similar to: New RTP engine

Hello, I'm trying to get calls working between websocket clients and sip clients. For clients I have sip.js based clients on chrome, Zoipers and a Grandstream phone. Challenge here is I'd like to have Kamailio and rtpengine to handle the bridging between different rtp profiles but Asterisk changes them in the sdp bodies along the way. I'm using Asterisk 11.11.0. Is there a way to

For those that were interested I have attached the kamailio.cfg which we have working with Kamailio 4.2.1 and Asterisk 1.8.23/32. Specifically, the following yum packages: kamailio.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms kamailio-auth-ephemeral.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms kamailio-bdb.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms

Hi I'm attempting to use ICE to be able to present all possible RTP transports to peers. 16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb11u2 (I know it's old, but unfortunately Asterisk was removed from debian 'stable' and the version in 'sid' is just broken (opus + voicemail don't work anymore). But I ran into an issue when the peer is running rtpengine: Asterisk offers: a=candidate:H9da13901

Hello, I'd appreciate your comments on the following problem I'm having, please forgive me if this is something obvious, I've been scratching my head on this for a while: I have Asterisk+Kamailio setup where I'm currently testing inbound calls from outside. I have both webrtc and sip clients, where webrtc peers are defined according to sip.js instructions (

Can anyone recommend a good WebRTC phone to use with Asterisk? I do not mind if it is commercial or open source. Customers are starting to ask for web solutions and we need to start testing. -- Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Carlos Ch?vez +52 (55)9116-91161

For the client: JSSIP and Sipml5. If you are going to be coding something up yourself I like the JSSIP 0.5.x javascript interfaces. If you are simply going to use a pre-canned one then sipml5 works pretty well and remembers your settings in localstorage. I haven't used any closed source versions since the above works really well for us. For the server: If you are using Asterisk 1.8

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Jarrod Cuzens <jarrod at mogl.com> wrote: > For those that were interested I have attached the kamailio.cfg which we > have working with Kamailio 4.2.1 and Asterisk 1.8.23/32. Specifically, the > following yum packages: > > kamailio.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 > @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms > kamailio-auth-ephemeral.x86_64

Hello, http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Letting+SIP+clients+connect+directly The link above indicates that it is possible to setup RTP streams to directly flow between endpoints and completely bypass Asterisk. I would like to know if this configuration would work when, a) both endpoints are behind NAT, and/or b) both endpoints don't support same codecs with media flowing

Greetings, I've noticed a problem that might originate from my Asterisk configuration, could use a hand in sorting it out. Problem is a 488 response from Asterisk whenever it gets RTP/SAVPF profile in the SDP. My current setup has Asterisk Kamailio realtime integration, and Kamailio uses dispatcher to route calls for Asterisk to handle. Now I have only one Asterisk, on the same machine as

I am developing apps using ARI which need suppression of DTMF tones in the audio, and I have been told (back in December) that asterisk depends on SIP providers to suppress DTMF tones in the audio stream. Having sorted out my ARI code to suppress DTMF as I wanted, it turns out that SIP providers are not very good at doing that suppression (leaving audible clicks, or failing to suppress the tones

hello, i'm facing strange problem asterisk13.5 + chan_sip wss transport + SIPML5 1.5.230 person1 to person3 are behind different NATs audio devices double checked call from person1(chrome) to person2(chrome) works call from person1(chrome) to person 3(chrome) - no audio on both side (RTP flowing only in one direction) call from person2(chrome) to person 3(chrome) - no audio on both side

The asterisk server has a permanent IP address, but the provider cannot ensure stable quality traffic for RTP. There is a desire to use an external server, the address of which shall be specified in the SDP, through which flowing media. I use asterisk 13.6 and res_pjsip. Prompt, please: 1. what software can be used on an external RTP proxy? 2. What settings need to be done in pjsip.conf to use

Hello List, I need your advise please. I am trying to establish a call from Asterisk 1.8.15-cert5 to one remote SIP UA (not Asterisk), both are behind NAT. That remote peer is configured with nat=yes in my sip.conf but yet RTP packets are being sent to its internal IP address which is declared in the Connection Information (c) in the SDP, obviously reaching nowhere. I need RTP to be sent to the

> > There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider > issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their > swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call because > then the become the responsible party for the call before the FCC, and > liable for any illegal call. Every owner of a PBX that sends calls to the >

hi guys, i have a problem with 1.8 branch no matter which release of 1.8 i'm using. i can't make any sip calls, this is the error message i get on each call: [Jan 18 19:02:15] ERROR[1698] rtp_engine.c: No RTP engine was found. Do you have one loaded? [Jan 18 19:02:15] ERROR[1698] chan_sip.c: Got SDP but have no RTP session allocated. i'm sure that the rtp engine is loaded this is the

Hi, I need clarifications on how to sell linux tools. (Though i' not sure how people ready to buy it :) ) I have written few tools and planning to write more(by giving up current non-linux & boring job). I want to know,which license will allow me to sell tools/softwares? (I hope to sell the products through online) Cheers, Lakshmipathi.G www.giis.co.in

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:44:12 -0400, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:34 PM Saint Michael <venefax at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call

Hello, I was testing with sdp and something came up worth asking: While calling from a webrtc client to another (chrome, sip.js) Asterisk receives the following sdp and rejects it with 488 Not Acceptable. Why does this happen, what's wrong with the sdp? The second sdp body below is accepted instead. Both have rtp profile RTP/SAVPF, difference is that the second one was produced by rtpengine,

My phone is located behind a NAT, 172.16.0.0/21. Asterisk 16 is on a public IP. PJSIP has the config below: force_rport=yes direct_media=yes disable_direct_media_on_nat = yes direct_media_method=invite But when I send a call I see the RTP being sent to my private address, vs the public IP. This only happens when Asterisk has dialed the call to another carrier. If instead of Dial I choose

examples of "interesting" information like ICE result and howto make "minimal" configuration of pjproject.conf i.e. for  debugging app_queue.so core set debug 5 app_queue.so for debugging RTP core set debug 10 rtp_engine core set debug 10 res_rtp_asterisk rtp set debug on logger.conf rtp => debug,verbose(5) so i mean in