similar to: did i miss the memo on asterisk devel ?

sean darcy wrote: > I usually lurk on the asterisk devel list to see what's going on. > > No posts for a week or two. Has the list moved ? Nope - it's just been a quiet time. -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

I see a lot of tag lines on posts for the Asterisk Community Forum. Is that forum supposed to supersede this mailing list ? sean

I can't reach digium.com or asterisk.org. Did I miss the memo? sean

As you know, the ability to use a bundled version of pjproject was introduced with Asterisk 13.8.0. More info on the Asterisk Wiki <https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Building+and+Installing+pjproject#BuildingandInstallingpjproject-bundled> and in this email thread <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2016-March/288685.html>. Since then I've fixed a few

asterisk-16.13.0-rc2. Fedora 32 pjsip won't load because of undefined symbols: [Sep 4 14:19:25] ERROR[141137]: loader.c:2396 load_modules: Error loading module 'func_pjsip_aor.so': /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/func_pjsip_aor.so: undefined symbol: ast_sip_location_retrieve_aor_contacts [Sep 4 14:19:25] ERROR[141137]: loader.c:2396 load_modules: Error loading module

Is the list going to be the same after sangoma take over digium? On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 12:05 PM, sean darcy wrote: > > I see a lot of tag lines on posts for the Asterisk Community Forum. Is > > that forum supposed to supersede this mailing list ? > > Both remain available but the community

I'm getting invites to very high ports every 30 seconds from a particular ip address: Retransmitting #10 (NAT) to 5.199.133.128:52734: SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 0.0.0.0:52734;branch=z9hG4bK1207255353;received=5.199.133.128;rport=52734 From: <sip:37120116780191250 at 67.80.191.250>;tag=1872048972 To: <sip:3712011972592181418 at 67.80.191.250>;tag=as3a52e748

Hi, In the past when I wanted to back port a patch I would go on to the issue tracker and find a link to the patches that were uploaded ( I think through gerrit?). I am trying to see what changes were done for https://issues-archive.asterisk.org/ASTERISK-26109. It seems the code changes were introduced in 14.4.0-rc1. Is there any "n00b" way of seeing what patches were created for this

My last problem was nicely solved through this mailing list so hopefully this new problem will have the same happy outcome. My situation is that I have many extensions. Here is a sample: [client-phone](!) type=friend host=dynamic secret=XXXXXXXXXX dtmfmode=auto disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=gsm allow=g723 allow=ilbc subscribemwi=no [4165555555](client-phone) secret=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 16:30:39 +0800 Michael Dupree <michael at easybitllc.com> wrote: > Not 100% ure, but maybe play with the canreinvite or directmedia > settings. Yes! That was it. Just for future searches here is what I did. I added "directmedia = no" in sip.conf. This fixed the issue. I believe that Asterisk was getting confused when one leg was inside NAT and the

Well, that sounds pretty straight forward. I can do this and push it to gerrit. Do I need to create a ticket for this? With best regards Florian Floimair Innovation - Software-Development COMMEND INTERNATIONAL GMBH A-5020 Salzburg, Saalachstraße 51 http://www.commend.com <http://www.commend.com/> Security and Communication by Commend FN 178618z | LG Salzburg Am 22.08.19, 11:55

My understanding based on Wireshark analysis is that the signaling works (also the recipent phone is displaying the video frame before accepting the call), also the calling phone send video (i see that also via Wireshark) but the recipent phone doesn't get any video from the Asterisk before the call. 2018-04-09 17:02 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>: > On Mon, Apr 9,

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 10:04 AM, sean darcy wrote: > On 4/5/19 10:36 AM, sean darcy wrote: > > I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But > > I can't configure the endpoint. > > > > pjsip: > > > > [obi202-auth](!) > > type = auth > > auth_type = userpass > > password = <mypass> > > >

All, I'm using asterisk 16.4.0 with h264 and opus quite well using linphone 4.1 client on android and baresip on linux. I'm exploring use of h265 for improved video quality/lower network bandwidth. I do not see pass through support on asterisk for h265/hvec. All my SIP clients and underlying hardware have hvec/h265 encoding and decoding available. I would have liked vp9 however, vp9

Have you enabled DTMF logging and seen the DTMF codes being recognised by Asterisk? I had a bunch of soft phones that I had to change to using ?sip info? for the DTMF signalling as the RFC signalling was not always being recognised. This would cause transfers to appear as if the user had not dialled any digits. On 20/12/2014 20:52, "sean darcy" <seandarcy2 at gmail.com> wrote:

We have a 10.10.0.0 internal network. The asterisk server - 10.10.10.180 - has a PRI connection to a T-1. Another server is the router to the internet. All phones in the office and the workstations are on the network. Most of the internal phones are aastra 9133i's. Here the network config from a phone: Network Settings Basic Network Settings DHCP [ ]

Some calls I get from google voice, I just send myself an email about the call and want to hangup. But I can't seem to make gv know I've hung up. extensions.conf: same => n,GoToIf($["${CALLERID(num)}"="office"]?email) ................. same => n(email),System(/usr/local/bin/emailme........) same => n,Answer() ; also tried without this same =>

On 08/29/2018 09:42 AM, Carlos Rojas wrote: > Hi > > Probably somebody is trying to hack your system, you should block that > ip on your firewall. > > Regards > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:34 AM, sean darcy <seandarcy2 at gmail.com > <mailto:seandarcy2 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I'm getting invites to very high ports every 30 seconds from a

On 08/29/2018 11:59 AM, Telium Support Group wrote: > Block a single IP is the wrong approach (whack-a-mole). You should consider a more comprehensive approach to securing your VoIP environment. Have a look at this wiki: > > https://www.voip-info.org/asterisk-security/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at

I'm trying to allow access to the office from home. But the ip provider (cablevision) blocks udp 5060. I can see the register packets leaving on wireshark, but nothing received by office. Changed to port to 6111 and now the packets show up. In the server I've set port=6111 in the device in sip.conf, but * is NOT listening for 6111: netstat -an | grep 5060 tcp 0 0