similar to: chan_sip.c: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission

Hi, I noted on my 4.7 machines that when a ssh conection is made, the following PTR query happens (10.11.1.11 is the src address in the example): 13:23:21.120290 PUBLIC_IP.4523 > PUBLIC_IP.53: 52788+ PTR? 11.1.11.10.in-addr.arpa. (41) 13:23:21.120517 PUBLIC_IP.4524 > PUBLIC_IP.53: 52788+ PTR? 11.1.11.10.in-addr.arpa. (41) 13:23:21.120683 PUBLIC_IP.4525 > PUBLIC_IP.53: 52788+ PTR?

Hello All, my asterisk server is constantly under attack [Apr 4 06:56:00] NOTICE[21745]: chan_sip.c:25673 handle_request_register: Registration from '"4941" <sip:4941 at public_ip>' failed for '194.100.46.132 194.100.46.132:56714' - Wrong password [Apr 4 06:56:00] NOTICE[21745]: chan_sip.c:25673 handle_request_register: Registration from '"4941"

I''d like to convert some simple, general ruby scripts I have into rails apps just for testing purposes. Many of these apps are not DB driven, so the whole CRUD concept does not apply to them... here''s a sample: require ''socket'' server = TCPServer.new(''12345'') while (session = server.accept) Thread.new(session) do |this_session|

I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned

Andrew, Just passing the public IP of our samba to samba_dnsupdate is enough to replicate the data correctly? samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --current-ip=PUBLIC_IP On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 6:39 AM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 14:59 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Has anyone already installed

Hi. I'm new to asterisk and, one way or the other, I manage to get it working for me. But I'm having a hard time getting calls going to and coming from the same provider, since the definition of the peer in sip.conf seems to be different AND not compatible for incoming and outgoing call. Outgoing calls need a "secret" and "username" definition in the peer context of

Hello, what does this message mean ? [Oct 12 14:03:32] DEBUG[9064] chan_sip.c: Trying to put 'SIP/2.0 401' onto UDP socket destined for public_ip:2049 I find this in my debug log file when "core set debug 25". Is something failing, or is this just informative ? Kind regards, Jonas. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am setting up a box with a T100P. Everything is going well. The company I am working with has their one phone switch gear. They provisioned me a E&M Wink T1. Cannot do PRI unfortunately. We chose E&M so we could pass an unlimited number of DIDs to the trunk as apposed to FXS loopstart signaling. I can make outbound calls no problem, but I am having problems with the dial plan for inbound

Am 12.03.2019 um 10:16 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:47:53 +0100 > Christian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 11.03.2019 um 09:24 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:16:30 +0100 >>> Christian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all,

Hello, I'm having difficulty with registering a SIP account in a Snom 320 IP-phone. This is what sip debug tells me : [Oct 7 13:28:42] VERBOSE[20314] chan_sip.c: [Oct 7 13:28:42] <--- SIP read from UDP:public_ip:58697 ---> REGISTER sip:sip.domain.tld SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.114.200:2048;branch=z9hG4bK-vj1xvbdnp4dw;rport From: <sip:test3 at

Issue is what subject says. Here is the background. Version: 11.11.0 Topology: Asterisk Box at our Data Center behind Cisco Firewall. Everything works fine from remote offices over a VPN. Issue is sales team would like to connect up to our Asterisk box remotely (offnet). Common enough solution, I'm guessing. So, I've opened all the correct holes on the firewall and hammered out

Hi All, i am stuck in NAT issue on ec2 cloud computing from last 2-3 days , may be some of you are doing setup and integration on cloud. below is my setup details which may help you to suggest me solution. Asterisk version : 1.6.2.6 1) Kamailio server having public_ip as well local ip .i am using mediaproxy [also tried rtpproxy] . 2) Asterisk server having public_ip as well local ip. setup:

Hi list, We, an OSS advocacy group, setup a Xen 3.1 machine composed of : . a 64 bits dom0 running Debian stable amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running OpenBSD amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running NetBSD i386 This machine is to be hosted and reachable from the Internet, but it will only have one public IP. Naturally, our first tought was to port-forward using iptables / netfilter. We didn''t really

Hi everyone, I'm trying to send a FAX with the following configuration: Analog FAX machine (OKI) <----->SPA21000<----->LAN<----->Asterisk<--------> PSTN I'm restricted to use passthru mode for faxing, instead of T.38 protocol, because the Asterisk box is running v1.2 and cannot be changed as it is in a heavy production environment. Anyway, it "should"

Hello, I have a problem with the following setup, I hope you can help me. I have two internet gateways, one for LAN1 and the second for LAN2. +--------------+ GW1 more eth0| |eth4(SNAT) GW2 ---...routers...-----+ router +----------------- | | +---+------+---+ eth1|

Hello, Has anyone already installed samba4 as DC at aws? If so, how have dealt with the question of the private ip and the public ip? I will launch an instance and join samba DC to our existing active directory to work as an external authenticator for the moodle we have in the cloud. -- Elias Pereira

Hi Guys Given these occassional errors on my Asterisk CLI: [Jul 2 10:23:36] WARNING[2060]: chan_sip.c:3641 retrans_pkt: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission 17bb3a993ad10f8818970ae952b81e73 at 192.168.11.31:5060 for seqno 102 (Critical Request) -- See https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/SIP+Retransmissions Packet timed out after 32000ms with no response [Jul 2 10:23:49]

I'm still confused, but in any case, there's nothing stopping "miou" from impersonating "apeliote"'s subnets in your case, unless you use StrictSubnets. Here's the easiest way to do the spoofing: In miou's own node file (on the miou machine itself), add apeliote's subnets with a Weight smaller than 10 (which is the default), so that it overrides them.

Hi, I''m serving the puppetmaster application with its config.ru through unicorn - proxied by nginx. I''m using unix sockets, 4 workers, and 2048 backlog. The clients - after their typical "puppet run" - send back a report to the master in YAML. Some clients whose reports tend to be large (close to 2mb) get a 502 bad gateway error and error out. nginx log: 2010/10/22

On 4 May 2015 at 20:53, Anne-Gwenn Kettunen <anwen at asphodelium.eu> wrote: > We started to take a look about that, and apparently, it seems that the IP > in the public key is taken into account when a client connects to a gateway. > Spoofing at that level doesn't seem easy, because the IP address seems to be > part of the authentication process. I'm having trouble