similar to: Bug#810964: [BUG] EDAC infomation partially missing

Am 21.01.16 um 17:41 schrieb Jan Beulich: >>>> On 20.01.16 at 16:01, <andreas.pflug at web.de> wrote: >> Initially reported to debian >> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810964), redirected here: >> >> With AMD Opteron 6xxx processors, half of the memory controllers are >> missing from /sys/devices/system/edac/mc >> Checked

I haven't yet done as much experimentation as Andreas Pflug has, but I can confirm I'm also running into this bug with Xen 4.4.1. I've only tried Linux kernel 3.16.43, but as Dom0: EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0 AMD64 EDAC driver v3.4.0 EDAC amd64: DRAM ECC enabled. EDAC amd64: NB MCE bank disabled, set MSR 0x0000017b[4] on node 0 to enable. EDAC amd64: ECC disabled in the BIOS or no ECC

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64 Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u3 Debian 8.2 installed on a supermicro H8SGL Board, AMD 6128 with 4x4GB ECC RAM. When booting the plain kernel (stock Jessie 3.16 or backport 4.1 or 4.3), both memory controllers (mc0 and mc1) appear under /sys/devices/system/edac/mc with two csrow* each as expected. Same happens, when booted with Xen 4.1.4-3+deb7u1. When booted with Xen

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:02:53AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.05.17 at 00:36, <ehem+debian at m5p.com> wrote: > > I haven't yet done as much experimentation as Andreas Pflug has, but I > > can confirm I'm also running into this bug with Xen 4.4.1. > > > > I've only tried Linux kernel 3.16.43, but as Dom0: > > > > EDAC

>>> On 20.01.16 at 16:01, <andreas.pflug at web.de> wrote: > Initially reported to debian > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810964), redirected here: > > With AMD Opteron 6xxx processors, half of the memory controllers are > missing from /sys/devices/system/edac/mc > Checked with single 6120 (dual memory controller) and twin 6344 (2x dual >

>>> On 22.01.16 at 10:09, <pgadmin at pse-consulting.de> wrote: > When booting with Xen 4.4.1: > > AMD64 EDAC driver v3.4.0 > EDAC amd64: DRAM ECC enabled. > EDAC amd64: NB MCE bank disabled, set MSR 0x0000017b[4] on node 0 to enable. I wonder how valid his message is. We actually write this MSR with all ones during boot. However, considering involved functions

This morning between 07:10 or so and 08:10 I discovered that my PC had shut itself off. I thought it was due to a power failure becuase I never turn it off without a good reason, and it had been running (and playing sounds) until it wasn't. My roommate/landlord tells me that the only anomaly he observed was that our router had lost its internet connection (via a cable modem, which was still

Dear CentOS community, Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE

Hello, I upgraded to CentOS 5.1 and everything went smoothly (Thanks for the awesome work!). But after rebooting, I get the following error: EDAC MC: Ver: 2.0.1 Nov 30 2007 EDAC e7xxx: error reporting device not found:vendor 8086 device 0x2541 (broken BIOS?) I found http://edacbugs.buttersideup.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21 with google but no solution. Is it safe to ignore the error or remove

In order to support ZFS, we upgraded a backups server with a new, ECC motherboard. We're running CentOS 6 with ZFS on Linux, recently patched. Now, I want to enable EDAC so we can check for memory errors (and maybe PCI errors as well) but so far, repeatedly pounding on the Google hasn't yielded exactly what I need to do to enable EDAC. One howto was covering PCI and edac, but

Hi List, We had the following error thrown on console on a PowerEdge server running CentOS 5 (64 bit). Googling around didn't yield any particular insights. The server crashed a few minutes after this message. Running memtester, just to check, didn't find anything; and the box has been running for months before this without issue. I'm wondering if anyone has run across this

I've got a production system running CentOS 4 that was rock solid until I upgraded from 2.6.9-55 to 2.6.9-78.0.13 (now running 2.6.9-89.0.11). The system now crashes intermittently after a few weeks. I finally caught the panic message : EDAC MC0: INTERNAL ERROR: channel-b out of range (4 >= 4) Kernel panic - not syncing: MC0: Uncorrected Error Looking at the kernel changelog, I see that

What does the following EDAC problem means? The machine is a AMD 64bit box running Centos 5. It looks like some problems aroung AMD DRAM Memory controller. But what does it really mean b/c most of my AMD boxes has these messages in /var/log/messages. Please help. ... Aug 1 23:29:40 ccn128 kernel: EDAC MC: Ver: 2.0.1 Jun 12 2007 Aug 1 23:29:40 ccn128 kernel: EDAC MC0: Giving out device to

After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get a lot of this error into /var/log/messages: > May??3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label > "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=2 RDWR=Read RAS=6093 CAS=896, CE Err=0x10000 > (Correctable Patrol Data ECC)) > May??3 11:27:21 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label > "":

Hi All, We have installed CentOS 5.3 x86_64 in an HP DL585 server with AMD Opteron 64 bit processor and 16 GB RAM. The kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 . Now this has thrown an error message in /var/log/message, Jul 3 21:41:11 db1 kernel: EDAC k8 MC0: general bus error: participating processor(local node origin), time-out(no timeout) memory transaction type(generic read), mem or i/o(mem

From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting early acks. clang has a number of useful, new warnings see

From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting early acks. clang has a number of useful, new warnings see

Hello! I'm having problems getting PCI pass-through to work. This is on a AMD64 system, paravirtualized with xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.0-1~experimental.1, dom0: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-12. From IRC, earlier today: <tschwinge> waldi: Aren't the Debian xen domU-capable kernels supposed to contain the PCI frontend (needed for PCI pass-through)? I'm getting:

Hello! I'm having problems getting PCI pass-through to work. This is on a AMD64 system, paravirtualized with xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.0-1~experimental.1, dom0: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-12. From IRC, earlier today: <tschwinge> waldi: Aren't the Debian xen domU-capable kernels supposed to contain the PCI frontend (needed for PCI pass-through)? I'm getting:

Hi, #working directory data1 #changed name data to data1.? Added some files in each of sub directories a1, a2, etc. ?indx1<- indx[indx!=""] lapply(indx1,function(x) list.files(x)) #[[1]] #[1] "a1.txt"??????? "mmmmm11kk.txt" #[[2]] #[1] "a2.txt"??????? "mmmmm11kk.txt" #[[3]] #[1] "a3.txt"??????? "mmmmm11kk.txt" #[[4]] #[1]