Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Incorrect battery.runtime.low being reported?"
2015 Oct 12
2
APC Back-UPS ES 650 connected to a Synology DS411slim
All,
I recently connected my UPS to my NAS. The NAS detected the UPS, and I
checked the "Enable network UPS server" option and added relevant IPs to
the "Permitted DiskStation devices" option. The NAS is running DSM 5.2-5592
Update 4, with a NUT version of SDS5-2-2015Q1branch-5579-15061. I then
attempted to connect my desktop via SNMP. My desktop is running Arch Linux,
with a
2015 Oct 14
0
APC Back-UPS ES 650 connected to a Synology DS411slim
[please use reply-all to include the list.]
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Daniel Green <ddgreen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I recently connected my UPS to my NAS. The NAS detected the UPS, and I checked the "Enable network UPS server" option and added relevant IPs to the "Permitted DiskStation devices" option. The NAS is running DSM 5.2-5592 Update 4, with a NUT
2016 Mar 08
2
Incorrect battery.runtime.low being reported?
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you stop and start the driver, it should refresh.
Hi Charles, thanks for the reply! Pardon the dead horse beating, but
I just want to clarify/confirm two things:
1) I did my full power down test (including powering down UPS and NAS,
and restarting them) after the change to 600s on the UPS. Shouldn't
2015 Oct 14
2
APC Back-UPS ES 650 connected to a Synology DS411slim
I found their source code for what appears to be the previous version of
DSM (their OS), the most recent entry in the NUT Changelog is:
2012-05-31 Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at free.fr>
* [r3643] NEWS, UPGRADING, configure.in, docs/website/news.txt:
Final update for 2.6.4 release
Ah ha. Nevermind the above, I tried just running upsmon and that worked
(with settings
2016 Mar 08
0
Incorrect battery.runtime.low being reported?
On Mar 6, 2016, at 1:40 AM, Mike Lee <curby+forums at cur.by> wrote:
>
> As part of the desired second configuration, I reset the UPS to report
> low battery when it had 10 minutes (600s) of estimated battery left.
> However, battery.runtime.low as reported to NUT is still the default
> of 120.
"There are 2 hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming
2016 Mar 09
0
Incorrect battery.runtime.low being reported?
On Mar 8, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Mike Lee <curby+forums at cur.by> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
>> If you stop and start the driver, it should refresh.
>
> Hi Charles, thanks for the reply! Pardon the dead horse beating, but
> I just want to clarify/confirm two things:
>
> 1) I did my full power down
2010 Jul 20
2
APC 5G UPS APC-HID
I've grabbed a snapshot of NUT from just a couple days ago. Glad to see APC's
new 5G UPSes added to the list (though you probably want to add it to the UDEV
52-nut-usbups.rules file as well...).
My issues with new APC Smart-UPS units (SMT1000) :
Powering-down the unit, whether with upsdrvctl or upscmd will not obey the
specified delay in offdelay, or ups.delay.shutdown. Instead, a
2016 Jan 06
0
Cannot remove symlink with missing target
On 06/01/16 17:36, Andreas Maier wrote:
> Hi,
> I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that
> symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the
> client side.
>
> Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory:
>
> 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it:
>
> $ touch a
> $ ln -s a b
> $
2016 Jan 06
4
Cannot remove symlink with missing target
Hi,
I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that
symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the
client side.
Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory:
1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it:
$ touch a
$ ln -s a b
$ ls -l
total 0
-rw-rw-r--. 1 andi andi 0 Jan 6 14:42 a
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 andi andi 1
2005 Jun 07
3
Polycom Phones & shorter than /24 netmasks
Has anybody tried to use a Polycom phone (I have 500s and 600s) with a
netmask shorter than /24? (A network bigger than 255.255.255.0). We've
run out of IPs in our initial /24 network, and I'd like to expand it to
255.255.248.0.
When I set it to 255.255.248.0 I can ping the phone while the bootloader
has control. As soon as the SIP application starts, I stop getting ping
responses. Phone
2015 Sep 15
1
2.2.18 Regression: Incorrect STATUS response for virtual mailboxes
As shown below, adding a message to TRASH doesn't increase
virtual/test's MESSAGES count. However SELECTing virtual/test triggers
the increase; so does running `doveadm mailbox status vsize
virtual/test` in another shell.
$ mkdir -m0700 ~/mail/virtual/test
$ echo -e "TRASH\n\tall" > ~/mail/virtual/test/dovecot-virtual
$ /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
S: * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY
2019 Mar 28
0
configuring Dovecot with wforced and auth_policy_server_url with https results in assertion failed
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 28 March 2019 21:31 Robert Kudyba <rkudyba@fordham.edu> wrote:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
2016 Jul 07
0
[PATCH v2 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port
can be runtime-suspended which disables power resources via ACPI. This
is incompatible with DSM, resulting in a GPU device which is still in D3
and locks up the kernel on resume (on a Clevo P651RA, GTX965M).
Mirror the behavior of Windows 8 and newer[1] (as observed via an AMLi
debugger trace) and stop using the
2006 Mar 16
0
Re: Can dtrace agent of JDK be used in IBM Websphere?
Hi, Yufei:
Thanks for your kind action.
Let me centralize all the harm-hearted guys and involved alias in one email.
Below is the answer of your question (Can you reply with more details on
what failed? Does websphere use an IBM or Sun developed SDK? )
1. Seems IBM bundled JDK can not detect agent options, like below:
If use Sun JDK 1.5, no problem:
/usr/jdk/jdk1.5.0_06/bin/java
2016 May 24
0
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
Since "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports", the parent PCIe port
can be runtime-suspended which disables power resources via ACPI. This
is incompatible with DSM, resulting in a GPU device which is still in D3
and locks up the kernel on resume.
Mirror the behavior of Windows 8 and newer[1] (as observed via an AMLi
debugger trace) and stop using the DSM functions for D3cold when
2010 Oct 19
2
nls & optimize
Hi all,
I'm plotting to get the intersection value of three curves. Defining
the x-axis as dsm, the following code works;
dsm = c(800,600,NA,525,NA,450,400,NA,NA,NA,0)
s3 = seq(0.05,1.05,0.1)
plot(dsm,s3,col="blue",las=1,ylab="fraction",xlab="distance (km)")
fc <- function(x,a,b){a*exp(-b*x)}
fm <- nls(s3~fc(dsm,a,b),start=c(a=1,b=0))
co <- coef(fm)
2016 May 31
0
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:43:56AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 06:13:51PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote:
> > Do you have any suggestions for the case where the pcieport driver
> > refuses to put the bridge in D3 (because the BIOS is too old)? In that
> > case the nouveau driver needs to fallback to the DSM method (but not
> > when runtime PM is
2019 Mar 28
2
configuring Dovecot with wforced and auth_policy_server_url with https results in assertion failed
> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
>> On 28 March 2019 16:08 Robert Kudyba via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> dovecot-2.3.3-1.fc29.x86_64
>>
>> Mar 28 10:04:47 auth: Panic: file http-client-request.c: line 283 (http_client_request_unref): assertion failed:
2008 Jul 17
1
Shutdown by battery.remaining or battery.runtime?
On a test shutdown of an APC Back-UPS RS1500 upsc was run periodically
to follow the UPS discharge, it showed these values:
battery.low 120
battery.charge.low 10
As it turned out, the battery.charge.low was encountered first and the
system shut down there. However, considering the rate at which the
charge was falling at the end I would much rather have had it shutdown
sooner than it did. Is
2013 Jun 07
1
cannot update battery.date value of APC ups battery
Hi,
I'm running this command:
# upsrw -s "battery.date=2013Jun7" -u ups-mon-IT "IT-APC-BOTTOMRIGHT at 127.0.0.1"
Password:
OK
but I'm getting this listing:
# upsc IT-APC-BOTTOMRIGHT at 127.0.0.1
battery.alarm.threshold: 0
battery.charge: 100.0
battery.charge.restart: 15
battery.date: 01/10/06
battery.packs: 000
battery.runtime: 1440
battery.runtime.low: 120