similar to: dnsmasq centos 7

Hi Niki, Thanks good article... I was close in what I did - but still not working. I made this config file in /etc/dnsmasq.d more lsi.conf domain-needed bogus-priv interface = eth0 expand-hosts local = / LayeredSolutionsInc.com / domain = LayeredSolutionsInc.com # The address 192.168.1.14 is the static IP of this server # You can find this ip by running ifconfig and look for the # IP of the

Le 24/11/2016 ? 10:22, Yamaban a ?crit : > Hmmm, looks like the "lookup question" from amandine(server) is not > resolved in the same way it is resoved from bernadette or raymonde > (clients). After some more fiddling, I guess I found a solution to my problem. If we formulate the problem differently, we can say that the clients use the information provided by Dnsmasq, but the

Hi, I just setup CentOS 7 on three boxes to fiddle with it. 1. amandine.sandbox.lan is a headless LAN server 2. bernadette.sandbox.lan is a client desktop 3. raymonde.sandbox.lan is another client desktop I've setup Dnsmasq on amandine.sandbox.lan. Here's the very basic configuration: # /etc/dnsmasq.conf domain-needed bogus-priv interface=enp3s1

Hi, My local server is running CentOS 7. The machine has two NICs and is acting as a gateway. For DHCP and DNS, I'm using Dnsmasq. I have a strange little problem with local hostname resolution. Before going into more details, here's my configuration. [root at nestor:~] # ifconfig enp2s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.2 netmask

So I have two CentOS 7 machines running. if I am on my server and I do "curl http://192.168.1.8" I get data. If I do "host devgeis.LayeredSolutionsInc.com" I get the correct address 192.168.1.8 if I goto another machine with CentOS 7. I do "curl http://192.168.1.8" I get data. I do "host devgeis.LayeredSolutionsInc.com" I get the correct address

Are you sure you have opened 53/udp ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov ? ??????, 31 ???????? 2020 ?., 16:15:10 ???????+2, Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> ??????: Hi Niki, Thanks good article... I was close in what? I did - but still not working. I made this config file in /etc/dnsmasq.d more lsi.conf domain-needed bogus-priv interface = eth0 expand-hosts local = /

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on all my servers, in three different contexts : 1. simple local server 2. public facing server 3. router/gateway/firewall I'm currently in the process of moving my KISS-style network-scripts-style configurations to something more orthodox based on NetworkManager. Scenarios (1) and (2) caused no problems, but (3) is giving me some headache. Let me

Did you notice the address ? It is not the same IP. Patrick Le 02/11/2020 ? 17:48, Jerry Geis a ?crit?: > So I have two CentOS 7 machines running. > > if I am on my server and I do "curl http://192.168.1.8" I get data. > If I do "host devgeis.LayeredSolutionsInc.com" I get the correct address > 192.168.1.8 > > if I goto another machine with CentOS 7.

Le 18/02/2020 ? 12:28, Anand Buddhdev a ?crit?: > Neither. The DNS configuration should not normally be bound to a > specific interface, so don't configure it with any interface. If you do, > and that interface goes down, your DNS config also disappears. I would like to do that very much, only NetworkManager makes you jump through burning loops to do so. With network-scripts, it

I am trying to boot a grub entry for CentOS 8 menuentry "Server Install CentOS 8" { linux /boot/vmlinuz noverifyssl ks= https://devgeis.LayeredSolutionsInc.com:443/kickstart/ks_update_to_server8.cfg biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0 ksdevice=eth0 ip=192.168.1.13 gateway=192.168.1.1 netmask=255.255.255. 0 nameserver=192.168.1.1 inst.sshd sshd=1 initrd /boot/initrd.img

Hi, In our local school we have two servers and roughly 80 clients. The network is 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0, and DHCP+DNS is managed by Dnsmasq. School PCs (teachers and management) are registered via MAC address and get an IP address in a specific range: 192.168.10.2 - 192.168.10.50 - management + teachers 192.168.10.201 - 192.168.10.220 - computer room 192.168.10.246 - 192.168.10.247 -

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: wishlist Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile? This is the standard dnsmasq output. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

Hi, I just installed CentOS 7 on a public server. I'd like to setup BIND as a primary DNS server for a few domains. Until now, all my public machines were running Slackware Linux, and setting up BIND on a Slackware machine is relatively easy. In its out of the box configuration, it has a bone-headed caching nameserver role, which is quite easy to expand to a primary nameserver. Here's my

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, maybe this is an old fart, but I cant get it to work. I am running libvirt on a laptop, where a dnsmasq is already running to delegate dns info for my local (not-public) network. My resolv.conf (on the host) lists the system-dnsmasq as first server. I had to set the listen-adress for the system-dnsmasq to 127.0.0.1 and set

Le 17/11/2019 ? 18:56, Jonathan Billings a ?crit?: > You should never be using ntpdate anymore (which is why the ntp project is deprecating it, http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/DeprecatingNtpdate <http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/DeprecatingNtpdate> ). I really only ever suggest ntpd unless you?re running an NTP server that provides NTP service to your network, and needs to

Hi, In the past I've setup simple centralized authentication with NIS and NFS, without bothering about possible security implications. Over the next month I have to setup a new network in a local school, and I wonder if I should use NIS/NFS. I still have my own documentation, it's simple and somewhat bone-headed to setup, and it just works. RHEL/CentOS 7 still provide NIS, and I vaguely

Hello everyone ! Well, I'm setting up a 'new' box with samba 4.9.3 on Ubuntu 18.04 Idea is to use Host OS for Domain Controler (dc1.smb.domain.tld) and a LXC container (ubuntu 18.04 too) as Domain Member with File Server (fs.smb.domain.tld). Administration through Windows OS will be done with a Qemu KVM. Bad thing is that I get : > Failed to bind to 0.0.0.0:53 TCP -

> > Of course, to be fair, there may have been a *reason* for not doing it > that way before.... > Between the early 1990's and early 2000's the price of a GB of memory went from ~$100,000 to ~$1000*. I guess a lot of the design decisions made for things like init were focussed on this. In 1995 is was common for server platforms to have 32Mb ram whereas the kernel alone in my

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal Tags: patch The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM. -- System Information: Debian Release:

Hello there, I wanted to share a problem I'm having with libvirt, for the case someone here could know how to solve it. I'm using an Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, I have libvirtd already installed and I think I got all the dependencies installed. So, I'm using virsh net-create to create this network: <network> <name>pepito</name> <forward mode='nat'/>