similar to: Dialplan question: Variables in GoTo() ?

I've having a bit of a problem generating output that doesn't result in the "Instruction does not dominate all uses!". In my code it relates to exception handling and how I generate the blocks. I understand exactly why I get the message, but I'm unsure of how I can structure things to avoid the problem. In a rough pseudo-code, my blocks look like this: entry: store 0,

Hiall, I want to give the action of a form an additional parameters but can''t figure out how to do it. My code looks like this <%= start_form_tag :action => ''create'', next_step => true %> <%= render :partial => ''user_form'' %> <%= render :partial => ''community_form'' %> <%= submit_tag

On 4 November 2013 02:31, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > But the incoming value from the landing pad will always be null, won't it? > If so, just iterate through the predecessors and add the terminator as the > incoming value if it's an invoke instruction and add the null value it's > not. > Won't that work? > Note that the

I may or may not be experiencing the behavior described in: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14241 I'm using asterisk-1.6.0.6, Bridge(), and I'm having a hangup context executed when the caller is still on the line. These channels are all SIP. ==== I want a group of expert callers who can dial in to the system, stay put, and let other learner callers come to them. In between the

I've just upgraded to 1.6.2.6 on one of my test systems. I started out happy, with some improvements in transfers to Local() channels from a SIP channel, and much nicer verbose fax handling. However, something is really weird when I need to do System() calls. It was really, really weird. This was also affecting AGI, when I needed to read system variables from asterisk into an AGI Perl script.

Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: entry: result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 landing0: landingpad result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1 landing1: landingpad br defer_block defer_block: result = phi [ result0, entry ], [ result1, landing0 ], [ null, landing1 ] ... This doesn't have landing pads with multiple

Hi, I'm sure this topic has been discussed before but i'm having trouble finding a simple answer. Whats the easiest way of sending an email from Asterisk? I want to set up a warning so that after a Dial cmd, if the DIALSTATUS is CHANUNAVAIL, Asterisk sends an email to the admin to check the voip phone is connected properly. I've got the dial plan set up, I just dont know what

But the incoming value from the landing pad will always be null, won't it? If so, just iterate through the predecessors and add the terminator as the incoming value if it's an invoke instruction and add the null value it's not. Won't that work? On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:22 AM, edA-qa mort-ora-y <eda-qa at disemia.com>wrote: > On 03/11/13 12:16, Henrique Santos wrote:

I am calling from a polycom phone into asterisk ( 1105 ) on a PC with a speaker attached. When asterisk first starts this works. In fact it works for some time. Then it just stops with this error on the CLI. [Apr 4 15:10:21] NOTICE[4357]: chan_sip.c:21358 handle_request_invite: Call from 'mndemo_to_mediaport105' to extension '1105' rejected because extension not found in

On 03/11/13 12:16, Henrique Santos wrote: > You could try placing a phi node at "defer_block" with incoming value > "result" > when the incoming block is "entry", and do the same for "null" and > "landing". > Then, instead of loading "result", you load the value given by the newly > created phi. That seems like the

This reminds me of Kenneth's "context" proposal from some time back: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-April/030787.html I haven't compared the two too closely, but I thought I should throw it out there as food for thought. Reid On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Justin Holewinski >

I have an application that needs to vary the menu choices available based upon the availability of an external resource at a given time. What I have in mind is a system that can uplink a user to one of many different satellites. Due to the nature of orbital mechanics a satellite may be out of range at any given time. I only want to present a menu of available satellites. I can query an

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Sanjoy Das < > sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for the feedback. For context, my implementation plan is here: >> http://pastebin.com/e9JMZNCE >> >> First, about unwinding: >>

with the slip of a finger, i destroyed by extensions.conf (grep -i > extensions.conf) I have a backup that is dozens of hours of code old. is there a way i can use the asterisk cli (or some other asterisky method) to recreate that extensions.conf ?

On 4/13/16 11:57 AM, A J Stiles wrote: > You could try > *CLI> dialplan show Between my older backup and dialplan show, I guess that's my best shot. Thanks :D

Filesystem UUID shows the partition we boot kernel from. The kernel parameter has format like FSUUID=DA1A-0B2E. The SYSAPPEND bit is 0x40000. Now the FAT only supports FSUUID. The patch is based on 67aaaeeb228. Signed-off-by: Serj Kalichev <serj.kalichev at gmail.com> --- com32/include/syslinux/sysappend.h | 1 + core/fs/btrfs/btrfs.c | 3 ++- core/fs/ext2/ext2.c

FYI there is now serious talk of the Linux kernel dropping support for compilers that *don't* support asm goto. On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 13:13 -0700, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:44 AM, John McCall via llvm-dev > > ts.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> > >

On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:26 +0000, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:07 AM Yatsina, Marina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Asm goto feature was introduces to GCC in order to optimize the > > support for tracepoints in Linux kernel (it can be used for other > > things that do nop patching). > >   > > GCC

Linux kernel is using the “asm goto” feature, other projects probably use it as well. I think it provides motivation to support it in LLVM. Regarding the complexity, I believe there is some infrastructure that we can at least partially reuse (the support for “indirectbr” instruction). My focus is adding “asm goto” support, the other things are indeed completely orthogonal and came up in bugs

Hi All, as good? I am trying to make a call for the Unicall channels and after the exchange of signalling and sending of the digits asterisk locks up with the sending of the signalling "E" and the TELCO says that asterisk would have to send signalling "F", as to make for asterisk to send signalling "F"? The TELCO says that the signalling "E" is