similar to: Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

Thanks for responding, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:45 PM, George Joseph <george.joseph at fairview5.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio G?mez Soto < > antonio.gomez.soto at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. >> Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact.

Joshua, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: [..snip..] > Also I notice, an AOR does seem do be directly correlated with an auth >> record, so why are >> they separate in the configuration, why not unify the aor and the auth >> objects? >> > > They aren't at all. Auth = Authentication. Used to authenticate

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio G?mez Soto < antonio.gomez.soto at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. > Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. > > I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings > on a phone. > There's some info on the wiki here...

Hi, Yes, we're implementing the dialplan in realtime too. Here the contents of sorcery.conf: [res_pjsip] endpoint=realtime,ps_endpoints aor=realtime,ps_aors contact=realtime,ps_contacts [res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_ip] identify=realtime,ps_endpoint_id_ips Cheers, Francisco. From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: > > <snip> > > >> I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a >> one-to-one relationship. >> >> So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but >> an aor >> can exist without an auth, why

Hi all, (sending this again from the correct address) I'm running Asterisk 13.8.0 (I need to check if that happens with 13.9.1 too when I have the time to build it) with PJSIP realtime config. I've defined several aors in the table ps_aors, like this (real url replaced by myurl): *CLI> pjsip show aor pbx-node-1 Aor: <Aor..............................................>

Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: > > So basically, the 'contact' in the AOR is just an ip address (or > 'dynamic', in which case it accepts > incoming registrations). A contact is a SIP term, it's a way of getting to something. (IP address+port) > So what happens if one endpoint has multiple AOR's which are registered > from different ip addresses. > And

I am running asterisk 13.1.0 In pjsip.conf, the endpoint section has an aors and an auth field. I can name the auth field anything I want. The key is to set the auth=field accordingly. However, when I try this with the aors field, it never works. It seems I have to name the aors=field to match the name of the endpoint section. Is this correct? Would there ever be a need for multiple aors to

I just realized that you are asking about dynamic AORs, not static Contacts in an AOR. That may be the difference. I have never actually tried giving a dynamic AOR a different name. And you wouldn't want more than one dynamic AOR, you'd just use an AOR that allowed more than 1 contact. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:59 PM Trey Hilyard <kctrey at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know

Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: <snip> > > I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a > one-to-one relationship. > > So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but > an aor > can exist without an auth, why was the auth object created in the first > place, > instead of extending the aor object with username/password/etc

I have the following configuration... [aor3] type = aor max_contacts = 1 remove_existing = yes [auth3] type = auth username = 1004 password = SuperSecretProbation [1004] type = endpoint context = IS transport = transport1 auth = auth3 aors = aor3 accountcode = 3 dtmf_mode = rfc4733 device_state_busy_at = 2 force_rport = no moh_passthrough = yes disallow = all allow = ulaw acl = acl1 When a

I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But I can't configure the endpoint. pjsip: [obi202-auth](!) type = auth auth_type = userpass password = <mypass> [obi202-aor](!) type = aor max_contacts = 2 ; ===== endpoints ======== [gv-voice](obi202-endpoint) auth = gv-voice aors = gv-voice identify_by=auth_username ;identify_by=username ; I also tried

Hi! Installing new asterisk server and decided to use chan_pjsip. While module reload I get: y 12 15:33:04] ERROR[21137]: config_options.c:715 aco_process_var: Could not find option suitable for category '3567' named 'inband_progress' at line 867 of [May 12 15:33:04] ERROR[21137]: res_sorcery_config.c:317 sorcery_config_internal_load: Could not create an object of type

Using pjsip 2.7.2 on Asterisk 15.5 Really struggling to make sense of translating these old 1.8 SIP instructions into a neat pjsip_wizard conf suitable for 2018 http://wiki.sip2sip.info/projects/sip2sip/wiki/SipDevicesAsterisk#Version-18 In pjsip_wizard.conf, I have the following, which seems to get me registered, and it responds to an incoming call, but I always get this: [Jul 28 18:32:29]

Hi, I realise this is an old question, but I’m struggling to get my head around it. The ERD suggests that endpoints can link to multiple AoRs In what situation would you actually use this? Given that mapping of inbound calls is primary done to the endpoint, it looks to me like most of the scenarios where this might be beneficial are actually not possible? One example I had envisaged was being

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 10:04 AM, sean darcy wrote: > On 4/5/19 10:36 AM, sean darcy wrote: > > I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But > > I can't configure the endpoint. > > > > pjsip: > > > > [obi202-auth](!) > > type = auth > > auth_type = userpass > > password = <mypass> > > >

Greetings ! My goal is to get Twilio trunking working, and with TLS/SRTP. I see this concerning message in my log: [Feb 7 16:50:26] ERROR[20596] res_sorcery_config.c: Could not create an object of type 'endpoint' with id ?twilio' from configuration file ?pjsip.conf? Thus, ?pjsip show endpoints? does not show the endpoint for the Twilio trunk. Hoping for a sanity check of

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote: > Joshua > > That is the interesting part of it. We took our configs and database > tables from our working 13.12.2 deployments and tried to use them with > our > new 13.17.1 deployments and we are having issues where the tables are not > working. On the new server asterisk keeps saying it can't find the

Hello. Asterisk 13.2, PJSIP. Problem: I do not get any AMI events when changing the status of the contact. When using chan_sip I got "peerstatus" event. When using res_pjsip and devices (endpoint configuration) I got "peerstatus" event. When using res_pjsip.so and OUTBOUND REGISTRATION WITH OUTBOUND AUTHENTICATION i got "registry" event. When using

Hello, In Asterisk 11 it is possible to set extensions on DB table (sipppers) and also in sip.conf. But in Asterisk 13 apparently this is not possible: as I tried to set in ps_endpoints and also in pjsip.conf but only the realtime endpoints are loaded. Is there a way to use realtime + static modes at the same time for the ps_endpoints lookup using PJSIP. Thanks -------------- next part