similar to: PJSIP do not challenge 'options' without username. - silence 'notice' on console.

Thank you George. I will pass along the rfc information to those responsible for the other switch. I missed the match_header addition to Asterisk. Unfortunately, the only header field that seems appropriate is the To header. On a separate box I am now trying to configure the endpoint recognition. Planning on multiple endpoints to the same switch, so I am trying to use the match_header field.

Thanks George I originally didn?t have the 1002@ for the identify. Changed that when things were not working. I changed it back. Unfortunately, the system I am connecting with doesn?t seem to support the line support. Looking at the SIP packets, I see Asterisk send it. Unfortunately, they do not send the line information as part of the INVITE. I checked with some developers of that system

Hello. Asterisk 13.2. I transfer configs from chan_sip to res_pjsip. In chan_sip i have "match_auth_username=yes" and have nothing in pjsip. I have a lot of endpoints and registrations on same SIP server. And it's problem in pjsip now. Is not it? I requesting to add new value for endpoint option identify_by. The value 'uri'. Simple config (cutted): [siptrunk]

I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But I can't configure the endpoint. pjsip: [obi202-auth](!) type = auth auth_type = userpass password = <mypass> [obi202-aor](!) type = aor max_contacts = 2 ; ===== endpoints ======== [gv-voice](obi202-endpoint) auth = gv-voice aors = gv-voice identify_by=auth_username ;identify_by=username ; I also tried

Dear fellow list readers This is the situation: ISDN Devices => Patton ISDN to SIP GW => Asterisk PJSIP The Patton GW resides on a dynamic IP address, so I cannot really use match=ip in the identify section. The Patton does not send a line parameter. The ISDN Devices behind the patton have different MSN and should be able to send them in the From: Header, so the default endpoint

Hi Gang Server, two interfaces, routing to two different networks. Two transports defined, each bound to the corresponding ip assigned to the interface. But still, especially when an 183 message is sent, the Contact header does contain the wrong IP Address. Is this a known issue 13.18.3? Or is there a way to make absolutely sure the IP addresses within the Contact header is corresponding to

Hi Joshua I had a shot at your suggestion, bug still no success. I fear the 181 is sent before the macro is called. I want to change the Diversion Header in the 181 message sent back to the caller to put the number it contains in the correct e164 format (stripping the 0 and adding +41 for Switzerland) but just any 'dialplan set' value would do for an example :-) Could you please make

Hi Well it is well some time that my last DUNDI peer has become unreachable. I guess too many issues with spoofed numbers etc. But I am wondering, do people, especially larger entities like telcos, still use DUNDI? I know that in some Hamradio communities, DUNDI is used to interconnect PBXes, but that is with private phone number ranges, not connected to the public. Want some DUNDI peering?

07.03.2015 0:24, Kevin Harwell ?????: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Dmitriy Serov <serov.d.p at gmail.com > <mailto:serov.d.p at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello. > > Asterisk 13.2. > I transfer configs from chan_sip to res_pjsip. > In chan_sip i have "match_auth_username=yes" and have nothing in > pjsip. > > I have a

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 10:04 AM, sean darcy wrote: > On 4/5/19 10:36 AM, sean darcy wrote: > > I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But > > I can't configure the endpoint. > > > > pjsip: > > > > [obi202-auth](!) > > type = auth > > auth_type = userpass > > password = <mypass> > > >

Hi Joshua Thank you for your reply. Indeed, Ubuntu only ships with this old version. Upgraded to 16.2. via PPA. Problem persisted. Well, I already mentioned that this is a machine with two physical interfaces with different routes which on the 'external' side handles SIP customer registrations and has an 'internal' IC Trunk to a commercial Voice Switch via private IP Range. I

Hi Gang To increase security against phished passwords and similar attacks, we consider offering customers to define IP ranges (or GeoIP locations) from which their dynamic registrations are being accepted. I can already look at the source IP in the dial plan, so no issue with validate an INVITE against a source IP. But I would also like to prevent registrations from outside of this

Hi List Implementing screening and routing I have stumbled over this issue: [pbx-router] exten => s,1,NoOp(ROUTER FROM: ${CALLERID(Number)} TO: ${DESTINATION}) same => n,Set(SOURCE=${CHANNEL(name)}) same => n,Set(PAI=${PJSIP_HEADER(read,P-Asserted-Identity)}) same => n,Set(FROM=${CALLERID(Number)}) same => n,Set(TO=${DESTINATION}) same

Hi Gang I gave up on running asterisk with two interfaces without it mixing up the ip addresses. So I have removed one transport definition from pjsip.conf Now * keeps complaining: res_pjsip.c:3461 ast_sip_set_tpselector_from_transport_name: Unable to retrieve PJSIP transport 'transport-name' I did a grep on /etc/asterisk for that transport name. It's in any file anymore.

Hi Gang According to: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+13+Configuration_res_pjsip#Asterisk12Configuration_res_pjsip-endpoint_device_state_busy_at And endpoint should return busy if this number is reached. We have PBX Trunks registering to the Asterisk. So we want to limit the number of concurrent calls to a PBX and return busy, if more than the configured number of channels

Hi Gang I have stumbled of this problem. I need the P-Asserted-Identity header in an AGI scrip. In the Dial-Plan I do: same => n,Set(PAI=${PJSIP_HEADER(read,P-Asserted-Identity)}) In the AGI I do: my $pai = $AGI->get_variable(PAI); This works fine, unless the PAI contains quotes: P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:1000 at 1.2.3.4:5060;user=phone> I get "<sip:1000 at

Hi List I wonder how SIP via TCP is supposed to work. Not realy Asterisk related, but I hope you experts might be able to help out :-) One of our customers has a SIP device registering via a complex NAT. To benefit from TCP Connection Tracking, he choose TCP instead of UDP. So he expected, that an incoming call would be sent back to him on the already open TCP connection, making it easy to get

Hi List We have some CPE which run an embedded asterisk 13 with chan_sip. Unfortunately, when a registration is rejected, those stop trying. I am familiar with pjsip which allows to configure: auth_rejection_permanent=no How do I achieve the same with chan_sip? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden

Hi List One more Problem I stumbled upon. Using Asterisk in a TSP environement. Incomming IC Calls are e164 and have a NPRN (Routing Number) prefixed. Example: +4198055615995555 +41 country prefix 98055 Routing Prefix 615995555 effective phone number Calls routed to Customers need to be put in the 'local' format. 0615995555 This is also the format of the From / To / Invite header

Hi List I have been pondering over a problem to use an asterisk server behind an SBC unable to successfully handle registrations. Now I observed something strange which I suspect might be a bug on the asterisk side. The SBC originates is register from Port 6011 to Port 5060 on the Asterisk. The Contact Header of the REGISTER contains: Contact: user at SBC-IP:6011 The Asterisk is sending the