similar to: Creating unique code

Hello I have a question. I made an r-script and did a few commands needed to make some new variables. They all work out well, and when I run the commands, the new variables appear in the dataset. I can also work with these new variables to make other new variables from them. Also, when I use summary(dataset), those new variables appear in the summary of the dataset. But, when I do summary(new

Hi Hannah, Yes, that does give me more insight. The polygyny only doesn't matter, for even if there was polyandry it could be coded in the same way. If I understand this correctly you have one variable (SPRULE) that must contain information about the household of the individual and the identities of his (or her) relationship partner(s). The household number can accommodate up to three

Hi Hannah, Using the same code I sent before, you can append the partner codes to the household code. I apologize, but I don't know how to use the dplyr/tidyr/... stuff so this is written in straight R code using logic statements. ipumsi_00008_dta<- read.table( text="country year sample serial hhwt pernum perwt resident sploc sprule 204 2013 204201301 4000 10 1 10 1 5 2 204 2013

Hi, I have a question today regarding how the various form elements in _form.rhtml are named. I understand that for a database table "persons" with a column headed by "name", then in _form.rhtml it will probably be like: <p><label for="person_name">Name><br/> <%= text_field ''person'', ''name''

This post is simply documenting a spouse-friendly way of using the spa-3000 as both a fxs and fxo port for basic soho environments in the US, allowing asterisk to participate as needed/wanted. All home phones are connected _only_ to the spa-3000 fxs port. The incoming home pstn line is connected _only_ to the spa-3000 fxo port. Defined Line 1 (fxs) to register with asterisk via sip (extn

I have a people table with four types of people: clients, spouses, children, and others all setup using single-table inheritance with a foreign key back to a household record. A Household has_one client and spouse, and has_many children and others. I want to use a single "Household.find(@session [:household_id], :include => [:client, :spouse, :children, :others])"

I tried implementing my * and it didn't pass the spouse factor at this time. I wanted to hook it up for outbound only at this point to get a better handle on the dial plans and the echo problem. I thought this might have been done before as a natural part of testing - but maybe not. In wcfxo.c I found this: if (!wc->offhook && !wc->ringdebounce) { if

I received a private request for my complete dataset from my previous questions. In gratitude to the developers of R, and especially to the helpful members of r-help, I'm happy to attach it. Anyone is free to use this dataset in any manner they wish, including published books. Attribution is not required, or even desired. Explanatory notes on dataset: This data is collected from monthly

Well, I understand what they do and how, I just don''t get why! It seems to me that any time you would have this relationship between two tables...they should be one table! Agile Rails book gives what seems to me to be a lame example for this. They use the example of an "invoice" and an "order". An invoice belongs to an order and an order has one invoice. Seems

Hello everyone, I need some help with lists inside lists (a good way to emulate a struct)\ Assume that there is a small list called fred: fred <- list(happy = 1:10, name = "squash") and a big list called bigfred that includes fred list 5 times bigfred <- rep(fred,5) Is it possible somehow to index all these sublists(fred) inside bigfred with a more direct way like this:

Hey, The recent discussion on NAS/SAN and the Thecus N8800 got me to thinking. Bit of background. I have an old Dual Athlon MP2800+ that I'm using for a home web/file server. It runs fine but between the noise of the various fans and it's location in the living room, I've been asked by my spouse to find a replacement for it that's smaller & quieter. Looking at the Thecus, and

I am setting up an after-hours on-call system. Someone calls in and requests service, and while they listen to music on hold, we dial out to several people's cell phones and home phones. We don't know if they will be answered by the employee, or by voicemail or a spouse/relative/child/pet. So we play a message that says "press 1 to accept the call" and ask employees to train

Hi All, I'm not well versed in the samba code base so I'm asking here.. :) I only wanted to run a small AD/DC for my SOHO (1 spouse, 3 kids, 1 dog & 1 cat). I've managed to build 4.10.2 on rhel7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 and python-2.7. (this required an updated cmocka, which in turn required an updated cmake) but... building without testsuite and without clustering (ctdb) allows

Hi all, I have a dataset of individuals where the variable ID corresponds to the identification of the household where the individual lives. rel.head stands for the relationship with the household head. so rel.head=1 is the household head, rel.head=2 is the spouse, rel.head=3 is the children. Here is an example to see how it looks like: df<-data.frame(ID=c("17100",

Finally moved my home desktop from Fedora to CentOS. My spouse was unhappy with me upgrading from F9-->F10-->f11 etc and wanted something more stable. I built a second machine which is now running in parallel to the old F11 desktop. I moved my data (mail and files) from the F11 box to the CentOS 5.4 box. I used tar to move everything. Mail and files transferred A-OK...but the Evolution

I'm looking to give the SPA-3000 a whirl as I'm having too much difficulty with the irq sharing thing inside the box. I'm reading the book but without having one in-hand to play with it appears a little obtuse at this time. Before I drop down my money can someone with some hands-on with one of these confirm if the SPA-3000 can: a) detect inbound distinctive ring (this looks to me like

I am simulating sickness among a group of families. Part of the task is to randomly draw who in the family will be sick, randomly drawing from family ID's where Dad =1, Mom = 2, Kid1 = 3, Kid2 = 4., etc. My census of Dads is of the form shown below. Dad_ID Spouse (Y=1;N=0) #Kids #People_Becoming_Sick 1 1 0 1 2

I am confused by the logic of renaming: # Rename individual list items? Empl<-list(employee="Anna",spouse="Fred") names(Empl)<-c("empl","spo") names(Empl) #[1] "empl" "spo" # worked like a charm... but names(Empl[1])<-"newempl" # no error message, yet .... names(Empl) #[1] "empl" "spo" #

Hi all, I need to export the document as csv file, i have exported successfully, but the problem is not displayed as per my format, in csv file the format is suffuled, i want the orderwise as how i have mentioned in my query, please help me to come out in the order wise. My coding is: @report_data=EdiaUserContact.find_by_sql( "SELECT '''' as ''Title'',

X server, that is (as opposed to my ex-spouse...) Anyway, I was loving life with my rebuilt 2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0custom041130a kernel, and then ran "yum update", which gave me a grub line for 2.4.21-20.0.1EL, but the 21-20 not only won't work with the old X settings, I can't get it to set up X at all. I tried running "yum update" from a console on this kernel, but yum