similar to: sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?"

2015 Feb 20
2
sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:46:13 -0500, Andres wrote: > A "sip set debug on" will give you more info on why you are getting the > 404. It probably has to do something with your context/dialplan. on tleilax: tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip set debug on SIP Debugging enabled tleilax*CLI> on doge: thufir at doge:~$ thufir at doge:~$ sudo sipsak -vv -s sip:devries at
2015 Feb 20
0
sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?
On 2/20/15 6:15 AM, thufir wrote: > What's the difference between user "123" and "devries"? Based on the > output here, they seem the same..? > > tleilax*CLI> > tleilax*CLI> sip show users > Username Secret Accountcode > Def.Context ACL Forcerport > 201 password 201 > default
2015 Feb 20
0
sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?
On 2/20/15 2:29 PM, thufir wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:46:13 -0500, Andres wrote: > > >> A "sip set debug on" will give you more info on why you are getting the >> 404. It probably has to do something with your context/dialplan. > > on tleilax: > > tleilax*CLI> > tleilax*CLI> sip set debug on > SIP Debugging enabled > tleilax*CLI>
2015 Feb 20
2
sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:35 -0500, Andres wrote: > This is showing nothing so I don't think your test message even made it > here. I think it looped in the 'doge' server. I was wondering the same thing :) in tleilax, I looked in /var/log/asterisk/messages and see: [Feb 20 15:13:19] VERBOSE[3661] chan_sip.c: [Feb 20 15:13:19] <--- SIP read from UDP:192.168.1.3:38154
2015 Feb 19
0
sipsak: 404 error
Hi, I **think** that I have user of thufir101, because I get a 200 response below, but I also get a 404. It seems to depend on how I send the ip address/fqdn? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201 password 201 default No Yes
2015 Feb 16
3
LAN sip-to-sip
I'm reading the O'Reilly "Asterisk the definitive guide", 4th ed, with a starfish on it. In some ways, astonishing that it's not really that definitive, it's more general -- and it only clocks in at one ream of paper! In any event, I'm having some port problems on my home network: http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/81752/ I need to open ports for
2015 Feb 20
0
sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?
On 2/20/15 3:20 PM, thufir wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:35 -0500, Andres wrote: > >> This is showing nothing so I don't think your test message even made it >> here. I think it looped in the 'doge' server. > > I was wondering the same thing :) > > > in tleilax, I looked in /var/log/asterisk/messages and see: > > [Feb 20 15:13:19]
2015 Feb 21
0
connecting with Ekiga; diagnostic tools
I think I'm able to connect with Ekiga, at least it reports "registered". Curiously, when I exit Ekiga and switch to SFLphone, it isn't able to connect with the exact same parameters; it just says "trying" and never resolves. I'm not able to test outside connectivity because of too many hops: thufir at doge:~$ thufir at doge:~$ sudo sipsak -vv -s sip:thufir
2015 Feb 18
0
ports, routers and firewalls
I just want to make a SIP call from 192.168.1.3 to 192.168.1.4; or not even a call. Ring? Beep? Ping? Some sort of "hello world" connection. 192.168.1.1 netgear router 192.168.1.2 asterisk (vicidial) 192.168.1.3 ubuntu client 192.168.1.4 mac OSX client (not shown) Do I have a firewall problem which would impact a soft phone from establishing a connection?
2015 Feb 22
2
dialplan contexts syntax and terminology
I'm looking into the dialplan specifics: tleilax:~ # tleilax:~ # cat /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf [general] static=yes writeprotect=no [globals] CONSOLE=Console/dsp ; Console interface for demo TRUNK=DAHDI/r1 ; Trunk interface TRUNKX=DAHDI/r2 ; 2nd trunk interface TRUNKIAX=IAX2/ASTtest1:test at 10.10.10.16:4569 ; IAX trunk
2015 Feb 16
1
SIP show peers: UNREACHABLE
I'm trying to configure SIP trunking. Now, I'm referencing "Asterisk the definitive guide", 4th ed. While I don't have the page handy, I was reading the suggestion to try SIP to SIP before proceeding to outside connectivity. I'm aware that SIP trunking is a construct, but am, obviously, learning the system. What I'd like to do is from the CLI "ping"
2015 Feb 16
0
LAN sip-to-sip
It looks as if that is more of a question/issue with your router, rather than Asterisk. I have SIP devices working on my LAN, all hardwired, and have no need to open any ports or have the router address SIP in any way My switch is not managed, and the router ports on the LAN side are all unmanaged, just a huge Ethernet "wirenut" You SHOULD be able to communicate between devices on the
2015 Feb 22
0
101 called 102 success :)
I called 102 from 101 successfully! I have everything connected to my home router. Asterisk is running on tleilax, so I used my Android phone to call doge. Worked like a charm. I'd been thinking that the firewall was blocking connections, but not at all. Anyhow, thanks to everyone who's help me out. I'm sure I'll have other problems, but huge milestone. -Thufir
2015 Feb 22
0
dialplan contexts syntax and terminology
READ READ READ .... http://www.asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/asterisk-DP-Basics.html Regards, Mitul Limbani, Business Head, Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 110 Reena Complex, Opp. Nathani Steel, Vidyavihar (W), Mumbai - 400 086. India http://www.enterux.com/ http://www.entvoice.com/ email: mitul at enterux.in DID: +91-22-71967196 Cell: +91-9820332422 On Sun, Feb 22,
2017 Jan 17
2
How to send SIP_NOTIFY messages with variable content ?
I would be very interested in using sipsak for something like this. What have you tried so far? -Thufir On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Olivier wrote: > Thinking over my previous, I wonder if sipsak could be used to send > outgoing SIP NOTIFY messages. > Would both Asterisk and sipsak be able to share networks resources ? > > Thoughts ? > > 2017-01-16 14:10 GMT+01:00 Olivier
2015 Mar 20
4
UNREACHABLE peer
I wasn't able to get much out of babytel, beyond the fact that I was, apparently, sending options which is why I'm not getting 200 OK. How can I, generally speaking, ping/telnet or otherwise test the connection to get more data? A connection to this peer directly from a softphone, Jitsi, works fine. linux-k7qk*CLI> linux-k7qk*CLI> sip show peer testcarrier * Name :
2004 Sep 22
3
fw to fw question
Hi. I''m a happy shorewall user. I found something that looks like a possible bug. I''m using shorewall on a single computer at home. I''m using the privoxy proxy server and dansguardian content filter. I configured shorewall based on the "one interface" example from the shorewall.net website. I set the firewall up so that users cannot directly connect to
2009 Mar 31
2
[LLVMdev] How to use the JIT with llvm-gfortran ?
Hi all, I am having a look at llvm-gfortran; it compiles OK, but I do not know how to using the JIT as described in http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#tutorial. With llvm-gcc I managed to invoke the lli properly, but with llvm-gfortran compiled programs, it fails with the following message: philou at tleilax:~/gcc/llvm/install/bin$ lli ./main.bc 'main' function not found in
2008 Oct 04
3
ggplot2: how to combine position=stack and position=dodge in a single graph?
Hi ggplot experts, I need to plot two time series of stacked data: a barchart with bars for each month. To compare the data of two years I need to combine both time series with in a single graph via position=doge. How should I do that? I tried the following scenario: I added two layers with the time series of the stacked data for both years. That worked well exept the bars are obscuring each
2010 Mar 12
1
simple plot in ggplot2, wrong error bars
I was wondering if anyone could help me with this, simple problem. I am essentially following the example on Hadley's webpage (http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/geom_errorbar.html), but it still doesn't make any sense to me. df <- data.frame(trt = factor(c("intact", "intact", "removed", "removed")), coon = c(0.093, 0.06, 0.057, 0.09), group =