Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[meta] Yahoo, Gmail and DMARC"
2017 Aug 24
0
dmarc report faild ?
Maurizio Caloro:
> Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain
> on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems.
>
> Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue?
I guess, the reports are about messages you sent to the list:
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-August/109097.html
are you *really* sure you signed the
2019 Sep 17
0
OT: DMARC / DKIM Failure Reports
On 2019-09-17 09:06, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I
> received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this
> problem and if so how?
>
That is why DMARC took 10 years of heated discussions, before it was
actually implemented - in first place by big boys who will never
2019 Feb 09
2
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks [was: Re: Bounces?]
Am 09.02.19 um 19:56 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
> I'll review the settings when we manage to upgrade to mailman3
Hello Aki,
before updating to mailman3 consider an simpler update to latest mailman2.
you're using 2.1.15, current mailman2 is 2.1.29
Your missing an /significant amount/ of DMARC fixes!
and: more off-topic:
while my messages *to* the dovecot list are sent using
2019 Sep 17
2
OT: DMARC / DKIM Failure Reports
Hi guys,
when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this problem and if so how?
This is the first report:
This is an email abuse report for an email message received from IP 208.100.23.70 on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:56:25 +0200.
The message below did not meet the sending domain's DMARC policy.
For
2015 Jan 04
0
DMARC test
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Test from Yahoo via Android
>
> --Gene
> _______________________________________________
> Syslinux mailing list
> Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com
> Unsubscribe or set options at:
> http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux
As some users may already be aware, my test
2015 Jan 04
4
DMARC test
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Test from Yahoo via Android
> >
> > --Gene
> > _______________________________________________
> > Syslinux mailing list
> > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com
> > Unsubscribe or set options at:
2019 Feb 09
0
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks [was: Re: Bounces?]
On 2/9/19 10:48 AM, Juri Haberland via dovecot wrote:
> On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>> For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;(
>>
>> It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again.
>
> I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC
> checking without
2019 Feb 09
0
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks [was: Re: Bounces?]
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 09 February 2019 at 20:48 Juri Haberland via dovecot <
<a href="mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org">dovecot@dovecot.org</a>> wrote:
</div>
2019 Feb 09
8
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks [was: Re: Bounces?]
On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;(
>
> It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again.
I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC
checking without using exceptions for the lists they are on. It's a known
fact that DMARC does not
2018 Nov 21
0
analysing of dmarc report
I have a problem with understanding dmarc reports and some features.
I attach two reports. First one come from google.com, second one from
tumieszkamy.pl. On my server is dns zone of domain kamir-transport.pl but
whole mail service is deployed on Google - in dns zone MX points to Google
and there are all mailboxes, aliases etc. Last time I have configured dkim
and dmarc policies and I got two
2019 Feb 09
0
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks
* Juri Haberland via dovecot:
> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences
> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving
> participants.
Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also,
the issue was not on the receiving end, but the reject policy for the
originating domain.
Personally, I choose to treat
2017 Aug 24
3
dmarc report faild ?
In the same vein,
I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org.
Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a
DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report.
It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the
the of a DMARC report) pass...
Here is what I am getting :
This is an authentication failure report for an email
2019 Feb 10
2
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks
On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote:
> * Juri Haberland via dovecot:
>
>> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences
>> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving
>> participants.
>
> Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also,
> the issue was not on the
2016 Nov 04
0
mailing list mail from @yahoo addresses
On 04/11/16 17:18, Richard wrote:
> [extracted from "Re: [CentOS] dnf and failing epel" message chain.]
>
>
>> From: lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk
>> Date: Fri Nov 4 13:39:40 UTC 2016
>>> Date: Friday, November 04, 2016 08:51:07 -0400
>>> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at
2013 Sep 05
2
Vacation message and DMARC validation
Greetings,
I have found an issue in the interaction between sieve vacation messages
and the SPF, DKIM and DMARC email validation systems.
For example, let's say we have a message coming from a at a.com to b at b.com
at a server imap.mydomain.com. The account b at b.com has a vacation rule
in sieve, and that generates an autoresponse to a at a.com. Our problem
begins with the definition
2015 Jan 17
0
DMARC test (request)
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
<snip/>
> > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties
> > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure.
>
> The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject
>
> We shall see how
2016 Nov 04
2
mailing list mail from @yahoo addresses
[extracted from "Re: [CentOS] dnf and failing epel" message chain.]
> From: lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk
> Date: Fri Nov 4 13:39:40 UTC 2016
>> Date: Friday, November 04, 2016 08:51:07 -0400
>> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:30:02PM +0000, lejeczek wrote:
>>>
>>> ps. I
2015 Apr 05
0
Some subscribers posts to the list ending up in Gmail spam
On 04/04/2015 09:59 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Did we work out the technical reason why some users that post to the list
> are getting dumped into gmail spam?
>
> Ta,
>
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It is most probably due to the various issues
2015 Jan 22
0
DMARC test (request)
> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:34 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
> > <snip/>
2018 Nov 30
0
DMARC policies
On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers temporarily
> disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now taken actions
> to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled members have
> been restored.
>
> Aki
>
>
I've seen that happen on several lists.
I disabled DMARC