similar to: [Bug 831] Allow agent forwarding in sftp & scp

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #9 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> --- Mass close of all bugs fixed in 8.4

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2683|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #3328|0 |1 is

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com --- Comment #3 from kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com --- Patch needs to be updated, as it will

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #594 is|0 |1 obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com --- Created attachment

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |3162 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED

On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 at 09:07, Lionel Cons <lionelcons1972 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 07:07, Ron Frederick <ronf at timeheart.net> wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 2025, at 6:02?PM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > [...] > > > Damien pointed out that it's possible to do a reasonable but not > perfect sparse file support by

On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 07:39, Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com> wrote: [...] > Problem is that if their default shell isn't sh, ash, dash, bash, zsh, etc. then things break. > Is there a workaround to allow scp/sftp to continue to work even for non-shell accounts? sftp should work regardless of the user's shell since it is invoked as a ssh subsystem

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 14:07, David Newall <openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote: > [about scp] That's just awful, and I should have > thought it was not at all necessary. Am I missing something? > If you're saying that the scp protocol is an unfixable mess then the openssh team has been agreeing[0] with you for at least a decade and a half. We fix what we can, but some

On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 07:07, Ron Frederick <ronf at timeheart.net> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2025, at 6:02?PM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 at 16:14, Ron Frederick <ronf at timeheart.net <mailto:ronf at timeheart.net>> wrote: > >> [...] > >> If you don?t get all of the requested ranges in a single request,

On Apr 3, 2025, at 6:02?PM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 at 16:14, Ron Frederick <ronf at timeheart.net <mailto:ronf at timeheart.net>> wrote: >> [...] >> If you don?t get all of the requested ranges in a single request, additional requests can be sent starting at just past the end of the last range previously returned.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1042 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #917| |ok+ Flag| |

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2595|ok?(dtucker at zip.com.au) |ok+ Flags| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Blocks| |1626 Status|NEW

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:01:00PM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > You could try this patch which defers resetting the "tried" flag on the > pubkeys until the list of authentication methods changes. I don't have > a server with this behaviour so I'm not sure if it helps (and I'm not > sure it's the right thing to do anyway). I think this is a better way to

On 2015-11-26 14:16, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Tinker <tinkr at openmailbox.org> wrote: >> On 2015-11-26 13:33, Darren Tucker wrote: > [...] >>> What is the script going to do? > > You didn't answer this. Register the login to the group's login database. >> How would you do it using bsdauth? >> >> (PAM

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1691 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2010-03-26 10:50:58 EST --- With the

On Mar 6, 2025, at 9:38?PM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > If you want this to happen, I recommend starting by figuring out what > protocol extensions need to be made, and how to support sparse files > on system without SEEK_DATA/HOLE - it should be pretty to do this on > upload without these flags and without extensions. I was inspired by this thread to add sparse

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1276 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1233| |ok+ Flag| |

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1691 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Blocks| |1626 -- Configure bugmail:

On 2015-11-26 13:33, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Tinker <tinkr at openmailbox.org> wrote: >> The goal is to get a script invoked *at login time*, > > This part I follow, but having a script run is just a means to an end > not the end itself. What is the script going to do? > >> so that the authentication only is known to the client