similar to: [Bug 1953] Implementation of xattr in sftp-server for sshfs

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Bug #: 1953 Summary: Implementation of xattr in sftp-server for sshfs Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |calestyo at scientia.net --- Comment #2 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Does anyone know whether anything is going on with SFTP (especially also with repsect to ACLs and XATTRs)? More than a year ago we saw this http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-secsh-filexfer-00 which apparently tried to restart the draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 TomH <Tom at TomHolbrook.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Tom at TomHolbrook.co.uk --- Comment #4 from TomH <Tom at TomHolbrook.co.uk> --- Just adding that the lack of

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Stef Bon <stefbon at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefbon at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Stef Bon <stefbon at gmail.com> --- I agree with others: xattr support

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Damien Miller <djm at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- What a pity... it seemed to be something quite useful for many cases. AFAIU, the only reason not to support it was staying at the base level of the sftp "standard"... however, OpenSSH goes in so many places way beyond the standards... -- You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Especially since Eberhard's patch doesn't them *that* intrusive to other parts of openssh, wouldn't simply be possible to use something like RFC 2389,... so server and client could negotiate whether things beyond the basic features are supported and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release

Sorry to repost, but I finally have the code on a machine that has diff -u, and I've updated it for 2.9p2. Attached is the unified diff to add logging of SFTP activity to auth.info. If there is a more proper way to contrib patches, please let me know. Cheers, Jason # "Jason A. Dour" <jason at dour.org> http://dour.org/ # Founder / Executive Producer - PJ

Hello trusty rsync list, I'm excited about --fake-super as it will replace too much work with none at all. I have gotten it to work under linux and I have a fair grasp with what is happening there. I have a problem, though, and that is, in the long term, I'll need to archive my Linux systems not to a Linux box, but to a Solaris 10 box. I understand that Solaris does have extended

Hello, This is probably a long email, but please bear with me. I plan to submit a patch and would like to explain what I will do before doing it so I don't lose time if there's some flaw in my plan. I currently use sshfs to mount directories from some computers and a NAS into other computers. I recently noticed that when copying some files from one computer into one of these sshfs

Hi, I am working on fuse4x (fuse for macosx) and sshfs. And I discovered a bug with sshfs when copying a link over sshfs is failed. It happens because sshfs tries to invoke SETSTAT on a link when target is not copied yet. I checked sshfs sources and found that it uses SSH_FXP_SETSTAT operation. https://github.com/fuse4x/sshfs/blob/master/sshfs.c#L2287 SSH_FXP_SETSTAT sets attributes to target

Hey list, Sorry for all the questions today. But I am trying to wrap up this ftp business and still having some issues. I appreciate your input. SELinux is temporarily disabled (until I can work this all out) and I am now able to log into the FTP server. [root at LCENT05:~] #/usr/bin/ftp localhost Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1). 220 FTP Server ready. Name (localhost:root): bluethundr

Hello list! Well I have delved back into my proftpd config in the hopes of resolving my issues and having a working server. :) I believe I have the passive mode issue that I was expereriencing last time mostly worked out. But there are still a couple of things going on with this config that I was hoping to run by you in hopes of finding a solution. If I execute an ftp session on localhost

> On Dec 3, 2007 5:19 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos at szeredi.hu> wrote: > > > Yes it is weird. I hope you can help me with this problem as sshfs is > > > so much simpler than nfs. > > > > Can you please do one more thing: start up sshfs normally, then on the > > server do a strace of the sftp-server process: > > > > strace -o /tmp/strace.log

Hello list, I was able to get passive mode worked out. I'm really glad I was able to do this. I'm able to log into the ftp server, list directories, enter subdirectories and upload/download files. However my next task is to enable virtual users using mysql. I have installed proftpd-mysql and enabled the sql modules in the config. I found a good article on how to do this here:

Hello list!! I am trying to setup very simple authentication for proftpd under centos 5.6. But for some reason it isn't working and I was hoping to get some advice into how to resolve the issue. Machine info: [code] [root at VIRTCENT07:~] #cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.6 (Final) [root at VIRTCENT07:~] #uname -a Linux VIRTCENT07 2.6.18-238.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Jan 13 17:49:40 EST

On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Damien Miller wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Damien Miller wrote: > >> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, mikep at noc.utoronto.ca wrote: >> >>> Re-testing 'openssh-SNAP-20150305' on Solaris 10, with 'gcc': >>> >>> Configure, 'make' complete; 'make tests' fails at: >>> >>> postcondition check

New to sshfs and new to this mailing list so please guide me if required. Is this a bug? When sshfs is given option -o rellinks, it responds with fuse: unknown option `rellinks' According to my understanding of the sshfs man page and --help output this option a) is valid and b) should be passed to the module, not to fuse. Versions: SSHFS version 2.4 FUSE library version: 2.8.5