similar to: [Bug 2683] New: memory leak in ssh_packet_read_seqnr

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2683] New: memory leak in ssh_packet_read_seqnr"

2020 Oct 19
2
[PATCH] drm: remove unneeded break
From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return or break Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/pll.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c | 3 --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramnv50.c | 1 -
2020 Oct 19
5
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:43 PM Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > normal patch
2023 Feb 28
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/fifo: set nvkm_engn_cgrp_get storage-class-specifier to static
smatch reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/runl.c:33:18: warning: symbol 'nvkm_engn_cgrp_get' was not declared. Should it be static? nvkm_engn_cgrp_get is only used in runl.c, so it should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/runl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2023 Mar 02
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/nvfw/acr: set wpr_generic_header_dump storage-class-specifier to static
gcc with W=1 reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/nvfw/acr.c:49:1: error: no previous prototype for ?wpr_generic_header_dump? [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 49 | wpr_generic_header_dump(struct nvkm_subdev *subdev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wpr_generic_header_dump is only used in acr.c, so it should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> ---
2023 Mar 03
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/fifo: set gf100_fifo_nonstall_block_dump storage-class-specifier to static
gcc with W=1 reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gf100.c:451:1: error: no previous prototype for ?gf100_fifo_nonstall_block? [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 451 | gf100_fifo_nonstall_block(struct nvkm_event *event, int type, int index) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ gf100_fifo_nonstall_block is only used in gf100.c, so it should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at
2023 May 17
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/acr/ga102: set variable ga102_gsps storage-class-specifier to static
smatch reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c:49:1: warning: symbol 'ga102_gsps' was not declared. Should it be static? This variable is only used in its defining file, so it should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2023 Mar 29
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/svm: remove unused ret variable
clang with W=1 reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c:929:6: error: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] int ret; ^ This variable is not used so remove it. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git
2023 Mar 31
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/acr: remove unused loc variable
clang with W=1 reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/acr/lsfw.c:221:7: error: variable 'loc' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] u32 loc, sig, cnt, *meta; ^ This variable is not used so remove it. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/acr/lsfw.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1
2023 Apr 06
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/tu102: remove unused tu102_gr_load function
smatch reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c:210:1: warning: symbol 'tu102_gr_load' was not declared. Should it be static? This function is not used so remove it. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git
2017 Feb 25
3
[Bug 2684] New: calling realloc with a size <= 0
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2684 Bug ID: 2684 Summary: calling realloc with a size <= 0 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: amd64 OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2020 Oct 19
0
[PATCH] drm: remove unneeded break
Hi Tom On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:31:15AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return or break > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> Looks good and builds with no warnings. One of the diffs made me - "oh this looks wrong". But after I looked again it was right and
2020 Aug 27
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: remove redundant check
From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> clang static analysis flags this problem hw.c:271:12: warning: The left operand of '>=' is a garbage value if (pv.M1 >= pll_lim.vco1.min_m ... ~~~~~ ^ This is mostly not a problem because an early check in nouveau_hw_fix_bad_vpll() if (nvbios_pll_parse(bios, pll, &pll_lim)) return; nouveau_hw_get_pllvals(dev, pll,
2023 Apr 07
0
[PATCH] drm/qxl: remove unused num_relocs variable
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:24?AM Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> wrote: > > clang with W=1 reports > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c:149:14: error: variable > 'num_relocs' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] > int i, ret, num_relocs; > ^ > This variable is not used so remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix
2020 Oct 18
0
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On 10/17/20 10:43 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: >> From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> >> >> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. >> I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or >> normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by
2020 Oct 18
0
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting > early acks. Please break it up into
2020 Oct 19
0
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:42:15PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:43 PM Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. >
2019 Jun 27
4
Reverse DNS
Hai Praveen, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Praveen Ghimire [mailto:PGhimire at sundata.com.au] > Verzonden: donderdag 27 juni 2019 13:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > CC: 'L.P.H. van Belle' > Onderwerp: RE: [Samba] Reverse DNS > > Hi Guys, > > Thank you for your emails. Here is the info > > /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.dhcp >
2005 May 12
0
[PATCH] Trusted IRIX Support
I developed a better prototype quicker than I expected. Please provide feedback. It's been a few years since I've used autoconf, so I'm not certain the new defines were integrated correctly. Jason diff -r -C3 openssh-4.0p1/acconfig.h openssh-4.0p1.trix/acconfig.h *** openssh-4.0p1/acconfig.h Fri Feb 25 17:07:38 2005 --- openssh-4.0p1.trix/acconfig.h Thu May 12 10:32:25
2016 Dec 16
107
[Bug 2647] New: Tracking bug for OpenSSH 7.5 release
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2647 Bug ID: 2647 Summary: Tracking bug for OpenSSH 7.5 release Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: meta Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous
2015 Jan 27
0
[Bug 1213] ssh-keyscan exits in mid-way
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 --- Comment #50 from Daniel Richard G. <skunk at iSKUNK.ORG> --- Okay, tried again with your patch. Here's what I see: [...] # A.B.C.46 SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_4.2 # A.B.C.47 SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_4.2 # A.B.C.47 SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_4.2 # A.B.C.47 SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_4.2 # A.B.C.48 SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_4.2 # A.B.C.48