Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "getting invites to rtp ports ??"
2018 Aug 29
2
getting invites to rtp ports ??
On 08/29/2018 09:42 AM, Carlos Rojas wrote:
> Hi
>
> Probably somebody is trying to hack your system, you should block that
> ip on your firewall.
>
> Regards
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:34 AM, sean darcy <seandarcy2 at gmail.com
> <mailto:seandarcy2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm getting invites to very high ports every 30 seconds from a
2018 Aug 29
3
getting invites to rtp ports ??
On 08/29/2018 11:59 AM, Telium Support Group wrote:
> Block a single IP is the wrong approach (whack-a-mole). You should consider a more comprehensive approach to securing your VoIP environment. Have a look at this wiki:
>
> https://www.voip-info.org/asterisk-security/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at
2018 Aug 30
2
getting invites to rtp ports ??
I wonder if I could have that patch, maybe I could add it to my
fail2ban regexp and if you have the correct regexp, I would apperciate
that as well.
Thanks.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 19:18:29 -0400,
Telium Support Group wrote:
>
> Depending on log trolling (Asterisk security log) misses a lot, and also depends on the SIP/PJSIP folks to not change message structure (which has already happened
2018 Aug 30
2
getting invites to rtp ports ??
OK, Thanks. I have a couple of questions -- the line numbers do not
match exactly, so can you tell me a couple of lines before and after
the line in question? Also, when will this be logged, if its only
during sip debug, I need to change it to log when I can see it more
readily.
Thanks.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:31:15 -0400,
sean darcy wrote:
>
> On 08/29/2018 08:07 PM, John Covici wrote:
2018 Aug 30
6
getting invites to rtp ports ??
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:20 PM Telium Support Group <support at telium.ca>
wrote:
> Depending on log trolling (Asterisk security log) misses a lot, and also
> depends on the SIP/PJSIP folks to not change message structure (which has
> already happened numerous time). If you are comfortable hacking
> chan_sip.c you may prefer to get the same messages from the AMI. It still
2018 Sep 09
2
getting invites to rtp ports ??
Hi. So, I applied the patch, works, but I could not figure out a
fail2ban regex which will hit that line, have you got one I can use?
Thanks.
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:03:08 -0400,
sean darcy wrote:
>
> On 08/29/2018 09:33 PM, John Covici wrote:
> > OK, Thanks. I have a couple of questions -- the line numbers do not
> > match exactly, so can you tell me a couple of lines before
2007 May 28
2
Yearly statistics
Dear R-experts,
Sorry if I've overlooked a simple solution here. I have calculated a
proportion of the number of observations which meet a criteria, applied to
five years of data. How can I break down this proportion statistic for each
year?
For example (data in zoo format):
open high low close hc lc
2004-12-29 4135 4135 4106 4116 8 -21
2004-12-30 4120 4131
2020 Apr 20
0
What are "non critical" invites?
Hi All
I'm getting tens of thousands of these messages ever hour in the Asterisk
CLI for Asterisk 13.22.0:
[Apr 20 15:59:46] WARNING[45462]: chan_sip.c:4127 retrans_pkt: Timeout on
1924200000-502043860-301870737 on non-critical invite transaction.
[Apr 20 15:59:46] WARNING[45462]: chan_sip.c:4127 retrans_pkt: Timeout on
301794058-652332923-1834701069 on non-critical invite transaction.
[Apr
2013 May 13
3
ZFS on Linux + ACLs
Hello,
Does anyone test ZFS on Linux and ACLs?
I can't setup POSIX ACLs and any extended even using acl_xattr or
acl_tdb.
Is any way to use ACLs with ZFS on Linux (Samba 3 or 4)?
Best regards
/Adrian Berlin
--
2015 Jan 23
2
Easiest way to compile dovecot on Ubuntu 14.04
Dear Marc.
Thanks =)
Already have dovecot-solr installed.
Is there a way to see if dovecot-solr is actually working?
Thanks
Kevin
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Marc St?rmer <mail at marc-stuermer.de> wrote:
>
> Zitat von Kevin Laurie <superinterstellar at gmail.com>:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> I need to recompile dovecot on ubuntu 14.04
>> What would be
2010 Jun 29
1
Problem with GoToIfTime
Hello list,
why is it that GoToIfTime thinks a date of **|*|29-*|jun *is not valid ??
[Jun 29 14:06:34] -- Executing [s at macro-vac:10]
*GotoIfTime*("SIP/testcorp-00000036", "**|*|29-*|jun*?onvac") in new stack
[Jun 29 14:06:34] WARNING[3076]: pbx.c:4127 get_range: Invalid end day
'*', assuming none
[Jun 29 14:06:34] -- Executing [s at macro-vac:11]
2017 Apr 19
2
[PATCH] lib: direct: Remove support for virtio-blk as the default.
virtio-scsi has been supported in qemu since 2012, and it is superior
in every respect to virtio-blk. There's no reason to still be using
virtio-blk.
virtio-scsi support was initially added in 2012
(commit 0c0a7d0d868d153adf0600189f771459e1068b0a).
You can still use virtio-blk using the (deprecated) iface parameter,
but don't do that in new code.
---
lib/guestfs-internal.h | 1 -
2019 Jan 14
2
[FTS Xapian] Beta release
Thank you. Here is the stack trace with all debug symbols:
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: bt.txt
URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190114/76bcc796/attachment-0001.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
> On 14. Jan 2019, at 11:07, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote:
2019 Jan 14
2
[FTS Xapian] Beta release
OK, got it (my fault, as always, put the LimitCORE in the wrong line). Here is the stack trace:
> On 14. Jan 2019, at 10:33, Joan Moreau via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
> Difficult to figure out without a coredump + gdb
>
>
>
> I have also battled quite a lot to make sure dovecot can core dump on my Archlinux servers.
>
> I remember that the
2015 Jun 20
2
Duplicate mails with pop3 + dsync replication
Hi,
When I enable (and it only happens when it is actually running) replication over TCP my users get duplicate mails via pop3.
Here?s what happens:
* User gets mail
* Mail appears in (Maildir) new/ folder on both replicas
* user retrieves mail (retr), calls dele. Mail still exists in new/ folder on both replicas.
* user runs retr (and gets the duplicate) and dele a second time, the mail is
2010 Apr 02
6
L2ARC & Workingset Size
Hi all
I ran a workload that reads & writes within 10 files each file is 256M, ie,
(10 * 256M = 2.5GB total Dataset Size).
I have set the ARC max size to 1 GB on etc/system file
In the worse case, let us assume that the whole dataset is hot, meaning my
workingset size= 2.5GB
My SSD flash size = 8GB and being used for L2ARC
No slog is used in the pool
My File system record size = 8K ,
2012 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] Setting up a cross-compiler for cortex-m3
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote:
> IIRC, it took him a week or so to do all that, and months waiting for
> answers, then years waiting for more answers. It was more than just
> tests, and until today I have no idea what it was... There was always
> something wrong but no one could tell what, but it stopped the patch
> anyway.
2003 Oct 12
1
Error openning file (PR#4550)
Full_Name: Adolfo Jiménez Pérez
Version: 1.8.0 (2003-10-08)
OS: Window'98 2ed
Submission from: (NULL) (81.203.134.156)
I've a crash when reading a specific file with the command:
> read.table("file.dat")
This file can be readed with the 1.1.1 version using the same command and R
reads it correctly.
The content file is this:
---->file beginning<---------
2019 Jul 15
2
Error since Dovecot v2.3.7
Hi,
since upgrading to Dovecot 2.3.7 I get the following new errors:
2019-07-15 09:10:52 mail dovecot: imap(paul at iwascoding.com)<32484><goWh8rKNSNZfqJ9R>: Error: file_lock_free(): Unexpectedly failed to retry locking /var/spool/mail/iwascoding/paul/mdbox/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails/dovecot-vsize.lock:
2013 Feb 13
2
rsync'ing samba shares
I know this has come up a bit in the past, but consider this
situation:
Two Samba4 DC's - and I want to "mirror" the data shares to the
"backup" DC in case we lose the primary DC and it's file shares.
[A cheap, dirty, poor-mans semi-CTDB. How did you ever guess that Red
Green was helping me?!]
The easiest way is probably rsync'ing the data.
However, will that