similar to: Asterisk and SIP Proxy on same host = media problem

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Administrator <admin at tootai.net> wrote: > Hello, > > We have a provider which is using Kamailio as front end. Our asterisk > 13/chan_sip server has no problem to register and pass/receive calls > form this provider. > > Now we want to move to asterisk 16/pjsip and face problem. Registration > is OK but when we pass a call our INVITE

Hello, We have a provider which is using Kamailio as front end. Our asterisk 13/chan_sip server has no problem to register and pass/receive calls form this provider. Now we want to move to asterisk 16/pjsip and face problem. Registration is OK but when we pass a call our INVITE never receive answer from the provider. We opened a ticket to their support but in the mean time we want to know

Hi, We have some Asterisk servers that we are moving behind a NAT to preserve public addresses and make room for growth. This is Asterisk 1.4 NAT works very good with the externip/localnet-setting when we are connected directly to our teleco. But when I try to use NAT and put them behind our Kamailio something interesting happens: The media-address in the SDP is the internal ip and not the

I've raised a bug report about this here: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19268 I'm just wondering who else has been investigating RFC 5922 style certificate practices? Which CAs have been able to provide appropriate certificates? What kind of interoperability testing has been done between the major products (e.g. Asterisk, Kamailio, OpenSIPS, reSIProcate/repro)?

Hi, I want to have Kamailio in front of one or more Asterisk boxes. I don't think it is necessary for Kamailio and Asterisk to register with one another. I'd like for PJSIP to recognise Kamailio by its IP address. I have two boxes, both have public IP addresses, they also have private IP addresses and can communicate with each other. I have a Snom phone accessing Kamailio via its

I am experiencing a "606 not Acceptable" error trying to set up an Asterisk server as an ekiga.net client. My server is behind a firewall with NAT routing. I have googled this problem and read about Asterisk feeding its local ip address to ekiga.net. That seems to be my problem. I tried putting stunaddr=stun.ekiga.net into the sip.conf file under [ekiga]. I also tried

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Kirill Marchuk <62mkv at mail.ru> wrote: > Hi all > > Have recently watched Matt Jordan's session on Kamailio World 2014 > > On slides 26-29 of his presentation > (http://www.kamailio.org/events/2014-KamailioWorld/day1/09-Matt.Jordan-Asterisk12-And-PJSIP.pdf) > he speaks about a (completely new, for me at least) approach to build

Hi, I tried to turn on Video and get the following cli-WARNING output -- Executing [8600 at outgoing-kamailio:1] Answer("PJSIP/7000-00000000", "") in new stack > 0x7f46f41ff2e0 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 192.168.8.203:17200 -- Executing [8600 at outgoing-kamailio:2] ConfBridge("PJSIP/7000-00000000", "8600") in new stack --

OK, it stopped working. It turns out the transport and endpoints in PJSIP are ok. I can send an invite from my unregistered snom phone and I can see some activity in the CLI. However, when I dial from my snom to Kamailio and have it pass the message to asterisk, PJSIP seems to ignore the sip messages even though they are there. Is there something wrong in the invite that I'm missing? U

Hi Jeff Are you aware of any challenges of hosting it on AWS? It will help me to work out alternate plan. Is there any recommendation? Should I split it to multiple instances and balance traffic across multiple small server instances? I can use Kamailio to balance traffic. I see many posts referring to AWS deployment. Please help me to choose AWS server instance. *Thanks & Regards,*

Hi all, I saw Matt Jordan's recent Kamailio world talk and was interested in the idea he proposed of stripping out authentication and registration from asterisk and letting Kamailio handle it. All of the tutorials I've seen (e.g. on asipto) show Kamailio forwarding registrations to asterisk. In order to do what Matt suggested would I be correct in assuming I would have to use the

Amazon instances are shared resources. I wouldn't want to count on timing or disk throughput, and you can't just ask them to do "ssd" - its a virtual machine! 500 simultaneous recordings is a hefty load, and I would want to know that the underlying hardware is dedicated to the task. Sure you see lots of posts about hosting asterisk and/or freeswitch on EC2. I have done it

We are using using what Cisco's Port Address Translation, so that all SIP traffic is done through %EXTERNIP%. ?To any outside box, it should look like the asterisk server is actually on %EXTERNIP%. My SIP packet gets sent to the ITSP with a Call-ID: 2fd557964ca936b66661d72f1328c918@%EXTERNIP% , but the SIP 200 OK reply from ITSP has Call-ID: 2fd557964ca936b66661d72f1328c918@%INTERNIP%. ?I can

On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:14 PM Administrator <admin at tootai.net> wrote: > > Le 17/01/2020 à 11:54, Administrator a écrit : > > > > Le 15/01/2020 à 19:24, Administrator a écrit : > >> Hi all, > >> > >> we face a strange behavior while connecting an Asterisk16 instance > >> with PJSIP to 2 providers: we receive error 401 Unauthorized,

We are using using what Cisco's Port Address Translation, so that all SIP traffic is done through %EXTERNIP%. ?To any outside box, it should look like the asterisk server is actually on %EXTERNIP%. My SIP packet gets sent to the ITSP with a Call-ID: 2fd557964ca936b66661d72f1328c918@%EXTERNIP% , but the SIP 200 OK reply from ITSP has Call-ID: 2fd557964ca936b66661d72f1328c918@%INTERNIP%. I can

Still a shared resource. I don't see the benefit. Even beyond the shared resource bit, with the kind of IO you are likely to be pushing, you will want a decent NAS with lots of spindles and fibre channel to your hosts. j On 03/08/2015 10:51 AM, Jai Rangi wrote: > Digital ocean offers ssd on all the virtual machines. Uptime is good. > > Jai Rangi > Www.didforsale.com

From: Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> > > > >> If the INVITE request is not shown in the CLI with 'pjsip set logger > >> on', then Asterisk is not actually receiving the request. > >> > >> Does a pcap show the message being sent to the correct IP/port? If you > >> change the transports to bind to port 5060, does that change

Hi! my asterisk-12.2.0 with pjsip-2.2.0 does not translate codecs any more. I tried every combination. silent on both sides. I compiled pjsip with no resample in pjsip. ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --disable-sound*--disable-resample* --disable-video --disable-opencore-amr is there a way to force asterisk back to do the codec translation? Attachment: sip show channel of the

Le 17/01/2020 à 11:54, Administrator a écrit : > > Le 15/01/2020 à 19:24, Administrator a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> we face a strange behavior while connecting an Asterisk16 instance >> with PJSIP to 2 providers: we receive error 401 Unauthorized, both of >> them having Kamailio as front-end. With other providers -we don't >> know if they run

Hi all Have recently watched Matt Jordan's session on Kamailio World 2014 On slides 26-29 of his presentation (http://www.kamailio.org/events/2014-KamailioWorld/day1/09-Matt.Jordan-Asterisk12-And-PJSIP.pdf) he speaks about a (completely new, for me at least) approach to build scalable telephony systems, using N instances of Kamailio and N instances of Asterisk Are there any