Ruby 1.8.4 Rails 1.1.2 Mongrel 0.3.12 I''m seeing this output from the Mongrel server: Client closed socket requesting file C:/eclipse/workspace/dslscheduler/public/javascripts/prototype.js: Invalid argument It seems to be harmless, but I''m curious as to what''s causing it. Any ideas? Thanks, Dan

Hi, I found the following page describing how to stream data from the server to the client: http://api.rubyonrails.com/classes/ActionController/Streaming.html I want to do the opposite, streaming data from the client to the server, letting the controller saving the data while it''s being received. In particular, I want to upload large files to the RailsDav

flight 8774 xen-4.0-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8774/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8763 test-amd64-i386-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8763 test-amd64-i386-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8763

Hello, I''m running a Rails application which must sort and manipulate a lot of data which are loaded in memory. The Rails app runs on 2 mongrel processes. When I first load the app, both are 32Mb in memory. After some days, both are between 200Mb and 300Mb. My question is : is there some kind of garbage collector in Mongrel? I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint

flight 8803 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8803/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8769 test-amd64-i386-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8769 test-amd64-i386-pair 6 xen-install/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 8769

Dear Kailas Gokhale, The negative individual variance is not a problem with your code or plm. It a property of your data. Please check the posts of Giovanni Millo on this topic: [R] R: plm random effect: the estimated variance of the individual effect is negative Millo Giovanni Giovanni_Millo at Generali.com Sat Jan 5 10:10:01 CET 2013 You can find the posts in the archive by rseek.org.

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking