similar to: CpberPower PR3000LCDRTXL2UN support

On Jan 22, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Phil Stracchino <phils at caerllewys.net> wrote: > Is there any practical benefit to getting the SNMP network card for it > unless I plan to monitor it via SNMP, or can any monitoring and > management I need to do be done perfectly well via serial, as on my APCs? For CyberPower, a SNMP card might be your best bet. I don't have specific experience

On 1/27/19 9:13 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 27, 2019, at 2:36 PM, Phil Stracchino <phils at caerllewys.net > <mailto:phils at caerllewys.net>> wrote: >> The new Cyberpower PR3000 (also 3KVA), wqhich operates at a 90% power >> factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. >> >> I wasn't expecting that much of a reduction. > > So... 50%

I have a CyberPower PR3000LCDRTXL2U with a BP48V75ART2U expansion chassis, which I am monitoring using NUT 2.8.0 (on Gentoo Linux). TThe UPS appears to be telling me that the batteries need replacement due to age. CyberPower support has confirmed that for me and told me how i should be able to mute the alarm from the front panel until I can replace the batteries, but it doesn't appear

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:23?PM Phil Stracchino via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > I have a CyberPower PR3000LCDRTXL2U with a BP48V75ART2U expansion > chassis, which I am monitoring using NUT 2.8.0 (on Gentoo Linux). TThe > UPS appears to be telling me that the batteries need replacement due to > age. CyberPower support has confirmed that for

SO, my full load on my core UPS is two Dell R610s, one Sun X4540, one HP DL360p gen8, two six-core Thuban-II workstations plua their monitors, and the network stack and KVM. The APC SU3000RM (3KVA) that blew up last week considered this to be just short of 60% load. The new Cyberpower PR3000 (also 3KVA), wqhich operates at a 90% power factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. I wasn't

I switched a while back to a Cyberpower PR3000LCDRTXL2U UPS with an external battery chassis. We've lost power twice since I installed it, and both times, the UPS has killed power to everything while still indicating 80% capacity before NUT has even initiated shutdown on anything. Here's what upsc reports on it right now: battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 35

On 2019-12-17 06:18, Roger Price wrote: > > I definitely need to check that the vile daemon is present and running. > > In upsmon.conf there are no NOTIFYFLAG declarations, especially for events > ONBATT and LOWBATT. When ONBATT and LOWBATT occur nothing will happen. There > are no NOTIFYMSG declarations and in particular no messages for the ONBATT and > LOWBATT events.

Well, for a bit of devil's advocate - if the battery swelled, it might hace leaked or fumed, contaminating the device and contacts. The safe approach (for their liability, and for end-users' fire hazard really) is to not claim the device is safe to use anymore. Jim On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 07:11 Ben <bkamen at benjammin.net> wrote: > On 4/1/24 7:37 PM, Phil Stracchino via

On 2019-12-16 05:34, Roger Price wrote: > On Sun, 15 Dec 2019, Phil Stracchino wrote: > >> I switched a while back to a Cyberpower PR3000LCDRTXL2U UPS with an >> external battery chassis. We've lost power twice since I installed it, >> and both times, the UPS has killed power to everything while still >> indicating 80% capacity before NUT has even initiated

So, a while back I got around to ordering replacement batteries for my CyberPower PR3000LCDRTXL2U. When they arrived, I went to swap them in. I was horrified at the flimsiness of CyberPower's battery "trays". I've seen heavier gauge plastic on "blister" packages in the store. I ALSO discovered that the expansion unit had been shipped to me with one of its two

So, I just rebuilt the battery packs in my PR3000LCDRTXL2U and its expansion unit. You don't want to KNOW. If the internal batteries have overheated and bulged, you CANNOT remove the battery pack intact even by partially disassembling the UPS, you have to pry the batteries out via the top of the chassis one by one. It's not pretty. Three and a half hours of work including

Does anyone know whether it is possible to set battery.charge.low lower than 20 on a CyberPower PR3000LCDRTXL2U? 'upsrw -s battery.charge.low 15' returns OK, but does not reduce the setting below 20. Now you may be thinking, "Why would you want to set it lower than 20?" Because with three battery packs, my calculated runtime is about 35 minutes at my full normal operating load,

On 3/21/24 14:00, Greg Oliver via Nut-upsuser wrote: > All I can say is definitely replace the batteries if you are going to > keep using it.? The CyberPower(s) I have had in the past all have the > battery check that cannot be turned off and when the batteries are > actually "dead" the unit will kill the load to everything every time it > runs the check.? Just FYI.

CyberPower Systems PR6000LCDRTXL5U http://www.cyberpowersystems.com/products/ups-systems/smart-app-ups/pp-series/PR6000LCDRTXL5U.html I had to create the following udev rule (on RHEL6): ATTR{idVendor}=="0764", ATTR{idProduct}=="0601", MODE="664", GROUP="dialout" Shutdown testing successful. UPS comes back online after turning off. # upsc battery.charge:

On 1/27/19 9:49 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > You might be lucky with this particular model, but definitely beware of the USB issues I mentioned in another thread: > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22CyberPower+%28CPS%29%22 > > The output of upsc is sorted alphabetically by key, so it isn't immediately obvious which values come

[shutdown sequence] I have tested and verified the shutdown sequence works. [manufacturor] https://www.cyberpowersystems.com/product/ups/ec350g/ mbeisser at nas:~$ upsc ups Init SSL without certificate database battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 10 battery.charge.warning: 20 battery.mfr.date: CPS battery.runtime: 1575 battery.runtime.low: 300 battery.type: PbAcid battery.voltage: 9.3

Build from source, and done . . . wasting your time looking for a less out of date RPM is pointless. . . RPM, .deb, etc are almost always downrev. . . - Tim On June 10, 2017 2:06:42 PM CDT, Ben Kamen <ben at benkamen.net> wrote: >Hey all, > > I recently got an RMCARD205 for my Cyber UPS.... > >if I use no MIBS line in the config file, I get this: > > >> Network

Hey guys, :) recently, I installed Cyberpower PR2200ELCDRT2U, however, I have not managed to get this UPS working with FreeNAS 11, yet. According to compatibility list, PR2200 should work fine, when using powerpanel driver: http://networkupstools.org/ddl/Cyber_Power_Systems/ http://networkupstools.org/ddl/Cyber_Power_Systems/PR2200.html However, when trying to establish a connection between

Helo hostname MUST have resolvable hostname. Crazy or not, but i use this. The _access-allow parts for server you really trust. smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/check_client_access-allow.cidr, reject_unknown_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_invalid_hostname,

On 3/12/21 9:14 PM, Rusty Bower wrote: > Manager/subscriber seems most accurate > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 12, 2021, at 20:13, Douglas Parsons <doug at parsonsemail.com> wrote: >> >> ? >> In place of secondary how about subscriber? It would be accurate to >> the role. I'd been going to suggest controller and ... something.