similar to: [Bug 2634] New: KAKI KAKA PASS 1-855(338-0710) || outlook technical support number / (1 855)338+0710 outlook customer service Number Outlook Tech Support Number

On 12.12.2016 16:21, Mart Pirita wrote: > Edit: When using win8, then logs started appear in dovecot.rawlog. But > as win10 gives error in ssl level, before user authentication, then no > debug logs will be written into user dovecot.rawlog folder. > > So how to debug this ssl issue? > > > Aki Tuomi wrote: >> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog >> >>

On 12/12/2016 10:42 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On 12.12.2016 16:21, Mart Pirita wrote: >> Edit: When using win8, then logs started appear in dovecot.rawlog. But >> as win10 gives error in ssl level, before user authentication, then no >> debug logs will be written into user dovecot.rawlog folder. >> >> So how to debug this ssl issue? >> >>

Edit: When using win8, then logs started appear in dovecot.rawlog. But as win10 gives error in ssl level, before user authentication, then no debug logs will be written into user dovecot.rawlog folder. So how to debug this ssl issue? Aki Tuomi wrote: > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog > > can you try this to get rawlogs to find out what happens? > > Aki I'm bit

Hi, I am following this post * http://www.sitepoint.com/ruby-social-gems-linkedin/* for using linked gem and API for getting profile and other stuff But at the end I am getting this error: => Booting WEBrick => Rails 3.2.13 application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server Exiting

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > Thank you David for prompt reply. > > I tried with SmallVector. I inserted elements with push_back(). > But when I retrieve elements using pop_back_val the elements are returned > in reverse order of insertion (I mean like LIFO order). > I need this to be FIFO order. How to achieve that? >

Thank you David for prompt reply. I tried with SmallVector. I inserted elements with push_back(). But when I retrieve elements using pop_back_val the elements are returned in reverse order of insertion (I mean like LIFO order). I need this to be FIFO order. How to achieve that? Regards, Rekha On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > If you

Hi, Thank you David. My question was from a machine independent code analyzer/optimizer perspective where types are of less importance. Hence I felt difficult to understand the IR with the types. Rekha On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:44 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 27 Oct 2014, at 12:46, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > > > Why

This sounds good. Similar to Constant folding. Noted :-) Rekha On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote: > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > If you're looking for something incredibly simple to get started with it > might be fruitful to implement replacement of particular function calls of > constant arguments with the appropriate result.

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Rekha R <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > Ok. Got it. > > If *add nsw* overflows, this results in undefined value. > But then *add* on same arguments results in well-defined value. > > Hence treating first one as redundant based on the second is acceptable. > But vice versa is not. > If they are in different code paths, sure.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106 Bug ID: 1106 Summary: AT&T email support number 1 855-338-0710 at&t email error support phone number Product: ipset Version: 2.2.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

Dear Geskus, I want to develop a prediction model. I followed your paper and analysed thro' weighted coxph approach. I can develop nomogram based on the final model also. But I do not know how to do internal validation of the model and subsequently obtain calibration plot. Is it possible to use Wolbers et al Epid 2009 approach 9 (R code for internal validation and calibration) . It is

On 09/26/2013 10:51 AM, Rekha R wrote: > Hi, > > Would like to know the parsing strategy used in LLVM - top-down, > bottom-up, or any other? > > -- > Rekha > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > Do

If you don't care about efficiency you can push (or at least insert) at the front of a(small or otherwise) vector. On Nov 3, 2013 3:32 AM, "Rekha R" <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing an analysis which requires creating worklist of basic blocks. > The worklist should be in FIFO order. I checked SmallVector (and similar > others) and found

HI All, I am new to asterisk. i want to make outbound calls from asterisk. I tried with many times with the given settings but in vain This is my scenario: I have a *user A* who has registered with sip server(ONDO), I made asterisk to register as a sip client with ONDO, I want to make a call to user A from an extension. My configurations sip.config [general] context=default

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of "C. Bergström" > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:39 AM > To: Rekha R > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] on compiling FORTRAN programs > > On 07/15/14 09:29 PM, Rekha R wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am

Hi, I am trying to understand the semantics of Instructions in llvm. Are the following instructions semantically same? * %add2 = add nsw i32 %add, %add1 %add3 = add i32 %add, %add1* Based on my understanding from the Language Reference Manual, I think they are different. But then why is the *gvn* pass detecting *%add3* as redundant and deleting it? Your views are appreciated. Rekha

On Oct 3, 2013 11:47 PM, "Rekha R" <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was trying to write a sample optimization pass in LLVM, by following instructions in LLVM doc for Writing a New Pass. But then ran into make issues. The issue is with having separate source and build directories. The LLVM doc for 'Getting Started' suggests keeping the two

Dear all, I calculate the test statistic for the KS test outside R, and wish to use R only to calculate the corresponding p-value. Is there a way for doing this? (as far as I see, ks.test() requires raw data as input). Alternatively, is there a way to provide the ks.test() the two CDFs (two samples test) rather than the (x, y) data vectors? Thanks in advance, Rani

Hi All, Trying to get familiar with dplyr so I have a basic question: How to summarise sum(Values) per species, maintaining Code column (each species has a Code): Species Values Code 1 Acanthocybium solandri 33 LC 2 Makaira nigricans 20 VU 3 Makaira nigricans 20 VU 4. Makaira nigricans

Dear Raja, A Fine and Gray model can be fitted using the standard coxph function with weights that correct for right censoring and left truncation. Hence I guess any function that allows to perform stepwise regression with coxph should work. See e.g. my article in Biometrics https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01420.x, or the vignette "Multi-state models and competing risks" in the