similar to: How does chan_sip match an ACK?

In article <mfbt6f$9rt$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that > is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is > performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 > system on a public IP. > > My question is

Hi, I'm trying to diagnose a particularly elusive problem, and am wondering if anyone else here has seen anything similar and can offer any ideas. I have a conference bridge running Asterisk 1.2.32 (with slight mods), in a colo talking via a LAN to an ITSP using SIP/RTP. It is dedicated to a single customer. On several occasions over the last few months, the customer has reported instances

I am seeing some curious behaviour with a 1.2.32 system, which I do not understand and so can't work out how to fix it. I have a PRI routed to context default. Here is the complete default context: [default] exten => _9X.,1,Dial(IAX2/m1peer/${EXTEN:1}) exten => _20XX,1,Dial(IAX2/sipeer/${EXTEN}) exten => _X.,1,Dial(IAX2/m1peer/${EXTEN}) exten =>

I have some more investigation to do on this, but I wanted to see if anyone here had any insight into the issue I've run into. The hardware is a HP DL360 G6 with a TE420 gen 5 4-port T1 PRI card. It is one of several systems that have been running without issue since 2010/2011. They have all been running CentOS 4 32-bit with Zaptel 1.4.12.1 (with patch for gen 5 card), libpri 1.2.8 and

In article <CAHZ_z=w5DMg93gShtC93kuC+fnmraPgV46BS956U5BQXVgyhxg at mail.gmail.com>, Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > > I have some more investigation to do on this, but I wanted to see if anyone > > here had any insight into the issue I've run into. > > >

I had a SIP problem on an 11.5.0 system that I look after. It registers with a SIP trunk provider, and at one point the provider had an issue that caused registration to fail. The problem was that Asterisk did not keep retrying, and it was not until it was restarted that registration was re-established. Here are the entries in the full log: [Nov 5 21:19:12] NOTICE[3248] chan_sip.c: --

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > In article <CAHZ_z=w5DMg93gShtC93kuC+fnmraPgV46BS956U5BQXVgyhxg@ > mail.gmail.com>, > > Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Tony

I have a system running CentOS 5.9 and DAHDI 2.6.2 with a 2-port E1 card using the wct4xxp driver (also using Asterisk 11.5.0, but that isn't relevant to the question). With DAHDI and Asterisk started, the system appears to run normally, as far as I can tell from limited testing. I am monitoring User, System and Nice CPU usage using SNMP and MRTG, and I have noticed that when I have started

In article <n009u2$85v$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, > although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come > across this issue. > > I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this > package was updated

Ok, that sounds a little more elegant. Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop it from downloading at all? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3 > g at mail.gmail.com>, > Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com>

@tonymountifield Does this still hold true? https://superuser.com/a/1075837 On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis

Roberto estoy en uruguay en estoos momentos. Recien lllego el miercoles El mar 31, 2013 1:59 p.m., <asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com> escribi?: > Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

In article <CAG2kNCyjsQZ2qW_8BBLp8BH_20=JgxoEYpn9BSwZhXg7_rHBbg at mail.gmail.com>, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I am just applying the latest C6 updates to a couple of KVM Linodes. > > It appears that the latest update of util-linux-ng has

worked came to one ring only now. Thank you very much. If I use TE410 or TE405 instead of X100P. do it make that first ring disappear? Shakil -----Original Message----- From: tony@softins.clara.co.uk [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:27 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X100PCard In

If you are using GRUB 0.97 (legacy GRUB), then this capability is provided by the "default saved" and "fallback" commands. See sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 in the manual: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/legacy/grub.html >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Tony Mountifield >Sent:

In article <20141215113303.E0AE4A00424 at mail.centos.org>, Rushton Martin <JMRUSHTON at qinetiq.com> wrote: > If you are using GRUB 0.97 (legacy GRUB), then this capability is > provided by the "default saved" and "fallback" commands. See sections > 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 in the manual: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/legacy/grub.html

If you are using GRUB 0.97 (legacy GRUB), then this capability is provided by the "default saved" and "fallback" commands. See sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 in the manual: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/legacy/grub.html >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Tony Mountifield >Sent:

In article <CAGkb5vfXkJcbpQWupuZG0xp8_gTgv+55+YrZf8VdF0maiO9UfQ at mail.gmail.com>, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> >

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love

In article <55D2174F.70509 at centos.org>, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 08/17/2015 11:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 08/17/2015 10:57 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> I recently applied updates to a CentOS 5 box running MySQL. I've discovered > >> that the new version of openssl, 0.9.8e-36.0.1.el5_11, breaks MySQL SSL > >>