similar to: [Bug 2578] New: -W should honor -4 and -b

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172 Sascha Silbe <sascha-openssh-bugs at silbe.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sascha-openssh-bugs at silbe.o | |rg -- Configure

Pete Orrall wrote: >> So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you >> still >> ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? > > I've never had to write my own init scripts before so I'm not feeling > the pain of others, but having professionally managed machines running > SystemD for a while now honestly I

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161 Bug ID: 3161 Summary: ssh -J <public IPv6> <LL IPv6%scopeID> doesn't work as expected Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: 68k OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2635 Bug ID: 2635 Summary: Unable to use SSH Agent and user level PKCS11Provider configuration directive Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi, I haven't been to find this (NetworkManager) change documented. On: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE ens32 7629e52d-bd42-4cd5-a424-8c58e7e0bf37 802-3-ethernet ens32 On: CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE

Yamaban wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:00, m.roth at ... wrote: > >> We've started having a problem with a CentOS 7 server. It looses its >> IPv6 address, if I understand this issue correctly. We can get in, >> if we do ssh -4, though. >> >> In the logs, I'm seeing this about twice an hour: >> <warn> (pid 98466) unhandled DHCP event for

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:09:01AM -0400, Pete Orrall wrote: > > And *why* random NIC names? Quick, you've got servers from 5 > > manufacturers, of different ages... what's the NIC going to be called? Do > > names like enp5s0 offer any convenience to *anyone* not a hardware > > engineer? > > As someone else had stated, it's not related to SystemD but >

Hi, at first I'm not sure if this is the correct list to ask this question. But since I'm using winbind I hope you can help me. I try to realize a kerberized ssh from one client to another. Both clients are member of subdom2.subdom1.example.de and joined to it. The users are from example.de, where subdom1.example.de is a subdomain (bidirectional trust) of example.de and

Package: logtail Version: 1.2.68 Severity: normal Hi, logtail does not cleanly update from logtail2: $ sudo dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/logtail_1.2.68_all.deb (Reading database ... 26564 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking logtail (from .../logtail_1.2.68_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/logtail_1.2.68_all.deb (--install): trying to

Hi all, I have done some tests for the new attributes "check" and "type", could you please help to have a check? And I have some questions about the patch, please help to have a look, Thank you! The questions: 1. in step 4 below, the error message should be updated: Actual results: XML error: invalid mac address **check** value: 'next'. Valid values are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1866 Summary: ssh-keyscan should read .ssh/config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1863 Summary: fingerprint for key for stdin Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh-keygen AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1865 Summary: full public key to syslog Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

hi, Ran into a problem which I thought was an AIXism, but have since found that it can be reproduced on Linux and MacOS. It can NOT be reproduced on OpenBSD. Reproduced on: AIXv7.1 OpenSSH v6.0p1 RedHat 6.8 OpenSSH 5.4p1 Redhat 7.2 OpenSSH 6.6.1p1 MacOS 10.11 (sorry, forgot to grab the OpenSSH version) Could not reproduce on: OpenBSD 5.9-current, march snapshot, OpenSSH_7.2 OpenBSD

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1594 Summary: please add an option to print the pid of -f backgrounded process Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

Hi, I'm having trouble as of about noon today. I noticed I wasn't getting any new messages in Thunderbird. I restarted it and still nothing. I looked at the log, and found nothing from dovecot for a long time (since perhaps noon today). I restarted dovecot, but still it didn't get me new mail. I finally removed dovecot.* in my Maildir folder and restarted dovecot. I'm

Hi, my test host is running Debian/GNU Linux unstable and has virt-manger 0.9.5 and libvirt 1.2.1. I am using encryption and thus have devices in /dev/mapper that are not LVs, for example called /dev/mapper/myvirtualdisk. I'd like to configure libvirt in a way that allows me to directly assign such devices to a VM. This does not work when I create a filesystem directory storage pool in

On 2 January 2018 at 17:08, Marc Haber <mh+openssh-unix-dev at zugschlus.de> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:03:34PM +1030, David Newall wrote: >> On 02/01/18 03:29, Michael Str?der wrote: >> > How high is the risk that this unmaintained device is added to >> > yet-another-bot-net in the Internet-of-shitty-devices or is used to >> > enter parts of your

Hi, what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? Are such packets inevitably dropped? Does a network card drop them when it does checksum verification in hardware even before the packets go anywhere? In general, if someone were to send me UPD packets with invalid checksums over the internet, how far would such packets get? In particular, how likely it is that SRTP

On 02/01/18 03:29, Michael Str?der wrote: > How high is the risk that this unmaintained device is added to > yet-another-bot-net in the Internet-of-shitty-devices or is used to > enter parts of your network. I think that is what is called a straw-man argument.? If a device can be compromised in the way you suggest, then I am sure it will be replaced, but it will be replaced because it