similar to: 20050419-flash 2004MX

I just installed wine-20050419 and it's great so far. Dreamweaver works, office2000 works, Adobe photoshop and InDesign 3.0 work great. However both Contribute3.0 and FlashMX do not work. They both have a common error. Flash: fixme:actctx:CreateActCtxW stub! Contribute offers a few more: fixme:win:User32InitializeImmEntryTable (0x19650412): stub fixme:actctx:CreateActCtxW stub!

Hi, I downloaded flash.exe from macromedia site and tried to install with wine but doesnt work. The installer says that is extracting the files, and when finishes my shell returns me this message fixme:ole:ITypeInfo_fnRelease destroy child objects and stads on it, dont change...and dont appear nothing more...plz help me :D I'm using the latest wine version Thnx for all help.

Hi, In a completely clean account that's never run Wine before I run wine --version. Wine installs a new .wine directory but this Wine directory has no config file. I looked in the 3 obvious files but none of them seem to have an option for changing between OSS, Alsa and JAck. where do I make this setting change now? Thanks, Mark

UT2004 runs nearly flawlessly under Wine, and is about 10,000 times easier to install than its Linux counterpart. The only problem I'm having is running it full screen. What's the command for that? For example, is it something like: $wine UT2004.exe --full-screen I know --full-screen is the right option, so which is it? (Without editing the config file, or course.) :) Thanks! Hiji

Yeah, I was just puzzled :D No worries. Cheers, Sebastian 2014-12-16 11:09 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: > It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to > Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. > > > > I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what

It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what happened. My mail rules deliver llvmdev messages to a folder named llvmdev unless I'm directly addressed in which case it delivers to my inbox. It looks like you

FYI Both work great on my FC3, wine-20050419, 2.4 GHz box. Key changes to the ./tools/wineinstall $HOME/.wine/config file are as follows: "Managed" = "N" ; a significant change "UseXVidMode" = "N" "UseXRandR" = "N" ; a significant change "DXGrab" = "Y" "Synchronous" =

On Aug 14, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 02:13 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> I’m sorry for the late announcement. >> >> The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please >> pick them up here and test them out! >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5/ > > Can somebody

Quick update before I move on to the final tag. > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken > symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and > looks good so far though Default options were all good. Mips32 was about halfway but was good so far. >

On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 01:31 PM, Ben Pope wrote: > ldd your_built_clang | grep libstdc++ > chrpath -l your_built_clang Hmm, where "your_built_clang" should be the actual failing executable: /home/evansl/dwnlds/llvm/3.5rc1/build/Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-tblgen Ben

Final has been tagged, I think we're about to release it. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has > no recent activity. > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com > > wrote: > >> Quick update

We got everything, haven't we? On 26 February 2015 at 20:44, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote: > Final has been tagged, I think we're about to release it. > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has >> no

Many of them are already live: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#3.5 On 15/01/2015 01:50, Nikola Smiljanic wrote: > In that case are we supposed to build final binaries for 3.5.1? > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com > <mailto:benpope81 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 15, 2015 06:55 AM, Nikola Smiljanic

> On 15.12.2014, at 15:45, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Sebastian Dreßler >> Sent: 15 December 2014 14:08 >> Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase

Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has no recent activity. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Quick update before I move on to the final tag. > > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a > broken >

I've uploaded clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz and clang+llvm-3.5.1-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz. The latter fails prune.m in 'make check-all' as it did last time but this is because the 'touch -a' command isn't actually changing the access timestamp. I've started the test-suite for both of them. ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces

I noticed that R was burning up 100% of a CPU when a call to Sys.sleep() was made. Upon investigation, I discovered that R_checkActivityEx() in src/unix/sys-std.c was putting the entire timeout (in usec) into the struct timeval tv_usec member, leaving tv_sec set to 0. I don't know about other unix variants, but Solaris requires that the timeout value be normalized (i.e. 0 <= tv_usec

On 07/30/2014 10:06 AM, Larry Evans wrote: > On 07/30/2014 12:35 AM, Ben Pope wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 01:31 PM, Ben Pope wrote: >> >>> ldd your_built_clang | grep libstdc++ >>> chrpath -l your_built_clang >> >> Hmm, where "your_built_clang" should be the actual failing executable: >>

Tom (and Andy, Owen, Evan, Nadav), I'd like the following commits placed into the 3.4.1 branch. I've attempted to sort this list by code owner: Andrew Trick: r203719 - PR17473 r203725 - This test need the X86 backend, move it to the X86 sub directory. [adjusts the test location from r203719] r202273 - Fix PR18165: LSR must avoid scaling factors that exceed the limit on truncated use.

Hi, I've taken a look at the binary tarballs for clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-* that have been uploaded and observed the following: * All uploaded tarballs include the generated CMake files apart from ``clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz``. These files (share/llvm/cmake/*.cmake) are missing in this tarball. * Inside the Ubuntu tarball the directory is not consistently named