similar to: [Bug 2646] New: zombie processes when using privilege separation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2646] New: zombie processes when using privilege separation"

2014 Jul 08
2
How to get uuid info inside a lxc container created by libvirt_lxc
Hi , Is there anyway to get uuid info inside a lxc container which is created by libvirt_lxc? For kvm, we can use dmidecode or lshw to get this info inside vm. Is there any tools to do this thing for libvirt lxc? Thanks for any help~ -- ------------ Jackie Best Regards
2009 Dec 08
4
Split comma separated list
Hi all, I'm a beginner user of R. I am stuck at what I thought was a very obvious problem, but surprisingly, I havent found any solution on the forum or online till now. My problem is simple. I have a file which has entries like the following: #ID Value1 List_of_values ID1 0.342 0.01,1.2,0,0.323,0.67 ID2 0.010 0.987,0.056,1.3,1.5,0.4
2010 Jul 26
8
Why does my DomU keep going mad?
Hi All, I''ve got a DomU that sometimes goes mad. I can''t ssh or usually even console to it. The time I did manage to console I got a load of dumps about being out of memory and swap, but couldn''t run any commands to find out which process had gone mad :( From Dom0 I can see the DomU at 100% CPU and can only stop it with a destroy. What can I do/check to find
2009 Dec 09
3
Plotting frequency curve over histogram
Hello, This is a problem for which there seem to be several solutions online, but not really. My question was about plotting a curve over the histogram. All the previous posts and messages talk about generating a *density histogram*using (freq=F) and then plotting the density curve. However, I find that that seriously distorts my data and the plot becomes confounding to the viewer. I was
2020 Mar 31
2
net_connect_unix(imap) failed
Hello everyone, we have a huge problem with dovecot and IMAP connections. we got the following errors: 39665 today dovecot: imap-login: Error: master(imap): net_connect_unix(imap) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable - http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SocketUnavailable (client-pid=29066, client-id=1755, rip=IP, created 562 msecs ago, received 0/4 bytes) we thinks this may be a problem with
2009 Mar 25
11
ActiveRecord: Nested :include erroneous behavior
Hi, Found a simple example breaking on moving to 2.2 from 2.0. This example illustrates the usage of nested :include finder options. class Book < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :distributors end class Distributor < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :book has_many :agents end class Agent < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :distributor has_many :shops end class Shop <
2013 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] creating and inserting a function with variable arguments
Akshay Jain <jivan.molu at gmail.com> writes: > I have tried it, but I always end up with some kind of error. Can you > explain how can I get a function type for function which returns void > (nothing) and it's arguments are (int, int, int, void *, void *, ...) ?? Instead of getting something to cut&paste, you would be much more enriched if the problematic code and the
2013 Apr 16
2
[LLVMdev] creating and inserting a function with variable arguments
I have tried it, but I always end up with some kind of error. Can you explain how can I get a function type for function which returns void (nothing) and it's arguments are (int, int, int, void *, void *, ...) ?? Thanks in advance. On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Akshay Jain <jivan.molu at gmail.com> writes: > > > I am
2023 Mar 19
2
lexical scoping for scripts......
Dear Duncun, What if there is no interactive "session" running? I will be running my scripts automatically from crontab in Linux. THanking you, Yours sincerely, AKSHAY M KULKARNI ________________________________ From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 12:20 AM To: akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com>; R
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
Again, the answer is "interactivity does not matter". On March 19, 2023 12:54:28 PM PDT, akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com> wrote: >Dear Jeff, > I will not be running R command in the shell prompt. So there is no banner, no > prompt. Just running "myscript.R" from the shell prompt. or from crontab in Linux. I think you get the
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
On 19/03/2023 2:55 p.m., akshay kulkarni wrote: > Dear Duncun, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?What if there is no interactive "session" > running? I will be running my scripts automatically from crontab in Linux. I was talking about the session that is created for the duration of the BATCH run, not some other session that may be running in another process. Sorry for the
2023 Jan 12
4
return value of {....}
Hello Akshay, R is quite inspired by LISP, where this is a common thing. It is not in fact that {...} returned something, rather any expression evalulates to some value, and for a compound statement that is the last evaluated expression. {...} might be seen as similar to LISPs (begin ...). Now this is a very different thing compared to {...} in something like C, even if it looks or behaves
2023 Jan 09
3
return value of {....}
Dear Valentin, But why should {....} "return" a value? It could just as well evaluate all the expressions and store the resulting objects in whatever environment the interpreter chooses, and then it would be left to the user to manipulate any object he chooses. Don't you think returning the last, or any value, is redundant? We are living in the 21st century
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
Dear Jeff, I will not be running R command in the shell prompt. So there is no banner, no > prompt. Just running "myscript.R" from the shell prompt. or from crontab in Linux. I think you get the context..... thanking you, yours sincerely AKSHAY M KULKARNI ________________________________ From: Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> Sent: Monday, March
2017 Dec 15
6
something weird has happened....!!!!!!!!!!
dear Members, Today something weird has happened on my R console. I have attached two screenshots of the same vector in my R console but they differ. Also one of my function returns negative values, even after double checking the code, which should return only positive values.. Whats wrong..? Reinstall R? Thanks for help.... AKSHAY M KULKARNI -------------- next part -------------- A
2023 Apr 04
1
on lexical scoping....
No, there are lots of situations where that doesn't make sense. You don't want to have to define local copies of the functions from every package you use, for example. I think the takeaway is to learn how R scoping works, and keep things simple. That's one reason I tend to avoid "tidyverse" packages. There are a lot of really good ideas in those packages, but
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
What do _you_ mean when you use the term "interactive"? Because R distinguishes between executing code in a function and executing code from the global environment, but it does not care whether a person is doing the typing or not. I get the feeling that you think of your R code in terms of "scripts" when you should be thinking of your code in terms of functions. What
2023 Apr 04
1
on lexical scoping....
Dear Duncan, THanks for the reply...! So the takeaway is that define the symbol in the same environment before using it right!? Thanking you, Yours sincerely, AKSHAY M KULKARNI ________________________________ From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 8:21 PM To: akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com>; Deepayan Sarkar
2023 Apr 12
1
aborting the execution of a script...
This is what I get: > source("~/temp/test.R", echo = TRUE) > print(1) [1] 1 > stop("here") Error in eval(ei, envir) : here I get similar output in every variation I tried. It never prints the 2. On 12/04/2023 8:13 a.m., akshay kulkarni wrote: > Dear Duncan, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?What if I use source() with echo? I am using > that in RStudio.
2023 Jan 09
5
return value of {....}
Dear members, I have the following code: > TB <- {x <- 3;y <- 5} > TB [1] 5 It is consistent with the documentation: For {, the result of the last expression evaluated. This has the visibility of the last evaluation. But both x AND y are created, but the "return value" is y. How can this be advantageous for solving practical problems?