similar to: Configure NUT slaves for D-Link 320 ShareCenter NUT master

Hello, I have a UPS unit attached to the "D-Link 320 ShareCenter", a SOHO 2-bay NAS. I set up the UPS in "Master Mode". Unfortunately it doesn't supply any kind of useful info in the web interface, so I had to connect via ?nc' to port 3493 to get the proper UPS name. I manage to to issue a successful ?upsc? command: root at galois:~# upsc megatec at 192.168.3.6

I was able to root the NAS using this howto[1] - from a rather sketchy blog, full of clickbaits - and found out the default configuration: [root] password = 123 upsmon master [client] password = 123 upsmon slave I bet these are the defaults for every DNS-3xx series out there. I wonder why they did not put the info on the manual. I?m posting this for the ?future generations?.. In case anyone

On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Panagiotis Atmatzidis <atma at convalesco.org> wrote: > > However there is a ?shadow? file which has a ?root? user. The password hash (md5) is not similar to ?admin? password which I use from the web-ui. Definitely something to check, but it would be a coincidence if that worked. NUT's upsd.users is designed to be separate from the system password

Galois, Inc. is pleased to announce the immediate release of the Haskell Lightweight Virtual Machine (or HaLVM), version 1.0. The HaLVM is a port of the GHC runtime system to the Xen hypervisor, allowing programmers to create Haskell programs that run directly on Xen''s "bare metal." Internally, Galois has used this system in several projects with much success, and we hope

Hi, I just stepped on a strange and very annoying bug in rsync-3.1.0 as shipped with SuSE Linux Enterprise 12, but verified the bug also with rsync-HEAD-20170123. I tried to copy some of my movie collection to a usb disk that our TV could read, so it was formatted with vfat. I forgot that vfat can't handle files > 4 GB, and some of the movies were larger. rsync worked for 3 hours copying

Hello, Are there any known efforts to implement RFC 5647 i.e. AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell Transport Layer Protocol for OpenSSH? If not, would OpenSSH project be interested in such feature? Thanks.

Hi Sam, I've not actually gotten to the linking process with my runtime, as I've compiled it with clang -emit-llvm -c, and then archived it with llvm-ar and llvm-ranlib. I'm also not producing a GC plugin, as I'm using the builtin "shadow-stack" strategy. My current build process looks like this: 1. build the compiler 2. build the runtime using clang -emit-llvm -c

Forgot to CC the list. ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: Trevor Elliott <trevor at galois.com> > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 7:33:15 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM GC > > Hi Trevor, > > Are you linking with LibStdC++ or LibC++? That is a requirement for running > code that has been compiled from C++

Hello folks: The introduction: Great product this Samba! The problem: I am trying to migrate an HP LaserJet 4 printer in our office off a VMS system and hang it directly off the back of a UNIX machine. I have created the new entry in the printcap (see below) file on that machine and can print from UNIX - no problem. I created the share in Samba with what I think works pretty well (see below).

Hi, I am sorry for sending this query again here, but maybe I sent it to wrong list yesterday. I am trying to compile LonestarGPU-rev2.0 <http://iss.ices.utexas.edu/?p=projects/galois/lonestargpu/download> benchmark suite with LLVM/CLANG. This suite has a following piece of code (more info here

Hi, I've been using Tinc for a couple years to encrypt some Samba shares on my home LAN. Today, I've been thinking about using Tinc to set up a VPN for VOIP/SIP traffic. I have reviewed the following pages of the Tinc documentation. Link 1 - http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation/Encryption-of-network-packets.html Link 2 - http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation/The-UDP-tunnel.html Link 3 -

(As per IRC discussion) I understand that the carry-less multiplication algorithm has it's uses since/and it is implemented as an instruction in many architectures and that adding it as a general-purpose intrinsic will allow us to drop target-specific intrinsics as by-product. What i do *NOT* understand is: what is the actual/main goal/driving factor of adding an LLVM intrinsic for it? The

05.07.2020, 05:22, "Roman Lebedev" <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Shawn Landden via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>  Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more. >> >>  This proposal is to add a

Can someone help me what went wrong with this call? This call was initiated from dev/ttyI0 device on my asterisk server to mediatrix unit. Mediatrix unit user received the call and call started. I can hear them OK but they can not hear me correctly (cut-off sound, noise). Call was finally hunged up. Can anyone point out if there was something wrong? -*CLI> sip debug SIP Debugging Enabled

I have asterisk with following users; a) zaphfc ISDN card with two channels b) two mediatrix FXS gateways with four channels each c) 1x CISCO 7905G d) two notebooks with MS Messenger 4.7 Now, it seems that any combination works correctly in all combinations except when I call from MS messenger and then call is dropped always in 25th second of the call. Any ideas what I did wrong? here is my

Hi All, Just added a Siemens DECT SIP/PSTN S450 phone to login to my A*k server, and I see "Got SIP response 405 "Method Not Allowed" back from 192.168.3.64" but the phone seems to work ok. Any ideas where it falls over in the SIP protocol? I've included this in the debug below. ubiphone*CLI> <-- SIP read from 192.168.3.64:5060: --- (0 headers 0 lines) Nat

<div> </div><div><div><p>Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more.</p><p>This proposal is to add a <code>llvm.clmul</code> instruction. Or if that is contentious, <code>llvm.experimental.bitmanip.clmul</code> instruction.

Hello Arno, Can apply the patch directly or should I recompile nut? Best regards, Panagiotis On 3/4/2015 5:06 ??, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Hello Panagiotis > > 2015-04-03 14:28 GMT+02:00 Panagiotis Kritikakos > <panagiotis.kritikakos at nikitec.gr > <mailto:panagiotis.kritikakos at nikitec.gr>>: > > Hello Arno, > > Question: have you also

Hello Arno, FreeNAS doesn't come with a compiler and I had to compile with the patch on FreebBSD-9.3 and then copy the produced mge-shut. Unfortunately it didn't work out. For every try I was getting "Connection Refused" and when I tried /usr/local/libexec/nut/mge-shut -D -a <ups_name> I was always getting 'No matching HID UPS found'. I returned back to the

Hello, I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server. Installation went smoothly, RAID controller and network cards were successfully recognised. But, after the installation, the server fails to boot from disk. There were some posts, about two years ago, in this list implying that the problem lies in UEFI but I couldn't find any clear solution. Any suggestions would