similar to: Community forum ?

Is the list going to be the same after sangoma take over digium? On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 12:05 PM, sean darcy wrote: > > I see a lot of tag lines on posts for the Asterisk Community Forum. Is > > that forum supposed to supersede this mailing list ? > > Both remain available but the community

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:20 PM Telium Support Group <support at telium.ca> wrote: > Depending on log trolling (Asterisk security log) misses a lot, and also > depends on the SIP/PJSIP folks to not change message structure (which has > already happened numerous time). If you are comfortable hacking > chan_sip.c you may prefer to get the same messages from the AMI. It still

On 08/29/2018 11:59 AM, Telium Support Group wrote: > Block a single IP is the wrong approach (whack-a-mole). You should consider a more comprehensive approach to securing your VoIP environment. Have a look at this wiki: > > https://www.voip-info.org/asterisk-security/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at

OK, Thanks. I have a couple of questions -- the line numbers do not match exactly, so can you tell me a couple of lines before and after the line in question? Also, when will this be logged, if its only during sip debug, I need to change it to log when I can see it more readily. Thanks. On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:31:15 -0400, sean darcy wrote: > > On 08/29/2018 08:07 PM, John Covici wrote:

I wonder if I could have that patch, maybe I could add it to my fail2ban regexp and if you have the correct regexp, I would apperciate that as well. Thanks. On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 19:18:29 -0400, Telium Support Group wrote: > > Depending on log trolling (Asterisk security log) misses a lot, and also depends on the SIP/PJSIP folks to not change message structure (which has already happened

I'm getting invites to very high ports every 30 seconds from a particular ip address: Retransmitting #10 (NAT) to 5.199.133.128:52734: SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 0.0.0.0:52734;branch=z9hG4bK1207255353;received=5.199.133.128;rport=52734 From: <sip:37120116780191250 at 67.80.191.250>;tag=1872048972 To: <sip:3712011972592181418 at 67.80.191.250>;tag=as3a52e748

On 08/29/2018 09:42 AM, Carlos Rojas wrote: > Hi > > Probably somebody is trying to hack your system, you should block that > ip on your firewall. > > Regards > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:34 AM, sean darcy <seandarcy2 at gmail.com > <mailto:seandarcy2 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I'm getting invites to very high ports every 30 seconds from a

asterisk-16.13.0-rc2. Fedora 32 pjsip won't load because of undefined symbols: [Sep 4 14:19:25] ERROR[141137]: loader.c:2396 load_modules: Error loading module 'func_pjsip_aor.so': /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/func_pjsip_aor.so: undefined symbol: ast_sip_location_retrieve_aor_contacts [Sep 4 14:19:25] ERROR[141137]: loader.c:2396 load_modules: Error loading module

Hello, I think I met a case similar to the one solved by [1] . Quoting this case : * res_pjsip: Handle deferred SDP hold/unhold properly. Some SIP devices indicate hold/unhold using deferred SDP reinvites. In other words, they provide no SDP in the reinvite. A typical transaction that starts hold might look something like this: * Device sends reinvite with no SDP * Asterisk

Hey all! I recently tried the dtmf_mode "auto_info" on my setup to support endpoints that only understand SIP INFO as a fallback. My setup is the following: Endpoint A (RFC4733) --> Asterisk <-- Endpoint B (SIP INFO) Both are configured with "auto_info" dtmf_mode in pjsip.conf. What I ran into is, that DTMF sent from endpoint A to endpoint B is additionally sent via

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 10:04 AM, sean darcy wrote: > On 4/5/19 10:36 AM, sean darcy wrote: > > I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But > > I can't configure the endpoint. > > > > pjsip: > > > > [obi202-auth](!) > > type = auth > > auth_type = userpass > > password = <mypass> > > >

Please can i ask you i want to know which code can help me to provide the taxation of voip/toip services in asterisk Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 01:36, Patrick Wakano <pwakano at gmail.com> a écrit : > Thanks everyone for the answers! > I did explored some options at the PHP level and probably will do > something in this direction, but in fact what I was really looking was >

@Olivior I agree that seting up WebRTC is hard, however when done it is smooth to use. For replication you can build RPMs with working configurations. Regarding stability, it is not being used widly, so can't say it is mature. However we have no complain so far regarding audio or connectivity. sometime we provide support for "allow media / mic" type issues, but you know it is

On 9/12/18 1:22 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 2:19 PM, sean darcy wrote: >> I understand that HangUp() hangs up the calling channel. I want to >> hangup the called channel. >> >> SIP/mycall-xxxxx calls and bridges with DAHDI/1-1. >> >> I send SIP/.... to listen to a long, very long, file. > > Define "send". How are you

I can't reach digium.com or asterisk.org. Did I miss the memo? sean

We tried to use the CURL fn to POST json, but it's sent as form data and there seems no support for changing the Content-Type header. We switched to invoking curl in the shell. All the documentation I could find says there is just one parameter for the url and an optional second for POST body. Is there an undocumented way to set Content-Type? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Some calls I get from google voice, I just send myself an email about the call and want to hangup. But I can't seem to make gv know I've hung up. extensions.conf: same => n,GoToIf($["${CALLERID(num)}"="office"]?email) ................. same => n(email),System(/usr/local/bin/emailme........) same => n,Answer() ; also tried without this same =>

Hi Olivior, We have recently worked on a WebRTC based agent panel. As based on my experience I think that WebRTC based phones are far better and cheaper then those soft / sip phone. the big plus is that they are easy to customize and developer can use the power of browser and web to build / offer features which are not possible with regular phones. Regarding your concern about BLF or call

Using Digium fax I've tried a simple dialplan: '8447' => 1. Answer() [pbx_config] 2. Set(CALLERID(num)=xxxyyyzzzz) [pbx_config] 3. Dial(DAHDI/g0/1bbbcccdddd,,G(send)) [pbx_config] [send] 4. SendFax(/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090922_1301.tif) [pbx_config] 5. HangUp() But I doesn't work. It executes

I understand that HangUp() hangs up the calling channel. I want to hangup the called channel. SIP/mycall-xxxxx calls and bridges with DAHDI/1-1. I send SIP/.... to listen to a long, very long, file. GoSub(play-long-file,s,1) [play-long-file] exten=s,1, ;;; Here I want to hangup DAHDI/1-1, the called channel same=n,Playback(very-long-file) same=n,Hangup() How do I hangup the called channel,