similar to: Second Asterisk server SIP JOIN a call to conduct a post-call survey

Dear Colleagues/Developers/R enthusiasts, Would it be possible to develop a code of conduct (CoC) document for R lists, CRAN submissions that all developers/maintainers to follow? This may help all of us to better communicate and move forward together. There is a similar effort from Python community, here are the links: * https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/2017-August/022044.html *

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +1 to the general idea of a CoC > > A couple of specific thoughts: > > 1) It would have been nice for this not to appeared out of thin air. In an ideal world, a previous update would have mentioned ongoing thought and research in this area. > Some back story here. I

Hi R users, I request members of the R community to consider filling a short survey regarding the use of R. The survey can be found at http://goo.gl/jw1ig Please accept my apologies for posting here for a non-technical reason. The data collected will be suitably analyzed and I'll post a link to the results in the coming weeks. Thank you all for your interest and for sharing your R usage

On 14 October 2015 at 20:35, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Related specifically to the developers meeting, we are growing quite > rapidly. For the past few years, we have been increasing our attendance from > 50 at the start to now over 350 attendees. With this many people (and many > new to the community), it seems important to have a code of

Dear there, I am working on the NHANES survey data, and want to apply quantile regression on these complex survey data. Does anyone know how to do this? Thank you in advance, Yiling Cheng Yiling J. Cheng MD, PhD Epidemiologist CoCHP, Division of Diabetes Translation Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4770 Buford Highway, N.E. Mailstop K-10 Atlanta, GA 30341 [[alternative HTML

Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and

Hi, I am a long time SPSS user but new to R, so please bear with me if my questions seem to be too basic for you guys. I am trying to figure out how to analyze survey data using logistic regression with multiple imputation. I have a survey data of about 200,000 cases and I am trying to predict the odds ratio of a dependent variable using 6 categorical independent variables (dummy-coded).

Chandler, It's been 5 months since the last update I've seen on the proposed Code of Conduct. What is the current status of this? I'd really like to see the Code of Conduct committed. Last I recall, we still had some serious concerns and ongoing discussion about the Reporting Policy - I think you had a new draft to send out? - but the CoC had gotten pretty wide agreement. Can

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:50 PM Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > - Is this trying to change how the community behaves? I think the > resounding > > answer is no, this is very much meant to formalize the existing extremely > > polite and respectful behavior that the LLVM community has had for many > > years. > > This is crucial IMHO

> Also, the problem with enumerating all the inacceptable behaviour is > that the text tends to become TL;DR. Which means permanent discomfort: I > never fully read the rules, so I'm never fully sure that I'm not > violating the CoC, nor am I sure whether others violate it. > > In terms of size and complexity, the proposed CoC is shorter than the > typical bulletin

I have looked through the new "Complex Surveys" book and the documentation for the "survey" package and it appears to me that there are no functions in "survey" that help one to design a sampling scheme. For example, in the book section 2.8 discusses the design of stratified samples, but there is no mention of any functions in the "survey" package that

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > | It's not sanely possible to enumerate all the possibilities > > Not looking for that. Looking to avoid being trolled. ("Trolled" isn't > the right word here but I've lost track of what the right one is. Hopefully > my intent is clear enough.) > I'm really not

Hello, I use google docs' Forms to conduct surveys online. Multiple choices questions are coded as comma separated values. For example, if the question is like: 1. What magazines do you currently subscribe to? (you can choose multiple choices) 1) Fast Company 2) Havard Business Review 3) Business Week 4) The Economist And if the subject chose 1) and 3), the data is coded as a cell in a

On 5/5/2016 4:19 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > Having a code of conduct like this is just as bad as having no code of conduct at all. It trivializes the importance of a code of conduct and its pretty much impossible to enforce. Code of conduct should reflect the community standards, not define them. These standards come from the minds of the members of the community. A CoC that

This actually was discussed at EuroLLVM. Several other things were occupying my time that have in the last month cleared out, and I'm expecting to have an update to the CoC stuff in the next few weeks. It hasn't been forgotten though. =] On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:20 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Chandler, > > It's been 5 months

Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > I want to be super clear, the foundation is not insisting on anything, nor > can it. > > **I** am making this proposal as an active and long time contributor to > LLVM. Many other members of the community have also expressed support for > this on this and previous threads. But our support is given as

Proposed alternative DRAFT -------------------------- LLVM Code of Conduct (LCoC) Prologue: LLVM community as a whole strives for equality and respect in all areas. With this in mind, we want to establish a few words that help(s)? everyone understand what to do if there is ever questions or conflicts. Motto: Be respectful, have fun and do great engineering. LLVM Community members: People in

Hi, R Lovers! I have some survey data. I'd like to run R or R packages for processing data inputted from AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) survey. Are there any R packages or subsititues for running data from AHP survey. Thanks in advance, -- Kum-Hoe Hwang, Ph.D.Phone : 82-31-250-3516 Email : phdhwang@gmail.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi R users, I am trying to use the aggregate function with a survey design object and survey functions, but get the following error. I think I am incorrectly using the syntax somehow, and it may not be possible to access variables directly by name in a survey-design object. Am I right? How do I fix this problem? I have used aggregate with "mean" and "weighted.mean", and

> Your report will still be kept confidential exactly as above, but also > feel free to (anonymously if needed) email conduct at llvm.org if needed. I have slight reservations towards this. A general conduct email is good, but there are cases where you would like to contact individuals. This is for example, when the report goes against a member of the conduct team itself or the LLVM core