similar to: [Bug 1008] GSSAPI authentication fails with Round Robin DNS hosts

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #17 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> --- (In reply to kgizdov from comment #16) > I hope this helps. Not really. Those have a lot of other changes (mostly the GSSAPI key exchange support) and it still uses get_canonical_hostname() which is currently not available in the client. According to Damien reasoning

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #14 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> --- (In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #13) the original patch written in 2006 was against openbsd cvs, and it included a config option to turn it on/off (with the default being off). it largely applied cleanly up through 7.2 until the get_canonical_hostname refactor. since

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjwatson at debian.org --- Comment #15 from Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> --- I think it would make

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Summary: GSSAPI authentication failes with Round Robin DNS hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Kerberos support AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at sxw.org.uk ------- Comment #5 from simon at sxw.org.uk 2006-08-19 08:28 ------- There isn't an easy fix for this, at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #16 from kgizdov <mindrot at kge.pw> --- Apparently, some good Samaritan already made patches compatible with the current version of OpenSSH. There is a package on the Arch User Repo (openssh-gssapi 7.1p2-1) that implements them. Here are the patches themselves:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Additional Comments From dleonard at vintela.com 2005-06-08 22:16 ------- a workaround at http://blog.macnews.de/unspecific/stories/4581/ ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Comment #7 from jan.iven at cern.ch 2006-10-24 02:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=1202) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1202&action=view) (simplified patch - no config option) Given that the GSSAPI library will (unconditionally) use DNS anyway, perhaps we don't need yet another client-side config

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wilkinson <simon at sxw.org.uk> 2007-09-15 20:59:25 --- I've noted this on the mailing list too, but just for the record, the simplified patch is incorrect. GSSAPI != Kerberos, and even within the Kerberos space, some vendors ship with canonicalisation disabled. If we are going to ship a workaround for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.org> --- I think this was answered last year in this thread: https://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2022-May/040285.html and unfortunately it seems there won't be any merging of the GSSAPI patch. :-( There's:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 DarioP <pellegrini.dario at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pellegrini.dario at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from DarioP <pellegrini.dario at gmail.com> --- (In reply to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 kgizdov <mindrot at kge.pw> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at kge.pw --- Comment #12 from kgizdov <mindrot at kge.pw> --- I just wanted to chime in here to say that

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lists at eitanadler.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Oliver Freyermuth <o.freyermuth at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |o.freyermuth at googlemail.com --- Comment #19 from Oliver Freyermuth <o.freyermuth at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928 --- Comment #9 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2010-01-11 17:11:06 EST --- Created an attachment (id=1775) --> (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1775) sshd-gssapi-multihomed.patch I updated patch #1182 to OpenBSD current and fixed a few minor whitespace things. I also removed this warning from the man page:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1626 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail

(was: "Re: Pending OpenSSH release, call for testing", topic drift at its finest :-) Markus Moeller wrote: > Douglas, > > OK three possible settings(hostname,connection IP,GSS_C_NO_NAME) are fine for me too. Does GSS_C_NO_NAME relate to this bug (addressless tickets)? http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 BTW, I opened a bug the the multihomed thing a couple of

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1276 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1233| |ok+ Flag| |

Hi All, I've been poking around various parts of the auth code for a while. Some platforms support failed login counters and it occurs to me that there's as few too many instances of: #ifdef [PLATFORM] if (authenticated == 0 && strcmp(method, "password") == 0) some_login_failure_func(); #endif The attached patch creates a record_failed_login() function in

Hi All. Markus has commited the long-awaited GSSAPI patch to OpenBSD's ssh. There are patches. The first [1] is a straightforward port of the OpenBSD code to Portable. The second [2] contains the parts I've stolen from Simon Wilkinson's portable GSSAPI patch in an attempt to make it build. It is incomplete and doesn't currently work. The PAM support is not there and