similar to: guidance on enabling 2FA at Linux GUI level

Sure did! I am even playing with different options (including NONE) and it seems to ignore the contents of ssl.conf I have tried Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:+TLS1.2:!TLS1.1:!TLS1.0:!ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA: Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:+TLS1.2:!TLS1.1:!TLS1.0:!ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=PFS

Thanks, Randal for the response. But it did not work. Here the results: #yum info cockpit Name : cockpit Arch : x86_64 Version : 195.1 Release : 1.el7.centos.0.1 Size : 51 k Repo : installed >From repo : extras Summary : Web Console for Linux servers URL : https://cockpit-project.org/ License : LGPLv2+ [root at cockpit ~]# cat

sorry corrections: For this test I created a 40GB lvm volume group with /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc then a 40GB LV then a 60GB VDO vol (for testing purposes) vdostats --verbose /dev/mapper/vdoas | grep -B6 'saving percent' output from just created vdoas [root at localhost ~]# vdostats --verbose /dev/mapper/vdoas | grep -B6 'saving percent' physical blocks : 10483712

Hi Erick, what was the value of 'si' in top ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov ?? 3 ??? 2020 ?. 18:48:30 GMT+03:00, Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises <eperez at quadrianweb.com> ??????: >It was found that the software NIC team created in Centos was having >issues due to a failing network cable. The team was going berserk with >up/down changes. > > >On Fri, Jul 3,

It was found that the software NIC team created in Centos was having issues due to a failing network cable. The team was going berserk with up/down changes. On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 10:12 AM Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises < eperez at quadrianweb.com> wrote: > Hey! > I have a strange condition in one of the servers that I don't where to > start looking. > I login to the

On May 3, 2020 8:33:33 AM GMT+03:00, Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises <eperez at quadrianweb.com> wrote: >sorry corrections: >For this test I created a 40GB lvm volume group with /dev/sdb and >/dev/sdc >then a 40GB LV >then a 60GB VDO vol (for testing purposes) > >vdostats --verbose /dev/mapper/vdoas | grep -B6 'saving percent' >output from just created

Benson, no SELINUX was not enabled. The instance was selected without it just to make things easier. I do not have a pull request for the installation manual yet. On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:21 AM Benson Muite <benson_muite at emailplus.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 4, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises wrote: > > Hi Centos friends. > > I had some time to

Hi Centos friends. I had some time to write a spartan tutorial on running the latest stable Jitsi Video Bridge and Jitsi Meet and Centos 7.7. I wrote it while testing it so this WORKS and I am currently using it for fun with the kids. I do have the server currently running but blocked by my firewall. I am willing to allow a few of the people such a Kovacs and others to connect to my Jitsi server

Also, if you want to use deduplication (via VDO) then you must remember to "dedupe then encrypt" Storage > LUKS > VDO > LVM old but good reference to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/2106521 On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:00 PM Jason Edgecombe <jwedgeco at uncc.edu> wrote: > > I recommend having LUKS be "under" LVM. the layers would be: > /dev/sda ->

I usually use the command "dd if=iso of=usbdevice status=progress && sync" On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, 18:36 Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises, < eperez at quadrianweb.com> wrote: > That happened to me several times > My USB was "burned" and never displayed new data copied to it. > By "burned" I mean the flash drive was faulty up to a point where

Hey! I have a strange condition in one of the servers that I don't where to start looking. I login to the server via SSH (cant doit any other way) and anything that I type is slow HTTP sessions timeout waiting for screen redraw. So, the server is acting "slow". server is bare metal. no virtual services. no alarms in the disk raid note: server was restarted because of power failure.

In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have a disk that is flagging errors, attempting to rescue the data. > > > > I tried dd first - if gets about 117G of 320G disk

what if you just dd the first 1GB of the disk and the last GB of the disk (the last because of RAID signatures of some controllers that write to the end of the disk) Look at this article and modify accordingly https://zedt.eu/tech/linux/using-dd-to-repeatedly-erase-a-specific-range-of-sectors-on-the-hard-disk/ Also, use wipefs -a (Gordon Messmer answered faster than me) On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at

@tonymountifield Does this still hold true? https://superuser.com/a/1075837 On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis

On Dec 27, 2019, at 16:28, Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises <eperez at quadrianweb.com> wrote: > > [root at cockpit ~]# cat /etc/systemd/system/cockpit.service.d/ssl.conf > Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:-VERS-SSL3.0:-VERS-TLS1.0:-VERS-TLS1.1 > > [root at cockpit ~]# > [root at cockpit ~]# systemctl start cockpit > [root at cockpit ~]# systemctl status

Good morning, in order to post proper documentation, what logs (or log level) do I need to troubleshoot a Centos 7.6.1810 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64 tha tis running a NFS server on top LVM on top of XFS on top of VDO on top of MDAM on a 6 SSD disk RAID6 ? This physical NFS server is servign 2 NFS v4.2 shares to 2 physical KVM virtualization hosts. When remote NFS clients start doing intensive

What's your dd command? Are you sure you are writing to the raw disk and not inside a partition? On 29/01/2020 16:30, Jerry Geis wrote: > Well after a closer look - Seems like the OLD 8.0 iso image is still on the > USB. Not the new 8.1 > > I have tried to redo the dd command to copy the 8.1 iso - I get no errors - > but it still comes up with the 8.0 > I then tried to

I'm trying to figure out a puzzling thing that we are seeing with some recently joined or re-joined samba servers. Our linux servers are in a different DNS domain than our AD machines (nwra.com or cora.nwra.com vs ad.nwra.com for the AD machines). Generally when we've joined a machine to AD the DNS name recorded in AD is their regular linux FQDN. But a couple machines have ended up with

I block all my email ports except 25 from countries where I am not going to be sending or receiving email. I also block many datacenters, but blocking Digital Ocean, Vultur and AWS will get you 90%of the way there. You will need to use 587, that is no auth on 25. Again no blocking on 25, just block the other email ports. I get maybe one attempt to log into my email account a week. Yeah not as

Hi, I'm using cockpit in standard port 9090 in a Centos 7 system. Due to a suggestion from management, they want TLS 1.1 disabled system-wide in all Linux boxes and TLS 1.2 enabled. I have not found proper documentation on how to disable it for cockpit (version 195.1 ships with Centos 7) So far I have tried (https://cockpit-project.org/guide/149/https.html):