similar to: Inbound call from sip peer to internal webrtc peer fails while internal sip-webrtc calls work

On 05/12/14 16:46, Olli Heiskanen wrote: > INVITE that Asterisk (at port 5070) receives: > PU.BL.IC.IP:5060 > PU.BL.IC.IP:5070: SIP, length: 1046 > INVITE sip:660 at testers.com > <mailto:sip%3A660 at testers.com>;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 > Record-Route: <sip:PU.BL.IC.IP;lr=on;ftag=41030177> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >

Hello, I have a problem with a call between 2 webrtc clients. Asterisk removes the ice-related lines from the sdp when it sends the INVITE out, and the called webrtc client rejects the INVITE due to the missing ice lines. Both webrtc clients are defined exactly the same way, same values in all fields except the number of the peer. There's probably something I've changed that causes this

Hello, I'm trying to get calls working between websocket clients and sip clients. For clients I have sip.js based clients on chrome, Zoipers and a Grandstream phone. Challenge here is I'd like to have Kamailio and rtpengine to handle the bridging between different rtp profiles but Asterisk changes them in the sdp bodies along the way. I'm using Asterisk 11.11.0. Is there a way to

Greetings, I've noticed a problem that might originate from my Asterisk configuration, could use a hand in sorting it out. Problem is a 488 response from Asterisk whenever it gets RTP/SAVPF profile in the SDP. My current setup has Asterisk Kamailio realtime integration, and Kamailio uses dispatcher to route calls for Asterisk to handle. Now I have only one Asterisk, on the same machine as

Hello, I was testing with sdp and something came up worth asking: While calling from a webrtc client to another (chrome, sip.js) Asterisk receives the following sdp and rejects it with 488 Not Acceptable. Why does this happen, what's wrong with the sdp? The second sdp body below is accepted instead. Both have rtp profile RTP/SAVPF, difference is that the second one was produced by rtpengine,

Can anyone recommend a good WebRTC phone to use with Asterisk? I do not mind if it is commercial or open source. Customers are starting to ask for web solutions and we need to start testing. -- Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Carlos Ch?vez +52 (55)9116-91161

For the client: JSSIP and Sipml5. If you are going to be coding something up yourself I like the JSSIP 0.5.x javascript interfaces. If you are simply going to use a pre-canned one then sipml5 works pretty well and remembers your settings in localstorage. I haven't used any closed source versions since the above works really well for us. For the server: If you are using Asterisk 1.8

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Jarrod Cuzens <jarrod at mogl.com> wrote: > For those that were interested I have attached the kamailio.cfg which we > have working with Kamailio 4.2.1 and Asterisk 1.8.23/32. Specifically, the > following yum packages: > > kamailio.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 > @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms > kamailio-auth-ephemeral.x86_64

For those that were interested I have attached the kamailio.cfg which we have working with Kamailio 4.2.1 and Asterisk 1.8.23/32. Specifically, the following yum packages: kamailio.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms kamailio-auth-ephemeral.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms kamailio-bdb.x86_64 4.2.1-4.1 @home_kamailio_v4.2.x-rpms

Hello all, Some time before Christmas, a project was started. The task was to enhance an existing LiveCD solution with User-mode Linux. A number of requirements was stated, where the greatest challenge was to fit 10 virtual routers within an old no-name PC with only 256MB Ram. And the solution must still be run from a LiveCD. Thanks to Xen, the task was possible to complete. -But, what does it

I am using Asterisk 11.3.0 and just updated Nightly to 24.0a1 (2013-06017) and get a SIP 488 Not Acceptable Here response. I have no problems using the same Asterisk configuration and the same page to make a call from Chrome. I have seen other people post a similar issue, but I have not seen a solution. If someone with good knowledge of this issue were to respond with "this is a known

Hello, I noticed a strange thing while testing my Asterisk-Kamailio Realtime setup. In an INVITE the From and To headers contain the same number when calling through a Realtime integration setup. This happens when the INVITE leaves Asterisk. Can you guys tell me what might be causing this? I have 660 at testers.com as a websocket client and 700 at testers.com (caller) using a Zoiper client (db

Hi All. I'm running some tests with the latest Asterisk SVN-branch-12-r410493M compiled with fresh github pjsip and srtp 1.4.2 on an i386 centOS machine (2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.i686). As a client I'm using the sipMLP WebRTC javascript softphone running on Chrome 33.0.1750.146 m. I have the softphone correctly registered on the Asterisk machine but as soon as I try to start a new call

I've seen the following appear in some tests with Asterisk 11.11: WARNING[3938][C-00000003]: chan_sip.c:10535 process_sdp: Rejecting secure audio stream without encryption details: audio 54908 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF 109 0 8 101 Specifically, it always happens from a Firefox 24 host but it works without this error from another host running Firefox 26 I did a diff on the SDP and couldn't see

I am having trouble getting Google Chrome to accept a WebRTC call coming from Asterisk, even though Firefox can (now) accept the same call without issue. My setup is as follows: Server: CentOS 7 x86_64 (Elastix 4 RC) with IP: 10.1.0.4 192.168.5.146 asterisk-11.21.0 patched to work around https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25659 openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.2.x86_64 [root at elx4 ~]#

Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain

hi, is there someone with working asterisk13+chan_sip+SIP.js/sipml5 ? or is chan_pjsip better supported? or the recommended way for asterisk is use respoke.io? my problem with asterisk13+chan_sip+sipml5(the same problem is with SIP.js) chan_sip.c:10496 process_sdp: Can't provide secure audio requested in SDP offer " sip.conf (important parts) [vr1a882] ... nat=force_rport,comedia

Hi, I was able to use Unsniff to validate that the incoming 20 byte payloads of audio from the downstream IAX2 trunk was definitely G.729a whilst Asterisk 16.13.0 transcodes to G.711a unnecessarily. Media is confirmed as having been negotiated as g729 on all four streams. Nuance with this call is that it's from a WebRTC client which doesn't transmit any audio, could this be influencing

I download app_valetparking.c from http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/misc/apps/app_valetparking.c and followed the directions on http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/misc/apps/app_valetparking.README I am using asterisk-1.0.0 any suggestions [root@localhost asterisk]# astxs -install apps/app_valetparking.c gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarat ions -g -Iinclude

Hello I am trying to set up webRTC video calls from my Chrome webbrowser (Fedora) to my Chrome webbrowser (Windows 10). There is local video input (I can see myself), but never video on the receiving side. This is the case in both directions (so it makes no difference which peer is calling which peer). Both webRTC SIP peers have opus and H264 codec in their peer definition :   Video