similar to: How to set the global setting for each pjsip endpoint

how if I use the auto generate once from freepbx ? On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Ishfaq Malik <ish at pack-net.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 22 September 2015 at 16:04, Thyda ENG <engthyda at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have many endpoints and each endpoint has some parameter in common so i >> wonder is there any way to config one for all endpoints? Like in my

So, the only thing that is needed in the endpoint definition in pjsip.conf (there is no such file pjsip.endpoint_custom.conf) is *message_context=astsms* Is that correct? Anything I need to do in extensions.conf? I see that the messages are received at Asterisk (when I turn on pjsip set logger on) but they are not delivered to the other endpoint. What gives? Any help appreciated. Thanks! On

Hello, I am looking for documentation support for enabling instant messaging between endpoints using Asterisk 13.1.0 and vanilla VoIP clients such as Zoiper. Where do I enable this support on the server side and does it need anything on the client side? I see plenty of online help for chan_sip, but nothing for chan_pjsip. I imagine there is both pjsip.conf configuration and extensions.conf

Thanks again. How do you create that message context in extensions.conf? On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Thyda ENG <engthyda at gmail.com> wrote: > According to what I have done , I add the message_context to the > pjsip.endpoint_custom.conf in /etc/asterisk and then I create that > message_context in the extension.conf, and it works. > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:34 AM,

Asterisk 13.8 Is CALLERID(all) supposed to wok for pjsip? When I do this: exten => 1234,Set(CALLERID(all)="Jon Doe" <+123456789>) same => n,Dial(PJSIP/phone123, 30) I expect the callerid to be as set, but is always seems to be "phone123", the name of the endpoint. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: >>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two ends >>> points on public networks and visible to one another? If not the reinvite >>> may be passing an internal (nat'ed)

On 1 July 2016 at 17:41, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > > >> exten => 1234,Set(CALLERID(all)="Jon Doe" <+123456789>) >> same => n,Dial(PJSIP/phone123, 30) >> > > Your exten line has no priority, is that how it is in your dialplan? > Actually no, I stole that line from an earlier email to this list. Mine has a priority.

hi, i'm fighting with webrtc for 14 days reporting my experience to minimize number of crazy asterisk users i have working webrtc with simpl5 + asterisk 13 + pjproject 2.4.5 + chan_pjsip + secure websockets + secure audio + audio in both ways problems first, i needed run chan_sip for old hard phones and wss with chan_pjsip only for webrtc. this is possible with patch from

I've seen this happen three times in the wild now.  I've been trying to isolate the source of the issue, but so far it seems like there's not enough debug output to know why this occurs. Long story short: - Start Asterisk - PJSIP Handles receiving INVITE from ITSP via WAN (Asterisk is behind NAT).  SIP is handled correctly, Asterisk responds OK with RTP media address of

Hi, I'm using Asterisk to bridge the incoming call to another destination using the Dial command. However, when an anonymous call comes in then privacy information is not passed into the B Leg. For instance, the Privacy header and P-Asserted-Identity aren't copied to the B Leg. Is there an option to give to the Dial command, or another variable to set, to make Asterisk copy such

Hello all, I'm setting up a couple of test boxes and I'm running into a problem. What I need help with is determining whether I'm going something wrong or if I need to post a bug report. I have two asterisk 13.0-beta 3 machines set up with extensions connected to each as such: 3700 ----> AST-A <------> AST-B <---- 3800 & 3801 When I place a call from 3800 to

I'm being told by my ITSP that my Asterisk shouldn't be challenging their system to authenticate (i.e. a 401 response) when they send me a SIP MESSAGE (or I suppose a SIP INVITE for that matter). But I'm not sure what a pjsip.conf configuration for that looks like. How does one associate an incoming call/message with an existing authenticated outgoing registration so that Asterisk

Ok Dan, try this... I was able to get this to work behind a NAT and with ip address authentication. [global] type = global debug = yes [transport1] type = transport bind = 0.0.0.0 protocol = udp *local_net=<yourlocalnet I.E. 10.10.10.10/24 <http://10.10.10.10/24>>external_media_address=<your public ip address>external_signaling_address=<your public address>*

I am using the asterisk 13 and I config my dialplan for the SIP messaging as the following : http://highsecurity.blogspot.com/2012/03/asterisk-10-110-sms-messaging-or-sip.html [astsms] exten => _.,1,NoOp(SMS receiving dialplan invoked) exten => _.,n,NoOp(To ${MESSAGE(to)}) exten => _.,n,NoOp(From ${MESSAGE(from)}) exten => _.,n,NoOp(Body ${MESSAGE(body)}) exten =>

Here's an update... My network admin would not turn off the ALG because it would cause several other problems to other phone systems we have. He looked at the sip trace. What he found is the PJSIP trace showed a different IP address than the older chan_sip so he had me change the aor contact to outbound.vitelity.net At this point, it seems to be working (and this is going through a Cisco

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > Yes, everything is behind the same NAT. > > > > For the application I?m working on, the only endpoint is the endpoint to > Vitelity. > > We use AMI to Originate calls from Asterisk endpoint through Vitelity to > phones. > > After that, we control the call through AMI to perform the

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > Today, I tried the same behavior on Asterisk 13.1.0 and Asterisk 12.2.0. > > > > Same problem is happening with both of them. > > > > Could this be caused by PJPROJECT 2.3? > > > > Anyone have any suggestions for what I can try? > > > > My boss is giving me until

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > Hi George, > > > > Thank you for looking into this. > > This is behind a nat? > > > Just to be clear...both the pbx and local endpoints are behind the same NAT? > [global] > > type = global > > debug = yes > > > > [transport1] > > type = transport

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > I am not sure if I entered the correct settings for the transport > information. > > For the local_net, I entered my local ip address, but no mask. I will > check with the network admin so he can verify the settings I entered. > > > You need the network and mask. For example if the ip

Not sure why, but Vitelity changed the settings to IP based authentication on me. Here's the new sip.conf settings they sent me. type=friend dtmfmode=auto host=64.2.142.93 allow=all nat=yes canreinvite=no trustrpid=yes sendrpid=yes When I use these settings to originate calls using the sip.conf they sent me, everything works. Action: Originate ActionID: S8 Channel: