Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Xen PVH support for grub-xen in Buster"
2019 Jan 05
4
Bug#776450: Xen PVH support for grub-xen in Buster
Hi Colin,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 1/5/19 8:04 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 01:02:47AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> In december, Xen PVH support has been committed in grub master:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel at gnu.org/msg28125.html
>>
>> The last pieces needed in the Linux kernel to boot PVH with grub2 landed
>>
2019 Jan 06
2
Bug#776450: Xen PVH support for grub-xen in Buster
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 01:45:53AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> Hm, so I have a PV (or PVH) domU in a test environment here, and I tried
> to use it in the Debian way of booting it.
>
> If I install grub-xen-bin inside the domU then I get some stuff, but not
> update-grub. When I just also install grub2 it drags in more stuff, and
> then I end up with update-grub and a
2019 Jan 07
2
Bug#776450: Xen PVH support for grub-xen in Buster
On 1/6/19 11:21 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 10:51:13PM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> On 1/5/19 8:04 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>>> I think I'm OK with cherry-picking the relevant patch stack. Presumably
>>> this would need to be in new grub-xen-pvh-bin / grub-xen-pvh binary
>>> packages, as is usual for separate platform builds?
2019 Jan 07
2
Bug#776450: Xen PVH support for grub-xen in Buster
On 1/7/19 2:13 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 1/7/19 12:48 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> [...]
>
>> Would you mind trying out the temporary pvh branch of
>> https://salsa.debian.org/grub-team/grub ? I'd like to know whether the
>> resulting grub-xen-host binary package does the right thing, when built
>> in the ordinary way (I've test-built this
2019 Jan 07
2
Bug#776450: Xen PVH support for grub-xen in Buster
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:44:50AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:58:19AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > Ok great. Since I'm not using (and probably not going to use) the
> > multi-stage multiboot things, this is harder for me to help with.
>
> With any luck I should be able to work that bit out myself, since I
> think stable's Xen
2013 Nov 14
3
How to use PVH mode in xen
Hi,
I'm instresting with the PVH mode, is there any wiki available to boot up a PVH guest?
I used the following source code to compile the xen and dom0.
I have tried adding pvh=1 in xl.cfg file as pv mode, but guest still uses qemu device model.
This patch series can also be pulled from this git tree:
git://xenbits.xen.org/people/gdunlap/xen.git out/pvh-v15
The kernel code for PVH guests
2018 Mar 13
1
Xen PVH Support in libvirt
Hello @ all,
i wonder if there is any support for Xen PVH (https://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Software_Overview) within libvirt.
If i parse a xen native domU config file with 'virsh domxml-from-native' in which i set type='pvh' it changes it in the libvirt xml output to normal pv.
Also the docs of libvirt do not state something like pvh.
I am currently running Xen 4.10.0 with
2013 Dec 13
4
Xen 4.4 development update: Is PVH a blocker?
This information will be mirrored on the Xen 4.4 Roadmap wiki page:
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap/4.4
Our timeline had us start the code freeze last Friday. However, we
have not released an RC0 because we have been waiting for PVH dom0
support. Adding bug fixes during RCs makes sense, but RC0 should
contain all of the functionality we expect to be in the final release.
PVH dom0 support
2013 Oct 21
5
I/O port access handling for PVH
George,
since you asked on Friday, I though about the situation some more
over the weekend.
On PV, the requirement to trap all INs and OUTs is a result from us
needing the enforce two levels of restrictions - Xen''s and the guest
kernel''s. I.e. we can''t make use of the hardware''s access control
mechanisms, as we can''t put two I/O bit maps in place, and
2013 Nov 18
6
[PATCH RFC v2] pvh: clearly specify used parameters in vcpu_guest_context
The aim of this patch is to define a stable way in which PVH is
going to do AP bringup.
Since we are running inside of a HVM container, PVH should only need
to set flags, cr3 and user_regs in order to bring up a vCPU, the rest
can be set once the vCPU is started using the bare metal methods.
Additionally, the guest can also set cr0 and cr4, and those values
will be appended to the default values
2013 Jan 28
16
PVH questions
Hello,
I''ve had a look at PVH support, and I have a few questions:
- events are still dispatched the PV way through the callback, right?
- I guess FPU errors don''t trigger an INT13, so I don''t need to handle
that?
- How about the console and store MFNs from the boot info? Are they
still MFNs, or actually PFNs?
- How about PV network in non-copy mode? It used to be
2013 Jan 30
2
[PATCH] PVH: remove code to map iomem from guest
It was decided during xen patch review that xen map the iomem
transparently, so remove xen_set_clr_mmio_pvh_pte() and the sub
hypercall PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem.
---
arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 14 --------------
arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
include/xen/interface/physdev.h | 10 ----------
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git
2013 Dec 12
10
[PATCH 0/4] Turn-key PV-GRUB2 installation
This patch set should make it easier to maintain PV-GRUB2 installations.
The general idea is based on discussions I had with Xen developers
(mainly Ian Jackson) at the Ubuntu Developer Summit in May 2011; though
I never did manage to get the core port done and Vladimir beat me to
that, I think the configuration approach we discussed there is still
valid and useful.
The idea here is that people
2019 Mar 07
4
Xen-kernel: Update to 4.14 or 4.19?
Hey all,
We've been on 4.9 for some time now, and while it's still supported, I
think it's time to start thinking about upgrading, and I'd like input
from the community about which version to move up to.
4.19 has been out for almost 5 months now. It will include PVH domU
support, and PVH dom0 support in what _is believed_ to be the final
form; so when the Virt SIG moves to a
2019 Mar 07
2
Xen-kernel: Update to 4.14 or 4.19?
On 3/7/19 10:30 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:42 AM George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We've been on 4.9 for some time now, and while it's still supported, I
>> think it's time to start thinking about upgrading, and I'd like input
>> from the community about which version to move up to.
2013 Jan 19
21
[PATCH]: PVH: specify xen features strings cleany for PVH
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:22:47 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> Jan had some comments about that patch:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1745041/
>
> Please fix it up so I can put it in the Linux tree.
Please see below.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Mukesh
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S
2009 Jun 16
3
How to extract all rows that contain the value of X in any column?
Hi R-helpers,
I'm trying to use this code
> pvh_dnv<-pvh[sapply(pvh=="dnv"),]
to make a new dataframe containing the rows from pvh that contain the
value of "dnv" in ANY column.
But, it's not working. I get this error
Error in match.fun(FUN) : element 1 is empty;
the part of the args list of 'is.function' being evaluated was:
(FUN)
which, to
2013 Sep 23
57
[PATCH RFC v13 00/20] Introduce PVH domU support
This patch series is a reworking of a series developed by Mukesh
Rathor at Oracle. The entirety of the design and development was done
by him; I have only reworked, reorganized, and simplified things in a
way that I think makes more sense. The vast majority of the credit
for this effort therefore goes to him. This version is labelled v13
because it is based on his most recent series, v11.
2013 Dec 13
0
[PATCH V10 10/14] xen/pvh: specify xen features strings cleanly for PVH
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Use .ascii and .asciz to define xen feature string. Note, the PVH
string must be in a single line (not multiple lines with \) to keep the
assembler from putting null char after each string before \.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
2013 Oct 28
5
FreeBSD PVH guest support
Hello,
The Xen community is working on a new virtualization mode (or maybe I
should say an extension of HVM) to be able to run PV guests inside HVM
containers without requiring a device-model (Qemu). One of the
advantages of this new virtualization mode is that now it is much more
easier to port guests to run under it (as compared to pure PV guests).
Given that FreeBSD already supports