similar to: HPE Power Protector

I also operate an HP T1500 G3 which it's an Eaton made UPS. Connected on usb i get frequent communication errors and data aquisition stopped. Mine has a serial connection, also. Operating via serial has no trouble. Maybe it's something related to usb setting in bios, i.e. Legacy mode, speed setting, etc. However on serial mode looks like the eaton or hoe power protector software does not

Zitat von nicolae788 <nicolae788 at gmail.com>: > I also operate an HP T1500 G3 which it's an Eaton made UPS. Connected on > usb i get frequent communication errors and data aquisition stopped. Mine > has a serial connection, also. Operating via serial has no trouble. Maybe > it's something related to usb setting in bios, i.e. Legacy mode, speed > setting, etc. >

On February 12, 2019 9:37:17 AM UTC, nicolae788 <nicolae788 at gmail.com> wrote: >I also operate an HP T1500 G3 which it's an Eaton made UPS. Connected >on >usb i get frequent communication errors and data aquisition stopped. >Mine >has a serial connection, also. Operating via serial has no trouble. >Maybe >it's something related to usb setting in bios, i.e.

lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi guys > > does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether > HPE support Linux Vendor > Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' > BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? > > Dunno 'bout "Linux Vendor Firmware Service", but HPE support, ah, yeah... let's not go there. And they *really* want

On 01/07/2019 18:38, mark wrote: > lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >> hi guys >> >> does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether >> HPE support Linux Vendor >> Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' >> BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? >> >> > Dunno 'bout "Linux Vendor Firmware Service",

On 01/07/2019 17:42, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi guys > > does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? > I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor > Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' > BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? > > many thanks, L. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at

Hi, I see some strange and dangerous things happening on a HPE server with HPE Smart Array controller where EL9 ends up with wrong device nodes/symlinks to the attached disks/raid volumes: (I didn't touch anything here but at 08:09 some symlinks were changed) /dev/disk/by-id/: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 1 07:57 scsi-0HP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_00000000 -> ../../sdc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10

hi guys does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? many thanks, L.

On February 9, 2016 9:30 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> > Cc: OpenSSH Devel List <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: Test Failure OpenSSH 7.1 P2 on HPE NSE for integrity > [...] > This one looks odd. The ssh session itself looks OK: it authenticates then > sends a printf shell command (basically, just a way

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3205 Bug ID: 3205 Summary: Support HPE NonStop Server Port Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Build system Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

I have a HP T1500 INTL that isn't picked up under 2.4.3. I added the USB device ID to tripplite-hid.c like: /* HP T1500 INTL */ { USB_DEVICE(HP_VENDORID, 0x1f09), battery_scale_1dot0 }, and it seems to work just fine: # upsc UPS1 at localhost battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 10 battery.charge.warning: 30 battery.temperature: 23.9 battery.type: battery.voltage: 40.9

On February 9, 2016 7:28 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> > Cc: OpenSSH Devel List <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: Test Failure OpenSSH 7.1 P2 on HPE NSE for key-commands > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Randall S. Becker > <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> wrote: > > Thread split from my

On February 8, 2016 3:30 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> > Cc: OpenSSH Devel List <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: [Bug] Regression problem in transfer.sh for OpenSSH 7.1 P2 on > HPE NSE above dd-size 32k > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Randall S. Becker > <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> wrote:

G'Day, I am requesting help in resolving an issue on the HPE NonStop platform in OpenSSH 7.1 P2 in the regression suite for all dd-size above 32k. Previous tests are all passing, but in the for-loop inside regress/transfer.sh, when s is 64k, the command: dd if=$DATA obs=${s} 2> /dev/null | \ ${SSH} -q -$p -F $OBJ/ssh_proxy somehost "cat >

> > > New to xen. > > Does Xen run on the Power PC architecture? Specifically G5.. I see some > > info on the web sites but i haven''t seen anything > > that tells me it''s ready and supported. > > > > If Xen does in fact run on a G5 processor would i be able to install a > > windows O/S as a Domain guest O/S on it? > > Since

New to xen. Does Xen run on the Power PC architecture? Specifically G5.. I see some info on the web sites but i haven''t seen anything that tells me it''s ready and supported. If Xen does in fact run on a G5 processor would i be able to install a windows O/S as a Domain guest O/S on it? Since windows only runs on x86 platforms i wash''t sure if if the Xen virtual

Hello * this morning I tried to upgrade from pxelinux 3.11 to 3.84 and discovered that the localboot stuff does not work on HP DL360 G3 and G5. The latest syslinux Version I found with a working localboot is 3.36. pxelinux.cfg/default: default harddisk prompt 1 label harddisk localboot 0 implicit 0 timeout 250 This so simple, it should just work, shouldn't it? The

Dear R helpers,   Following is a R script I am using to run the Fast Fourier Transform. The csv files has 10 columns with titles m1, m2, m3 .....m10.     When I use the following commands, I am getting the required results. The probelm is if there are 100 columns, it is not wise to define 100 commands as fk <- ONS$mk and so on. Thus, I need some guidance to write the loop for the STEP A and

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> We could just make the testsuite detect that all the targets weren't >> built, and refuse to run the tests... > > No. I don't think thats a good solution. There are many other tests that > should be run. I just need to fix that bug so we only run tests for the > specific target we are on. The issue is that we have

Carlos: Te agradezco mucho tu rápida respuesta y mucho me apena haber planteado tan mal el problema. Porque la matriz en realidad es: g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g1 0 18 13 16 11 12 15 g2 18 0 25 13 22 16 10 g3 13 25 0 28 23 13 25 g4 16 13 28 0 6 7 3 g5 11 22 23 6 0 18 17 g6 12 16 13 7 18 0 8 g7 15 10 25 3 17 8 0 Entonces cada cantidad debe conservar la pertenencia al grupo