similar to: reset "replace battery" flag

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 9/21/20 9:47 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >> We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to the data returned by the >> usbhid-ups driver, it seems to be a "badge engineered" Eaton 5PX >> UPS LI R 3000. >> We have a stubborn "Replace Battery" alarm that stays (...): >> The

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:47:42PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 9/25/20 1:36 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >>> On 9/21/20 9:47 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >>> We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to the data returned by >>> the usbhid-ups driver, it seems to be a "badge

On 9/25/20 1:36 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> On 9/21/20 9:47 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >>> We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to the data returned by the >>> usbhid-ups driver, it seems to be a "badge engineered" Eaton 5PX >>> UPS LI R 3000. >>> We have a

On 9/21/20 9:47 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: > Hi, > > We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to the data returned by the > usbhid-ups driver, it seems to be a "badge engineered" Eaton 5PX UPS > LI R 3000. > > We have a stubborn "Replace Battery" alarm that stays despite: > > - physical battery replacement > - successful quick battery test,

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:32:36PM +0200, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:47:42PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> On 9/25/20 1:36 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >>>> On 9/21/20 9:47 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >>>> We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:28:46AM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > The upsd daemon keeps an image of the current state of the UPS unit > in memory. There is no external database. The monitor daemon upsmon > polls this image. So I understand that restarting upsd is guaranteed to reset that image.

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: > We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to the data returned by the > usbhid-ups driver, it seems to be a "badge engineered" Eaton 5PX UPS > LI R 3000. > > We have a stubborn "Replace Battery" alarm that stays despite: > ... > The panel doesn't show any battery-related alarm. > > I initially

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=490 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Did you look at the server logs as suggested by the logfile? Aki > On 13 November 2018 at 18:52 Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel at mamane.lu> wrote: > > > And the Sieve script: > > ------- start sieve script --------- > require ["vnd.dovecot.execute", "fileinto", "mailbox", "vnd.dovecot.debug"]; > > debug_log "about to

Hi, Running dovecot 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) on Debian GNU/Linux stable (version 9.6), I'm trying to use the execute command in a sieve script, with direct execution (not service socket). The script is executed, and returns (the process exits), but the dovecot-lda process seems to not notice, and thinks the script did not terminate. After sieve_execute_exec_timeout has passed, it sends a TERM, a bit

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.4.2-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch xen-version does not include the "extra" component, only major.minor. This keeps makes /etc/init.d/xend bail out with xen 3.2-1 from lenny. patch attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (600, 'stable'), (500,

I noticed a mail stuck in my mail queue. dovecot-lda was returning error 64 Invalid parameter given. (EX_USAGE). Weird, weird, weird. After some sleuthing, I found the sender address was FirstLast at domain.tld, with a UTF8-encoded Unicode U+FEFF ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE character (AKA byte order mark) between "First" and "Last" :) Since that is passed as the -f parameter to

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable (Grave because dash is the default /bin/sh) With dash 0.5.5.1-7.4 as /bin/sh, /usr/sbin/xm enters an infinite loop of reexcuting itself. When run with bash, it works correctly. I traced that to /usr/lib/xen-common/bin/xen-toolstack; here's the diff between "/bin/sh -x /usr/sbin/xm"

Hi Aki, Am 21.02.19 um 12:55 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > > On 21.2.2019 13.47, Lionel Elie Mamane via dovecot wrote: >> I noticed a mail stuck in my mail queue. dovecot-lda was returning >> error 64 Invalid parameter given. (EX_USAGE). >> >> Weird, weird, weird. After some sleuthing, I found the sender address >> was FirstLast at domain.tld, with a UTF8-encoded

Is there an effort to produce a wine certification? A badge/sticker that can be placed on a product to say "also runs on Linux using wine" Or perhaps, where the OS badges are placed a little tux and glass of wine. This would give companies an easy way to get there app running on Linux and provide a reason for them to contribute to Wine. Perhaps more important even than the badge would

Hi there, yesterday I came across the "Vocera Communication Badge" and now I'd like to know if anyone here has played with that thing (or even just seen it in real life), and if a price tag can be found for this device? Too bad they don't use SIP... ;-( http://www.vocera.com/ http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/tol-25.12.03-001/ Cheers, Philipp ** Wireless Specifications

There may have been a topic like this already, but I tried all the search terms I could think of and didn't come up with anything. Apologies if this has been answered before. Is there a badges that makers of Windows software can put on their site that show the WINE compatibility rating with their software? I just had a mental image of people putting a badge with a link to their

>> why not just point them at a hosting service like google apps, and let google keep things up to date? Costs money, and also the problem is that gmail imposes heavy spam filters and "reputation blocks" meaning smaller providers with low email volumes, are put in the spam folder, even if they never send spam, just because their email volume is so low (ergo, they must prove they

Dear R-devel, I found this behavior disturbing, if `1 + f()` is called, `sys.call()` called inside of `f` will return a quoted `f()` with a "srcref" that prints "1 + f()". I don't know which one is good but I don't think they can be correct at the same time. Here's a reproducible example: f <- function(){ sc <- sys.call() print(sc) attr(sc,

> On 26 Jun 2019, at 17:25, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > R-Forge is mirrored on Github; see https://github.com/rforge/ecdat, for example. That shows 418 commits in its history; presumably that's the full R-forge history. I think that's newer than Michael Friendly's gist. > > So I suspect (but haven't tried to do this) that