similar to: Almost solved: using my Asterisk from Internet

Hi list! I'm working hard to securing my Asterisk... Now I deleted all possibility to access the node as "anonymous" and every call through the proxy will be checked (just known peers are allowed to use it). Furthermore, I restricted the registration of my home phones to the Network I reserved for them and I changed the port on my Firewall, so that I don't use 5060 anymore. Now

Zitat von Steve Totaro <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com>: > Are you using the wifi on on the cellphone? The peer IP is showing as > 192.168.200.3 which is not a routable address. Unless things have changed, > double NAT configurations do not work. Hi Steve, My Asterisk is behind a NAT, but my cellphone was NOT in NAT, but direct in Internet. But maybe my Provider does a

Zitat von A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk>: > On Thursday 11 Jun 2015, Luca Bertoncello wrote: >> Now my problem is to check in my dialplan if the peer, that originate >> the call, is reachable, and if not, to give an error... >> >> Is there any function to know if the peer is reachable? > > The peer that *originated* the call *must* be

Hi list! So, new day, new problem... I tried right now to call from my cellphone a peer in my Asterisk. The cellphone has correct credentials, but it's NOT registered on my Asterisk, now. I just tried to call a peer in my network, from a peer not yet registered. And it works... :( The very curious thing is, that I can't find how the call will be accepted... Every section in my dialplan

Ashwin Surendran <Ashwin.Surendran at now-health.com> schrieb: > What settings have you got for directmedia? > > Could you try > > nat=force_rport,comedia > directmedia=no Tried. Peer always unreachable, call not possible... :( Other idea? Thanks Luca Bertoncello (lucabert at lucabert.de)

Hi again! I always try to get my mobile phone work with my Asterisk. I tried to install Asterisk on my PC (with public IP), but it has problems, too... I think, my UMTS-Provider doesn't want to connect to dynamic IP or my DSL-Provider does not want it, too, since I have no problem to connect and get a very good audio quality if I connect to other SIP-Provider or to an Asterisk (SAME

Zitat von A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk>: > On Monday 06 Jul 2015, Luca Bertoncello wrote: >> Well, but for voice quality, which codec is better? >> alaw or gsm? > > A-law is better for voice quality (sorry, thought my original > explanation was > obvious). But note that if the destination is a mobile phone, GSM will be > used anyway, at

Hi again! About my previous E-Mail... I though about it and I think, that maybe I'm just very stupid... Since I called an INTERNAL number, Asterisk tried to call it. I tried right now to call an EXTERNAL number (using my context [myproxy]) and the behavior is NOT the same... Not 100% correct, but it tries the right way... Now my problem is to check in my dialplan if the peer, that

Darryl Moore <darryl at moores.ca> schrieb: > Ahh. Seen that before! That suggests to me that you don't have your > sip.conf records setup right. > > What's your sip.conf look like? Well, here what I wrote in my sip.conf: register => 00493511111111:MYSECRET at pbxluca/00493511111111 register => 00493512222222:MYSECRET at pbxfax/00493512222222 register =>

Zitat von Guido Falsi <mad at madpilot.net>: > So, trying to bind authentication to originate calls to registrations is > conceptually wrong in the SIP world. Maybe you can do that but that's > not the way the protocols have been engineered to work. Hi Guido, thanks for your answer. Well, I decided to do that, since I have my Asterisk reachable from Internet just for my

Zitat von A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk>: Hi, > GSM is the native codec used for calls to mobile phones; it uses lossy > compression to achieve a low bit rate. > > A-law is the native codec used by physical exchanges on the land line network > (PSTN and ISDN). It is non-lossy. It works by arranging the "steps" closer > together near the zero

Zitat von A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk>: > Yes. You should definitely be using A-law for calls to the Outside World. Well, I wanted to change these settings, but I'm not sure, where I have to do that... I think in the users.conf, but I think, the "allow" keywords is for the network... How can I change this setting? Thanks Luca Bertoncello (lucabert

Hi list! Very strange... I ran the Asterisk CLI for other tasks, and suddenly I got this message: == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [000972592603325 at default:1] Verbose("SIP/192.168.20.120-0000002a", "2,PROXY Call from 0123456 to 000972592603325") in new stack == PROXY Call from 0123456 to 000972592603325 -- Executing [000972592603325 at default:2]

Hi list! I noticed that when the phone of my wife calls the gsm codec will be used, but if someone calls the phone, alaw will be used: 00493511111111 calls 00493512222222: OpenWrt*CLI> sip show channels Peer User/ANR Call ID Format Hold Last Message Expiry Peer 192.168.200.11 00493512222222 5305ad0e07977dd 0x4 (ulaw) No

2015-06-08 22:35 GMT+02:00 D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy at vex.net>: > On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:24:33 +0200 > Luca Bertoncello <lucabert at lucabert.de> wrote: > > Kevin Larsen <kevin.larsen at pioneerballoon.com> schrieb: > > > Basically, they are hoping that you are running the equivalent of a > > > mail server open relay. They are trying to use you

> Now I have the problem for my cellphone... I need to register from almost any > IP (at least in Europe), so I can't restrict it. > Well, the password is NOT simple and random. > > Now, I tried to register the user of my cellphone using a PC, as my cellphone > was already registered. > And Asterisk accepted this registration... :( Were you trying to register the PC

Am 23.06.2020 16:22, schrieb Marek Greško: > It seems your problems lie in something other. Most probably it is not > mtu problem. All my suspections are contradicted. If it is true you > have inter vlan voice quality problems, it is definitely something > different. Formerly I assumed you were trying only LTE vs LAN using > internet. I'm not sure what you mean with the last

Kevin Larsen <kevin.larsen at pioneerballoon.com> schrieb: > The phone you gave your wife is really old. Are you sure it supports SIP > OPTIONS? Can you make a call in or out to it? If you can, it is more > likely that it just doesn't support that and you can't use a qualify > statement. No, I'm not sure. And no, I can't make any call, right now... At least,

Kevin Larsen <kevin.larsen at pioneerballoon.com> schrieb: > Based on SIP packets coming in from IP addresses you don't recognize, > while you may not be hacked, you would seem to have people probing your I think, too, it's someone probing my IP... > system. One thing you can do at the firewall level is restrict inbound sip > communications to only those from your

On Monday 08 Jun 2015, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Hi again, list! > > I know, I'm really annoying the list... :) Everyone has to start somewhere; and at least you aren't asking hundreds of questions in one go, including some which come under the heading of "Don't even think about trying to set this up until you have got X working", then ignoring every answer you