similar to: TLS/SSL error loading cert file. </etc/asterisk/keys/asterisk.pem>

Hello, Le lun. 6 janv. 2020 à 19:01, Olivier <oza.4h07 at gmail.com> a écrit : > May I add I could successfully (if pjsip show transports has any meaning) > add a PJSIP TLS-transport with: > > [transport-tls] > type=transport > protocol=tls > bind=0.0.0.0:5061 > cert_file=/etc/asterisk/keys/asterisk.crt > priv_key_file=/etc/asterisk/keys/asterisk.key >

May I add I could successfully (if pjsip show transports has any meaning) add a PJSIP TLS-transport with: [transport-tls] type=transport protocol=tls bind=0.0.0.0:5061 cert_file=/etc/asterisk/keys/asterisk.crt priv_key_file=/etc/asterisk/keys/asterisk.key method=tlsv1 Le lun. 6 janv. 2020 à 18:33, Olivier <oza.4h07 at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hello, > > On a newly re-installed

Hello, After countless hours on, this I found the root cause of HTTPS settings on Debian Buster. All this came from ast_tls_cert script using 1024 bits-long keys where Debian's defaut was to require at least 2048-long keys ! Simply passing -b 2048 to ast_tls_cert solved it. 1. May I suggest mentioning explicitly this possibility in wiki page [1] ? 2. What would you say of adding an extra

In the asterisk wiki instructions for Configuring Asterisk for WebRTC clients... https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Configuring+Asterisk+for+WebRTC+Clients "To communicate with websocket clients, Asterisk uses its built-in HTTP daemon. Configure /etc/asterisk/http.conf as follows: [general] enabled=yes bindaddr=0.0.0.0 bindport=8088 tlsenable=yes tlsbindaddr=0.0.0.0:8089

Hi Alexey, This is what works for me: [http.conf]: tlsenable=yes ; enable tls - default no. tlsbindaddr=144.x.y.z:8089 ; address and port to bind to - default is bindaddr and port 8089. tlscertfile=/etc/asterisk/keys/mycert.pem ; path to the certificate file (*.pem) only. tlsprivatekey=/etc/asterisk/keys/mycert.pem ; path to private key file (*.pem) only. Date: Tue, 13 Jan

CentOS-6.5 (FreePBX-2.6) Asterisk-11.14.2 (FreePBX) snom870-SIP 8.7.3.25.5 I am having a very difficult time attempting to get TLS and SRTP working with Asterisk and anything else. At the moment I am trying to get TLS functioning with our Snom870 desk-sets. And I am not having much luck. Since this is an extraordinarily (to me) Byzantine environemnt I am going to ask if any of you have gotten

hi, i'm fighting with webrtc for 14 days reporting my experience to minimize number of crazy asterisk users i have working webrtc with simpl5 + asterisk 13 + pjproject 2.4.5 + chan_pjsip + secure websockets + secure audio + audio in both ways problems first, i needed run chan_sip for old hard phones and wss with chan_pjsip only for webrtc. this is possible with patch from

Hello, Reading [1], I would be happy to discuss here, the changes bellow. 1. In "Create certificate" section, instead of 'ls -w 1 /etc/asterisk/keys', could a 'ls -l /etc/asterisk/keys' be used ? This would help to check file permissions. If possible, having those file permissions shown when Asterisk is run as asterisk:asterisk would be very helpful. 2. Instead of a

Hello, I've installed a new Asterisk 17.0.0 on a Debian Buster system. This Asterisk instance is run by asterisk user (and group). I've got: # ls -l /etc/asterisk total 68 -rw-r--r-- 1 asterisk asterisk 501 nov. 18 19:12 asterisk.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 asterisk asterisk 135 nov. 18 18:57 cdr.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 asterisk asterisk 684 nov. 18 18:57 cdr_custom.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 asterisk

Hello R users, I have to import a file with one column containing dates written in French short format, such as: 7-d?c-07 11-d?c-07 14-d?c-07 18-d?c-07 21-d?c-07 24-d?c-07 26-d?c-07 28-d?c-07 31-d?c-07 2-janv-08 4-janv-08 7-janv-08 9-janv-08 11-janv-08 14-janv-08 16-janv-08 18-janv-08 There are other columns for other (numeric) variables in the

Hi Trying to get rcov going (has been working), but with the following context and specs it fails. context ''/account POST with invalid attendee'' do controller_name :account setup do Attendee.stub!(:create!).and_raise(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid.new( Attendee.new)) end specify ''should raise on create'' do Attendee.should_receive(:create!).with({

On a rather full customer web server, I am trying to track down whose web site script is trying to make outbound network connections when they should not be. In /etc/security/audit_control, I added to the flags line dir:/var/audit flags:lo,aa,-nt minfree:5 to log failed network connection. When I try an make an outbound connection to something that is blocked in pf, it seems to sometimes work.

Hello, I am trying to secure SIP session with TLS on Asterisk Server 1.8. I keep getter an error, == Problem setting up ssl connection: error:14094418:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert unknown ca [2016-05-04 09:31:17] WARNING[30032]: tcptls.c:254 handle_tcptls_connection: FILE * open failed! I tried both signed and self-signed cert to no avail. Here is my Configuration: Sip.conf

That’s a good question, by default when emitting the object file I choose COFF but it embeds dwarf and not codeview in the end.. there probably is a way to do it or at least it must be implemented if not yet.. Lets imagine I manage to do that.. when you say there is nothing to do, I still must have a PDBFileBuilder to copy the codeview data inside the EXE PDB right ? I cannot insert them easily in

Hi Joshua Thank you for your reply. Indeed, Ubuntu only ships with this old version. Upgraded to 16.2. via PPA. Problem persisted. Well, I already mentioned that this is a machine with two physical interfaces with different routes which on the 'external' side handles SIP customer registrations and has an 'internal' IC Trunk to a commercial Voice Switch via private IP Range. I

Ok I understand more what you meant. In fact I don’t care about the pdb size, at least as a first step, so it won’t be a problem for me to have duplicated symbols. Concerning TypeIndices my plan if possible is not to generate a pdb for my jit and merge it, but instead directly extract debug info from a DwarfContext just after llvm::object::ObjectFile is emitted by the JIT engine and complete the

Ok I see.. what do you mean by “making sure to de-duplicate records as necessary” ? Le jeu. 17 janv. 2019 à 19:09, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> a écrit : > It's possible in theory to support incremental updates to a PDB (the file > format is designed specifically with that in mind). But this functionality > was never added to the PDB library since lld doesn't

I seem to be missing something because I am at a loss on how to get rcov, RSpec, and Rails working together. Would someone mind dropping some hints?

Hi Zachary ! If there a way to easily create a new PDBFileBuilder from an existing PDBFile or can/should I do the translation myself ? I would like to start from a builder filled with the EXE PDB data and then complete its DBI stream with the JIT module/symbols. Thanks ! Le mer. 16 janv. 2019 à 23:41, Vivien Millet <vivien.millet at gmail.com> a écrit : > Thank you Zachary ! > I

Hello Zachary, Sorry for replying so lately but It's been a week I'm thinking an working hard on your "dll memory buffer" idea to see if it works and give you feedbacks ! And it works pretty well until now : I shared on the list what I did : - create a .ASM file full of "int 3" instructions (to ensure that if we execute over the boundaries we instantly break. -