similar to: Apple Mac slave

>> I am running NUT on a Synology NAS with attached a USB APC UPS. > > Do you have upsd and upsmon running as daemons on the Synology DSM? > Yes I have them both running on the Synology DSM: root 7236 1 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:16 /usr/sbin/upsd root 7741 1 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/upsmon root 7744 7741 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:12

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Robbie van der Walle wrote: > I am running NUT on a Synology NAS with attached a USB APC UPS. > Do you have upsd and upsmon running as daemons on the Synology DSM? > Yes I have them both running on the Synology DSM:? > root? ? ? 7236 ? ? 1? 0 Jun01 ?? ? ? ? 00:00:16 /usr/sbin/upsd > root? ? ? 7741 ? ? 1? 0 Jun01 ?? ? ? ? 00:00:00

> I see upsd and the first upsmon are running as "root". They are often run as user "nut" or "upsd?. Apparently Synology has implemented it standard like this. Upsmon.conf on the Synology NAS: RUN_AS_USER root I suppose this needs to be changed from a security point of view. > I don't know the Synology NAS, but I guess that unless it is shutdown

On Jun 7, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Roger Price wrote: > > 2. On the NAS, use command > > upsrw -s battery.charge.low=80 -u upsmaster -s sekret UPS Robbie, The "upsrw" command contacts upsd, so it sounds like you should be able to add a user to upsd.users on the NAS, and then run something like this on the Mac: upsrw -s battery.charge.low=80 -u upsmaster -s sekret UPS at

On Jun 9, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Robbie van der Walle <rvanderwalle at gmail.com> wrote: > > What I wonder if the shutdown is done proper. Does the shutdown command use umount to prevent disk corruption? Yes, it prevents filesystem corruption, but I am not sure if it bothers to save the desktop state. You can check the "last" logs to see if it was cleanly shut down: $ last

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Robbie van der Walle wrote: > The "upsrw" command contacts upsd, so it sounds like you should be able to add a user to upsd.users on the NAS, and then run something like > this on the Mac: > > ??upsrw -s battery.charge.low=80 -u upsmaster -s sekret UPS at synology > > Per?http://networkupstools.org/docs/man/upsd.users.html?,

> Yes, See the User Manual http://networkupstools.org/docs/user-manual.pdf chapter 6.3 "Configuring automatic shutdowns for low battery events?. > The NUT documentation is not always clear, and it looks as if the Synology is even less clear. You must distinguish carefully between "system shutdown" and "(delayed) UPS shutdown". The UPS is turned off _after_ the

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Robbie van der Walle wrote: > Out of curiosity, when you shut down the NAS, do you run the > command "upsdrvctl shutdown" ? ?Do you see or hear anything to > suggest that the delayed UPS shutdown has happened? > > I don?t know where to search to answer this. The delayed UPS shutdown > means that Synology NAS will turn off the UPS

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Robbie van der Walle wrote: > I am running NUT on a Synology NAS with attached a USB APC UPS. Do you have upsd and upsmon running as daemons on the Synology DSM? Does the NAS shut down (and restart) correctly when wall power fails? > I am trying to connect and shutdown a Mac OS X system. Is the Mac protected by the same APC UPS as the Synology NAS? > I have

I have the latest version of the Windows port of NUT installed on my Windows?7?machine. The UPS is connected via serial cable to the Windows machine. I also have my Synology NAS (which uses NUT) connected over the local network as a slave to the Windows NUT master. The Synology slave is configured to immediately go into "safe mode" whenever an FSD or OB+LB indication is received from the

Hi everyone, On a server running Debian 9, I have multiple KVM guests automatically started at boot by libvirtd.service and running in the background. When I shutdown this server, libvirtd.service automatically and gracefully shut them all down first. So, every thing is fine so far. Recently, I've added an additional KVM guest and this one does not respond to a shutdown command from virsh

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Alex Chekholko <alex at calicolabs.com> wrote: > In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux > box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. > Not sure if this would be the first attempt. Synology seems to bundle glusterfs in some form [1]. Regards, Vijay [1]

I have had many discussions with Synology about this and other attitudes they have been displaying in the last few years. Also if you log into their NAS, using ssh and take a look at some of the comments that have been added into the "ETC" configs, it makes it very clear. They have also been removing any posts relating to methods or help given in the forums that relate to SAMBA ,

I have a Synology NAS array appliance. It is linux based and uses samba for file sharing. Normally the config is done via a gui interface but you can ssh to the array. The domain controllers are running Samba 3.6.x in classic domain mode. I have member servers running 3.6.x and 4.3.8. no problem. I recently updated the Synology "OS." The current version of samba is

Hi, Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology since that is what they are already using and some of the nice out-of-the-box admin features. From what I can tell Synology runs a custom linux flavor so it should be possible to compile gluster on it. Any first hand experience with it? Thanks, Ben

Hi everyone, My PC don't have an integrated WLAN card, so I bought an USB WIFI device which use the MediaTek MT7601U chip(image 'dongle.jpg'). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ My PC specification- OS = CentOS 7.8.2003. Processor = AMD Ryzen 5 1600. Mother-Board = GA-Gigabyte A320M-S2H

In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Ben Mabey <ben.mabey at recursionpharma.com> wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in > a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology

>> What I wonder if the shutdown is done proper. Does the shutdown command use umount to prevent disk corruption? > > Yes, it prevents filesystem corruption, but I am not sure if it bothers to save the desktop state. > > You can check the "last" logs to see if it was cleanly shut down: > > $ last shutdown reboot > reboot ~ Sun May

upsmon.conf on server:  https://pastebin.com/z4CrUTxb nut.conf on server:  https://pastebin.com/540ShZH7 Permissions for /etc/nut:  https://hastebin.com/qecolodapi.diff On the Synology (I didn’t edit any of these files): ups.conf:  https://hastebin.com/dedereqizi.shell upsd.conf:  https://hastebin.com/pupeseweda.css upsd.users:  https://hastebin.com/ocenamecex.cs I don’t think I am able to run

All, I recently connected my UPS to my NAS. The NAS detected the UPS, and I checked the "Enable network UPS server" option and added relevant IPs to the "Permitted DiskStation devices" option. The NAS is running DSM 5.2-5592 Update 4, with a NUT version of SDS5-2-2015Q1branch-5579-15061. I then attempted to connect my desktop via SNMP. My desktop is running Arch Linux, with a