similar to: Withholding Answer Supervision

Heya Rodrigo Not sure, but this expansion on Sammy's concept may help you achieve the delayed ring on the secondary extensions you were looking for. exten => _600.,1,Dial(PJSIP/${EXTEN}) exten => _600.,n,Hangup exten => _600.wait5,1,Wait(5) exten => _600.wait5,n,Dial(PJSIP/${EXTEN:0:4}) exten => _600.wait5,n,Hangup exten => 555,1,Dial(LOCAL/6001&LOCAL/6002.wait5)

I am looking to setup paging using the auto answer feature on the Grandstream GXP2000. I am thinking I will follow the method as described here: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+page I will setup the 4th account on the phone to auto answer. Does anyone else have a method that works better? I also looked at the allpage AGI written on Voip-Info. But it seems

Hi. I my dialplan I have : same = n,Dial(PJSIP/6001,10) same = n,Dial(PJSIP/6002,30) same = n,Hangup() The extension 6002 will not be invited until the called party 6001 hangs up or until 10 seconds if nobody answers the call in 6001. How to call 6001 and immediately call 6002, having 2 phones ringing at same time, but without doing something like this : same =

Hi SamyGo. Thank you for the replay. So, let me explain it better: I knew that I could use something like " same = n,Dial(PJSIP/6001&PJSIP/6002) ". While every extension (called phones) rings and before anyone answers, SIP 183 messages will be sent to Asterisk from callees. If a called phone answer, the others will be hanged up. It is ok for me. I want to connect the caller just

Hi Sammy. After answering your last message (please, see my last message), I was thinking about conferences and my main objective. Conferences will not work well for my case, because I it will allows more than one called party answering the call. But, after one answers the call, I need cancel the others ringing callees. In this case, maybe the best thing to do is to let the called party sends

If I have the following in the dialplan exten => foo,n,Dial(SIP/1234&Zap/G1c/55443322) and SIP/5432 calls this extension, is it possible to show different callerid numbers to each of the target numbers ? The reason I ask is that if the call is from an internal sip phone, I want to show the internal callerid (5432) to the SIP phone on 1234, and the DDI of the 5432 extension

Probably I've overlooked something. But a quick search in `hg log -k doveadm` didn't show appropriate information. doveadm mailbox list -u user at example.com doesn't show child mailboxes. mailbox = N/A || \*: Sent Trash INBOX Drafts Junk-E-Mail Supplier mailbox = Supplier*: Supplier mailbox = Supplier/*: Supplier/Dell Supplier/VMware Supplier/? The same problem exists in

Ok, at the bottom of my h323.conf file on my 1st server I have this: ; --------------------- [test] type=user host=209.237.227.185 context=termination-test incominglimit=10 accountcode=005 ; --------------------- Using an Asterisk at the other IP, I have this: exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Dial(H323/${EXTEN}@64.135.11.85,,o) This should send a call from the test-server to the IP of the 1st server;

Heres a weird one... Call comes in on mISDN channel. Little bit of dialcode (in a macro) looks up the number in the astdb and puts an name to it. No real magic there, and it works well. Same macro also has parameter passed in to put a prefix on the name - this is set in the DDI handling and is dependent on the number called and allows phone users to see which number was called (company

On a BT line, how do I determine whether the number on an incoming call has been deliberately withheld (by dialling 141) or is merely unavailable (e.g. because it originated from overseas or passed through some ancient switching equipment) ? In the first case, I want the caller to be played a message to the effect that we are not at home to anonymous cowards but if their business is

Hi all, I''m working on a patch for shorewall to make it run with a Crossbeam X40 machine (www.crossbeamsystems.com) and I would like to know where to send it, is this list the correct location?. The patch is necesary because of Crossbeam X series running mode: when you make a shorewall start, restart or clear, there are a packet dropping until shorewall is Started or cleaned. At

Hi Guys, this is actually a thread of emails, but for some reason, even though i am a member, it's withholding my email so i said i would try it this route instead!... I appreciate the reading Thank you. If i have: matrix: > var1 var2 var3 > cell1 x x x > cell2 x x x > cell3 x x x > > cell4 > > . > .

Hello all, I have searched and have not yet identified a solution so now I am sending this message. In short, I need to split my data into training, validation, and testing subsets that keep all observations from the same sites together ? preferably as part of a cross validation procedure. Now for the longer version. And I must confess that although my R skills are improving, they are not so

From: Richard Humphrey <rlhumphrey at gmail.com> > Thanks that did the trick Although nVidia does put people on the Freedomware "nv" driver, and it can handle multiple framebuffers for Xinerama, VIVO (video in, video out), etc..., the Standardware "nvidia" driver is far easier to deal with for single framebuffer (no Xinerama) multiple displays, VIVO, etc..., in

On Sun, January 24, 2016 11:45, Peter Duffy wrote: > > Trouble is that when you go from 6 to 7, you also have the delights of > systemd and grub 2 to contend with. > . . . > Similarly with others who have commented, I simply cannot > understand why the maintainers of crucial components in > linux have this thing about making vast changes which impact > (usually adversely)

Demikhovsky, Elena wrote: > > Even then, I'd personally want to see further evidence of why the > correct solution is to model the floating point IV in SCEV rather than > find a more powerful way of converting the IV to an integer that models > > the non-integer values taken on by the IV. As an example, if the use > case is the following code with appropriate flags to

Greetings, I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available for the pre-release. I also try scanning the web site and mail list but was unable to find an answer. I was getting this or similar error with 2.3. I am just trying to build with the core library. I tried this in a xp and vista VM with the

I am unable to build llvm-2.7 or llvm-2.8 svn with the gcc-4.3.2 that comes with OpenSolaris. $ uname -a SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris $ gcc-4.3.2 --version gcc-4.3.2 (GCC) 4.3.2 Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR

Resend On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote: > Greetings, > > I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I > usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available > for the pre-release. I also try scanning the web site and mail list > but was unable to find an answer. I was getting this or similar > error with 2.3. I am

To anyone following the Windows toolchain saga: The gcc 4.9.2 toolchain that is currently in Rtools33 has too many incompatibilities with existing code, so we won't be using it in the R 3.2.0 build. I will soon be uploading to CRAN a new version of Rtools33 that is very similar to Rtools32, containing gcc 4.6.3. We are continuing to work on the new toolchain, and hope to have it ready