similar to: PJSIP wizard reload not reloading ?

Hi list, Using Asterisk 16.1.1, with PJSIP, I'm asked to build a SIP trunk to a system that uses exclusively tel: uri on inbound and outbound calls. I could not find documentation or sample config about tel:uri. Is this doable? If not possible with PJSIP, is chan_sip a better option? Any pointer would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes

Hey All, For those of you that do not know me, my name is Matthew Fredrickson and I’m the project lead for the Asterisk project. First off, I wanted to thank all of you that contribute in various ways to the project – whether it be at a developmental level, answering questions on forums and mailing lists, contributing documentation, or just generally advocating for it within your sphere of

Hello Jean-Denis. I believe the idea is that you answer the survey for each type of scenarios you are running. So one for call centre, another one for ivr, etc... Regards, Marcelo On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, 02:10 Jean-Denis Girard, <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I would have loved to participate to the survey, but I feel it does > apply to my situation: as an

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, 2 weks ago I asked questions about PJSIP and T.38 but got no replies. I upgraded Asterisk to git as of yesterday (309dd2a), and I'm still having the same issues. In the trace below, I'm sending a fax from Hylafax server through iaxmodem on Asterisk-13 (tiare) to a second Asterisk (11.18.0 t0gw) connected to the PSTN via ISDN; the

On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:40 PM Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > There seems to be a problem with the tar.gz archive on github. It's > correct on downloads.asterisk.org. Can you be more specific? They are identical and the same tarball. I just downloaded both from each place and confirmed that, and confirmed they both extract fine. -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love

Le 07/07/2023 à 12:49, Joshua C. Colp a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:40 PM Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf > <mailto:jd.girard at sysnux.pf>> wrote: > > There seems to be a problem with the tar.gz archive on github. It's > correct on downloads.asterisk.org <http://downloads.asterisk.org>. > > > Can you be more specific?

Up till now, I have only used Asterisk versions 1.2, 10 and 11, on CentOS 4, 5 and 6, and have made extensive use of AMI and FastAGI connections to a multi-threaded backend written in C. For a new project, I am looking at trying Asterisk 16 with ARI, on CentOS 7. I was looking at the various ARI libraries available, particularly the ones for Python and Node.js in github. I noticed that the

I'm compiling an Asterisk system on a ESXi VM with recent CPU, but will deploy onto an old ESXi VM with older CPU. Is it possible to configure Asterisk to NOT use CPU specific instructions/optimizations so that the executable is portable? Thanks Dan (in learning mode) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello Asterisk, New install. Current Fedora server. Current Asterisk V16 Installed everything necessary to run configure including uuid and uuid-devel. I know everything but uuid works as I commented out the uuid test and configure finished. Make fails with uuid/uuid.h not found. uuid/uuid.h is not there, but uuid.h is there. Tried changing <uuid/uuid,h> to <uuid.h> in uuid.c

Hello Jean-Denis, Thursday, February 28, 2019, 7:39:58 PM, you wrote: > Asterisk-16.2.1 builds without error here on Fedora 29, with stock > libuuid-2.32.1-1.fc29.x86_64 and > libuuid-devel-2.32.1-1.fc29.x86_64 > installed. Thanks so much. When I first saw this I was like, yea but it doesn't work here so what, but then I sent your message it to that computer and stared at it for

There seems to be a problem with the tar.gz archive on github. It's correct on downloads.asterisk.org. Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française https://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 40.50.10.40 / GSM: +689 87.797.527 Le 07/07/2023 à 10:10, Asterisk Development Team a écrit : > The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for your reply Larry. Le 27/07/2015 01:22, Larry Moore a ?crit : > I think the "488 Not acceptable here" is occurring because the channel > connecting through is not T.38 capable, that will be the IAX channel > from iaxmomdem. This is what T38gateway is supposed to do. And I'm very happy to report that after one more

Hi list, I have a request to integrate Iridium in a Asterisk system. A quick search didn't return much: I expected to find products similar to GSM gateways, but this does not seem to exist. so I'd be very interested about possible solutions. Has it be done already, how? Thanks, -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Syst?mes Linux en Polyn?sie fran?aise

Hello, We have a provider which is using Kamailio as front end. Our asterisk 13/chan_sip server has no problem to register and pass/receive calls form this provider. Now we want to move to asterisk 16/pjsip and face problem. Registration is OK but when we pass a call our INVITE never receive answer from the provider. We opened a ticket to their support but in the mean time we want to know

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce security release Asterisk 20.3.1. The release artifacts are available for immediate download at https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/20.3.1 and https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The following security advisories were resolved in this release:

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce security release Asterisk 20.3.1. The release artifacts are available for immediate download at https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/20.3.1 and https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The following security advisories were resolved in this release:

Hi, Is it possible to both use Digium B410P and bristuff'ed 1.4 Asterisk, now ? I've heard BRI support in Asterisk is about to change with 1.6 but I'm not sure I understood what the plan is. If someone has a clue, l would delighted to learn about it. Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > Hi, > > Le 07/03/2016 09:28, George Joseph a ?crit : > > PLEASE TRY THIS!! I'd love some feedback BEFORE 13.8.0 is released. > > I have tried GIT-master-ee5a944M on my Fedora 23 test server, and got: > > [pjproject] Unpacking /tmp/pjproject-2.4.5.tar.bz2 > [pjproject]

I am trying to use dahdi complete 2.11.1 with a 4.13 kernel. - NOT working for know reasons. I tried applying two patches but still get compile errors. AHHH! How do I just use git to get the latest with the fixes ???? This command did not work - I still get the errors. git clone git://git.asterisk.org/dahdi/linux dahdi-linux Thanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML