similar to: [Bug 1904] sshd refuses certificate-based authentication if password has expired

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904 mathew <meta at pobox.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from mathew <meta at pobox.com> ---

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904 Summary: sshd refuses certificate-based authentication if password has expired Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904 --- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Ok, so back in 2011 I pointed out that the pam_unix in your account stack is likely the problem. Did you check this before reopening the bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904 Tomas Mraz <t8m at centrum.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t8m at centrum.cz --- Comment #7 from Tomas Mraz <t8m at centrum.cz> --- Actually pam_unix from Linux-PAM 1.3.0

Back again with another oops, which looks suspiciously similiar to the one i posted some days ago (https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2002-May/003587.html). Jun 11 12:11:30 castor kernel: Assertion failure in journal_write_metadata_buffer() at journal.c:406: "buffer_jdirty(jh2bh(jh_in))" ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.18-4custom. Options used -V (default) -k

Hi Stefan, I think what you propose will work, though you should test it thoroughly. I think more generally, "the GlusterFS way" would be to use 2-way replication instead of a distributed volume; then you can lose one of your servers without outage. And re-synchronize when it comes back up. Chances are if you weren't using the SAN volumes; you could have purchased two servers

Dear all, I'm rather new to glusterfs but have some experience running lager lustre and beegfs installations. These filesystems provide active/active failover. Now, I discovered that I can also do this in glusterfs, although I didn't find detailed documentation about it. (I'm using glusterfs 3.10.8) So my question is: can I really use glusterfs to do failover in the way described

Hi Alex, Thank you for the quick reply! Yes, I'm aware that using ?plain? hardware with replication is more what GlusterFS is for. I cannot talk about prices where in detail, but for me, it evens more or less out. Moreover, I have more SAN that I'd rather re-use (because of Lustre) than buy new hardware. I'll test more to understand what precisely "replace-brick"

Hello, When i ssh to a machine and run a command which asks for masked characters (ie a password), the characters which supposed to not show up echo to the screen. I use a public/private key, so there isnt any ssh authentication. castor:~$ ssh -V OpenSSH_3.8.1, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 castor:~$ dmesg|head -2 OpenBSD 3.6-beta (GENERIC) #3: Thu Aug 12 00:01:53 EDT 2004 keoki at

Hi, An update on my work to integrate my Linux server (CentOS 4.3) in AD 2003. Sorry about the long post :) Found this page (http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/3487081) and followed the instructions on it. First, I made sure that the Samba installation is supporting Kerberos, LDAP, AD and Windbind. That was OK. I made sure that /etc/hosts contain the name of the AD

Hi, First, sorry if this is a bit long. I'm having problems finding what is wrong with my setup. Running Samba 3.0.10-1.4E.6 on CentOS 4.3. PDC is AD on windows 2003. Samba and winbind are running. My smb.conf file: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2006/05/30 10:52:16 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MONTREAL realm =

SELinux is preventing 11-dhclient from add_name access on the directory chrony.servers.wlp8s0. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that 11-dhclient should be allowed add_name access on the chrony.servers.wlp8s0 directory by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75761 Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #23 from Pekka Paalanen

Hi, I've recently had the following experience, which may be of help to people here, so I'm mentioning my tests and conclusions. I've recently been observing this behaviour from Samba - this is an easily reproducible problem:- 1/ Open a share 2/ Create a new document in Word. 3/ Make some changes. 4/ Save the document using the save icon on the toolbar, this works as expected. 5/

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Comment #2 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-07-06 21:09

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-09-10 22:12

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-10-18

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409 marc.girod at nokia.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From marc.girod at nokia.com

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-05-14 22:55