Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "PJSIP Multipart Body"
2016 Feb 18
2
Asterisk 13 and WebRTC. Is wiki page still valid ?
2016-02-18 14:57 GMT+01:00 Simon Hohberg <simon.hohberg at mcs-datalabs.com>:
>
> Is it implied here that both HTTPS and WSS must also come from the same
>> server (Same Origin Policy) ?
>>
> No, the same origin policy does not apply to web sockets.
>
> Then, can I also install my own WebRTC demo page on my own private
>> Asterisk server and access this demo
2016 Feb 18
2
Asterisk 13 and WebRTC. Is wiki page still valid ?
2016-02-18 15:42 GMT+01:00 Marek ?ervenka <cervajs at fpf.slu.cz>:
> my experience with pjsip for webrtc
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2015-September/287562.html
>
>
> Yes I saw this post earlier today.
Having to fight 14 days scared me a bit !
Did you set sipml5 on your own server or did you use Live demo (
2015 Aug 06
2
asterisk queue - skills based routing (patch updated)
hi,
there is updated skills based routing patch for asterisk queue
please test if you have time
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17366?jql=text%20~%20%22skills%22
--
---------------------------------------
Marek Cervenka
=======================================
2015 Aug 10
2
asterisk queue - skills based routing (patch updated)
Dne 6.8.2015 v 21:00 Sylvain Boily napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> Le 2015-08-06 09:24, Marek Cervenka a ?crit :
>> hi,
>>
>> there is updated skills based routing patch for asterisk queue
>> please test if you have time
>>
>> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17366?jql=text%20~%20%22skills%22
>>
>>
>
> You can find the latest
2016 Feb 18
2
Asterisk 13 and WebRTC. Is wiki page still valid ?
Hello,
I'm trying to have my first calls with WebRTC.
My server has asterisk 13.7.0.
I'm following the instructions from the wiki [1].
So I'm using [2] live demo from a Chrome navigator (v48) on Debian Jessie
station.
Whenever I type something like ws://123.123.123.123:8088/ws in Expert Mode
form (see [1]), I'm getting this error :
*2:SecurityError: Failed to construct
2016 Feb 18
2
Asterisk 13 and WebRTC. Is wiki page still valid ?
Thank you much for yor reply.
2016-02-18 13:30 GMT+01:00 Simon Hohberg <simon.hohberg at mcs-datalabs.com>:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On 02/18/2016 12:10 PM, Olivier wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to have my first calls with WebRTC.
> My server has asterisk 13.7.0.
>
> I'm following the instructions from the wiki [1].
> So I'm using [2] live demo from
2017 Jan 03
3
Does HEP require PJSIP or does it also works with SIP ?
Hello,
On a newly built Asterisk 13.13.1 system, I can't make HEP work with
chan_sip (though I could make it work with PJSIP on another instance).
Looking either at [1] or hep.conf, I can't see anything meaning HEP
requires PJSIP.
Before diging deeper, may I simply ask if HEP requires PJSIP or not ?
What about a line mentioning the answer in above documents (to keep other
from wondering
2017 May 30
3
Asterisk 14.3.1 > 14.4.1 upgrade pjsip nat broken?
Hi first post, so hope I'm not violating protocol.
Been using Asterisk as home phone and hobby use for nearly 10 years. I
love this project.
Anyway, would someone mind verifying my pjsip.conf ? This seems to work
well for 14.3.1 but I get no rtp into my natted Linphone when I upgrade
to 14.4.1. Other than that the phone registers properly on 14.4.1.
I can provide a pjsip log as well,
2016 Jun 06
4
PJSIP subscribe
Hello,
I'm trying to use presence with PJSIP and I have a "issue".
I created correctly hint priorities like:
exten => 1000,hint,PJSIP/1000
exten => 1001,hint,PJSIP/1001
Extension 1000 can subscribe extension 1001 y vice-versa. The problem is
when the extension 1000 make or receive a call. In the softphone where
the extension is present on buddy list, the extension appear
2016 Jan 13
2
"pjsip show endpoints" returns "No Objects Found" in 13.7.0-rc2
Hi everyone,
I have just upgraded to Asterisk 13.7.0-rc2 and noticed that when I type "pjsip show endpoints" at the CLI, I get "No Objects Found".
However, if I request information on a specific endpoint, (for example: "pjsip show endpoint 101") then I get all of the information for that endpoint as expected.
This seems to have started as soon as I upgraded to
2014 Aug 14
1
Possible handle leak in PJSIP
I have been seeing errors saying the Asterisk cannot establish an RTP
connection, so I did this:
lsof -i -n -P | grep asterisk | wc -l
10483
but I have only
Asterisk 11 has 1 open calls
Asterisk 12 has 21 open calls
Asterisk 14 has 19 open calls
Asterisk 15 has 22 open calls
Asterisk 16 has 15 open calls
Asterisk 17 has 15 open calls
Asterisk 30 has 71 open calls
Total
164 active calls
The
2015 Oct 18
3
pjsip show xxxx like endpoint?
Did you open a Jira issue for this yet? I can actually work on this this
week.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 9:44 AM, George Joseph <george.joseph at fairview5.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Bryant Zimmerman <BryantZ at zktech.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to limit the items returned by pjsip show [type] using like
>>
>
> There isn't but
2015 Mar 26
1
Dial to PJSIP Channel with Typo "PJSIP//" Causes Asterisk Shutdown
I found an issue with how PJSIP handles a typo in the Dial application. If
the Channel is mistakenly typed with two slashes (i.e Dial(PJSIP//xxxx...),
the Dial applications fails (obviously), but it also kills the server.
I put some code in my pbx_config to check for that string and not let the
dialplan reload, but it seems like there should be a better way to handle
in in the PJSIP stack or Dial
2015 Oct 16
2
pjsip show xxxx like endpoint?
Is there a way to limit the items returned by pjsip show [type] using like
chan_sip allowed for sip show peers like xxxx, but I can't seem to figure
out how to lookup or limit my returns with pjsip
Thanks
Bryant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2015 Mar 11
2
PJSIP some AMI events is absent?
Hello.
Asterisk 13.2, PJSIP.
Problem: I do not get any AMI events when changing the status of the
contact.
When using chan_sip I got "peerstatus" event.
When using res_pjsip and devices (endpoint configuration) I got
"peerstatus" event.
When using res_pjsip.so and OUTBOUND REGISTRATION WITH OUTBOUND
AUTHENTICATION i got "registry" event.
When using
2014 Oct 26
1
DTMF behavior in asterisk 12 with PJSIP
Hello all,
We have recently upgraded some of our services to Asterisk 12 with PJSIP.
We have 2 issues related to DTMF:
1. in the regular SIP channel we had DTMF auto mode, which adapted the DTMF
settings according to the incoming INVITE - RFC2833 or inband. The is no
such settings in PJSIP. Do you know is there is a plan to develop it?
2. When we setup 2 peers, one RFC4733 and the other inband,
2020 Jan 23
1
PJSIP do not challenge 'options' without username. - silence 'notice' on console.
Hi Gang
Mitel PBX use 'options' without username to monitor the connection.
Therefore Asterisk PJSIP cannot match an unsername against an endpoint
and prints a notice on the console.
Is there a way to silence this kind of notice?
I wonder if identify_by 'header' could solve the issue to match method
'options', but I was not able to find any documentation about this.
2016 Jan 29
2
PJSIP Stun/ICE
>>>>> "AS" == A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk> writes:
AS> If you are paying for a business-grade Internet connection, you
AS> should get a static IP address -- or a block of them -- as
AS> standard. Maybe you need to change your ISP?
In some places (including here) static ip is not affordable.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos at
2016 Feb 29
2
Asterisk 13 and WebRTC. Is wiki page still valid ?
2016-02-19 12:01 GMT+01:00 Marek ?ervenka <cervajs at fpf.slu.cz>:
> on my own server
>
Today, I'm back from holidays trip.
First of all, thanks for replying !
I'll try to use jssip as you suggested.
Anyway, I'm still failing to understand if wiki's page [1] is still valid
with Asterisk 13, and if it's not valid anymore, which is the main change
that prevent
2017 Jun 05
3
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
>> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote:
>>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two ends
>>> points on public networks and visible to one another? If not the reinvite
>>> may be passing an internal (nat'ed)