similar to: use of EC2

Still a shared resource. I don't see the benefit. Even beyond the shared resource bit, with the kind of IO you are likely to be pushing, you will want a decent NAS with lots of spindles and fibre channel to your hosts. j On 03/08/2015 10:51 AM, Jai Rangi wrote: > Digital ocean offers ssd on all the virtual machines. Uptime is good. > > Jai Rangi > Www.didforsale.com

Amazon instances are shared resources. I wouldn't want to count on timing or disk throughput, and you can't just ask them to do "ssd" - its a virtual machine! 500 simultaneous recordings is a hefty load, and I would want to know that the underlying hardware is dedicated to the task. Sure you see lots of posts about hosting asterisk and/or freeswitch on EC2. I have done it

Digital ocean offers ssd on all the virtual machines. Uptime is good. Jai Rangi Www.didforsale.com www.cebodtelecom.com www.cebod.com > On Mar 8, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere <jeff at jeff.net> wrote: > > > Amazon instances are shared resources. I wouldn't want to count on timing or disk throughput, and you can't just ask them to do "ssd" - its a

Hi Jeff Are you aware of any challenges of hosting it on AWS? It will help me to work out alternate plan. Is there any recommendation? Should I split it to multiple instances and balance traffic across multiple small server instances? I can use Kamailio to balance traffic. I see many posts referring to AWS deployment. Please help me to choose AWS server instance. *Thanks & Regards,*

Hi I plan to host Asterisk instances on AWS/EC2 servers. Requirement is to run asterisk instance with transcoding (g.729 + g.711) and full recording. Number of concurrent calls expected are 500+. 2 instances will be configured for 100% redundancy. Heart beat will be used to determine active instance. How should I choose EC2 instance? How many vCPU, RAM should be selected? I am assuming that

Why use Amazon? With that kind of load I would want dedicated servers. Call Rackspace or Softlayer. j On 03/06/2015 11:59 AM, Amit Patkar wrote: > Hi > > I plan to host Asterisk instances on AWS/EC2 servers. > Requirement is to run asterisk instance with transcoding (g.729 + > g.711) and full recording. Number of concurrent calls expected are > 500+. 2 instances will be

I have 11.4.0 on an Amazon EC2 instance. SIP works fine, but I can't get iax to work. I've opened 4569 in the EC2 Security Group. I'm using the zoiper client. Using tcpdump I can see the zoiper packets coming in on 4569, but nothing shows on the asterisk cli. Frame 33: 79 bytes on wire (632 bits), 79 bytes captured (632 bits) on interface 0 0000 12 31 3b 12 40 84 fe ff ff ff

Why is using ulaw or alaw an unlikely scenario? I wouldn't use anything but ulaw\alaw. The Bells can compete on price and will if they have to. Where they CAN'T compete is quality. If there were something better than 711, I'd offer that. Well, there is 722, but not many things support it. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original

Asterisk-users, Our two-part tutorial explaining how to use VoIP and Asterisk in Amazon?s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) has garnered quite a bit of attention. But due to the time required to complete the many steps needed to get up and running, some of you have asked if it is possible to create a much simpler to install ?pre-built? Asterisk EC2 ?instance.? In short, yes it is. And we?ve

Hi, My puppet master version:- #puppet --version 2.7.19 (Puppet Enterprise 2.7.0) While bootstrapping a new instance with my puppet master on Ec2,I am getting this error #puppet node_aws bootstrap --type t1.micro --image ami-00934969 --keyname ec2 --login root --keyfile ~/.ssh/ec2.pem --mode agent notice: Creating new instance ... notice: Creating new instance ... Done notice: Creating

Need help for uploading a public key for a new EC2 (AMI) user to tmp folder. Any help on this appreciated. Follow the steps http://aws.amazon.com/articles/1233 i.e not able to pass this step "Copy all the public key files that you generated to a temporary place on your instance:" Steps: 1. SSH into my EC2 instance and logged in as su 2. Created a user "geoman" and with a

Hi, I am new to puppet. I have configured puppet master and agent. 1. Executed this "*puppetca --sign ip-10-194-18-145.ec2.internal*" command in puppet master instance. It returns an output like * notice: Signed certificate request for ip-10-194-18-145.ec2.internal* * notice: Removing file Puppet::SSL::CertificateRequest ip-10-194-18-145.ec2.internal at

Akhilesh, I have implemented several ec2 instances with both sip and iax2 and have no problems with xlite or hard phones. Have you already opened the ports in the vpc security group on the Amazon side? Let me know is I can help. --James On Apr 24, 2015 3:34 AM, "akhilesh chand" <omakhileshchand at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Could you tell how can I change the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/24/2015 03:34 PM, akhilesh chand wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Could you tell how can I change the protocol of corresponding port > means 5060 is configured with tcp protocol I want to configured > with udp. When I execute nmap -p5060 xx.xx.xx.xx I got below > output > > > [root at ip-172-31-32-117 cel]# nmap -p5060

Hi, I was previously using an EC2 AMI where i was logging as root, and i could bootstrap nodes. I am now using Amazon AMIs ( http://aws.amazon.com/fr/amazon-linux-ami ) and they require login as ec2-user. The problem is that if i run puppet node bootstrap --login ec2-user, it will detect it and run my install script as with sudo, which is fine, but sudo will not run it because it is configured by

Tomorrow, I intend to push a change to mirrorlist.centos.org nodes that will have a (good) impact to CentOS EC2 instances running from AWS network. Thanks to AWS, sponsoring the required backend infra for this to happen, our mirrorlist nodes will redirect yum/dnf operations internally in the EC2/AWS network. What does that mean for you ? - faster updates (due to Cloudfront caching, and so most

On 04/01/2016 07:04 PM, Peter Steele wrote: > On 04/01/2016 02:07 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> On 03/31/2016 06:43 PM, Peter Steele wrote: >>> I've created an EC2 AMI for AWS that essentially represents a CentOS >>> 7 "hypervisor" image. I deploy instances of these in AWS and create >>> an number of libvirt based lxc containers on each of these

On 03/31/2016 06:43 PM, Peter Steele wrote: > I've created an EC2 AMI for AWS that essentially represents a CentOS 7 > "hypervisor" image. I deploy instances of these in AWS and create an > number of libvirt based lxc containers on each of these instances. The > containers run fine within a single host and have no problem > communicating with themselves as well as

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 21.04.15 um 13:38 schrieb akhilesh chand: > Hi Guenther, > > When I executed nmap -p5060 <xx.xx.xx.xx> I got below output. > > [root at ip-172-31-32-117 cel]# nmap -p5060 xx.xx.xx.xx > > Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-04-21 11:19 UTC Nmap > scan report for

I''m looking at using EC2 for hosting deploying my Rails site. The reasons for the decision are these: I want something that will work for 10 users, but with capacity to expand to 10,000,000 if needed. EC2 starts at $15/month (before bandwidth) which seems reasonable even for a site in its infancy. And the costs seem to scale up well, along with the capacity. There isn''t the