similar to: Running wine from php pages

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:11 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> writes: > > Thanks for writing this up. I think it's a really important point which > > deserves discussion. > > > > Ultimately, I think it is a question as to whether to prioritize the easy > > switchover for existing out of

Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > If you want a monorepo view for all of your branches' histories > > too it's more involved, but I'm not sure anyone really needs > > that. In any case, even if someone does want that the nature of > > the zipper approach means it could be done later > > non-destructively. >

I don't feel like I can unilaterally declare this topic closed, since there was an objection to that last time. But with no additional feedback after another week, I'd still really like to close this out, and start moving forward with the original plan, again... On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:28 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > It's been a week and a half more

Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: > I'll write up some more detailed docs on this, but all you need to do is > a subtree merge to one of the zippered commits. This will then prevent git-biisect from working properly, unfortunately. Maybe most people don't need it be we should be aware of and communicate the tradeoffs. > If you want a monorepo view for all

Yes, I’m still trying to evaluate the migration script’s downsides as compared to the zipper approach’s downsides. Sorry that I got a little held up, but I have to balance evaluating this with getting other work done. I should have some feedback to a few of the responses on this thread next week. I really don’t think I can respond in a useful/productive way before I’ve finished these

Thanks for writing this up. I think it's a really important point which deserves discussion. Ultimately, I think it is a question as to whether to prioritize the easy switchover for existing out of tree forks, or to prioritize having the best conversion we can make. I feel very strongly that the latter should be the priority for the official repository conversion, and that, therefore, we

Windows QXL drivers include also qxldd.dll which used to get filtered out and not copied over into the guest. As a result QXL driver failed to install due to a missing file. Correct that, and update the tests accordingly. Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com> --- v2v/fake-virtio-win/drivers/i386/Win7/qxldd.dll | 1 + v2v/test-v2v-in-place.sh | 1 +

Dear Amit, thanks for your fast reply. I am a bit surprised that you answer in HTML and doing TOFU despite that you come from a readhat.com mailbox. ;) On 2017-03-21 18:42 amit kumar <amitkuma at redhat.com> wrote: > Try this config I can not see a relevant difference between your config and mine. Can you explain which part of it would do the job? > workgroup = WORKGROUP set

Hi all (and best wishes for the new year to everyone :-) ) I have currently a Samba 3.5.6 server that acts as a PDC and print Server, with tdbsam backend, no LDAP at all. In a very next future, I will have to migrate samba to a new server (a VM actually). This migration will have to be seamless for all users (more than 200 user accounts with more than 200 PC in the domain). The

Hello, Up till a few months ago I had no problems sending popup messages to windows-xp pcs like this: echo "New fax arrived $pages pages" | /usr/bin/smbclient -U FAX -M jo >>/tmp/smbclient.log Lately however this does not work anymore. The log file contains nothing at all. This was still with samba 2.2.3 on an readhat 7.2 server. I'm not really aware of chagend to the

hello, i rsynced a kvm vm from one host to another. i start virt-manager and tell virt-manager to use an existing disk. i set cpu to haswell that is on the host. configure before start is set, and i start "begin installation". I get this output by virt-manager: Unable to complete install: 'internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: 2017-07-19T09:27:10.861928Z

Hi, Thanks for starting this discussion Justin! On 10/31/18 5:22 PM, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi all, > > I've spent some time in the last couple of days trying to figure out how > to adopt the [LLVM git monorepo prototype] for an out of tree backend. > TLDR: I'm not convinced that this prototype is the right approach to > converting to the monorepo, and I

Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: R v1.7.0 OS: WinXP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.2.229) There seems to be an upper limit of the number of files (approx 1000 files) a zip-file can contain when unpacking it with zip.unpack(). This results in an R crash. This bug is urgent since install.packages() relies on zip.unpack() and too big packages/bundles won't install with the current R

Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > Yes, but that's the case for the zipper repo anyway: one merge per > commit. The point is that the second commit is just a trivial merge, > it wouldn't show up in a file `git log` for example. > In the linear rewritten monorepo, adding the history taken from the > existing git mirror would lead to duplicated commits, as

Dear all: I have been thinking to import below one data file (.txt)into R by read.table(..,skip=1, header=T). But How can I deal with the repeated rows of TABLE NO.1 and names of data variables in the middle of this data file. The similar block will be repeated 100 times, here only show 4 of them and within each block, data records also can vary, here only paste 4 rows for example. I appreciate

Dear all: I have been thinking to import below one data file (.txt)into R by read.table(..,skip=1, header=T). But How can I deal with the repeated rows of TABLE NO.1 and names of data variables in the middle of this data file. The similar block will be repeated 100 times, here only show 4 of them and within each block, data records also can vary, here only paste 4 rows for example. I appreciate

Hi everyone, I am using libvirt 2.5.0. I'd like to enable the "perf events" to monitoring my vm performance such as l3 cache. But it failed with "error: argument unsupported: unable to enable host cpu perf event for cmt". 1. Could you please give some hints on how to check if my host CPU supports cmt,mbm, is it displayed in /proc/cpuinfo? 2. Does the kernel version matters

I just want to point out that the issue of incompatible history is not new. This has been getting discussed all the way back in July 2016. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102657.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-July/102657.html> As James said in that email: > That we'll be getting incompatible history has been glossed over, and it is >

Hola, Por favor, necesito insertar una fila debajo de las filas que tengan DV distinto de cero, pero no me deja insertar hasta el final de la tabla. Esta es mi tabla y este es el código con el que estoy apurado. C ID TIME DV AMT RATE CMT SS II EVID GRUPO VISITA DOSIS VECES FORMA NAP EDAD SEXO ALTURA PESO 11 0 0 3 0 1 1 12 1 3 0 3 2 1 0 77 2 147 74 11 1.417 0.001 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 3 2 1 0.001

Hey Y'all, I'm looking at ZCad: http://sourceforge.net/projects/zcad/?source=directory It looks like the kind of 3D CAD package that I've been looking for. It says that it works on Linux but it's zipped with 7-Zip which doesn't seem to be available for CentOS. Does anyone know if ZCAD or 7-Zip is packaged for CentOS X86-64 somewhere out there? -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^