similar to: [Bug 2526] New: Support for transparent proxying

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joel.lehtonen at iki.fi --- Comment #24 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- *** Bug 2526 has been

Dear Colleagues, I am trying to estimate several non-linear models simultaneously. I don't want to use non-linear mixed model, but non-linear model with same form, but it should be estimated separately according to variable group (I have lots of groups that have lots of observations....). I would like to have unique parameters for each group. e.g. something like this mod <- nls(y ~

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Summary: [PATCH] Transparent proxy support on Linux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

On 3/27/11 4:38 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all, > Please check out sources. Compile things. Report bugs. Etc. I'm not sure if this is useful as is, but attached is output of `make check` for llvm+clang, on a Tegra2 machine with ubuntu linux. The ocaml binding failures are due to the fact there is no ocamlopt on arm, even though there is ocaml/ocamlc, and the bindings compile

I've wondered if this topic has been discussed relative to enhancing the current capabilities of OpenSSH. Please forgive me if I don't use the exact terminology that you may be used to in describing SSH or Transparent Proxy operation. I continue to learn. Always... Here's what I mean: 1) Port forwarding through SSH is generally a configuration that is "port

Hello, Is it possible to produce machine code directly to memory buffer so that it could be called immediately? What I would like to do is something like this: Compiler: Scripting language (Antlr) -> LLVM IR -> (Optimization) -> Raw Machine code -> (Transport media) -> Execution The idea is that I could compile my scripts directly to asm without any extra steps and in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1930 --- Comment #12 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2011-09-06 10:34:21 EST --- Retarget unresolved

Hi, Is it possible to transparent proxy FTP through Squid? If so what rules would i need to add to the rules file so that any ftp request is forwarding through Squid? I have www traffic being Tranparantly proxied. Herwith my www rules: REDIRECT loc 3128 tcp 80 ACCEPT loc fw::3128 tcp www - all ACCEPT fw

When using LocalForward or DynamicForward sometimes the endpoint does no longer exist but I need to find out *which* endpoint exactly. For example: $ ssh -D 1234 server.example.net On the client, maybe in another terminal: $ curl --socks5-hostname localhost:1234 http://does-not-exist.local curl: (97) connection to proxy closed As expected. But on the server (OpenSSH 8.4), the following is

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:02:57AM -0700, S Bob wrote: > On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > If this is actually something you want to do with regularity, I > > suggest using the SSH SOCKS proxy (with the DynamicForward port), and > > configure Firefox to use the localhost:port as a SOCKS5 proxy. Then > > all traffic in firefox will be routed over the ssh

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2130 --- Comment #21 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to openssh-6.4 -- You are

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1077 Summary: Descriptions for "ssh -D" and DynamicForward should mention they can specify "bind_address" optionally Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority:

I love SSH's ability to dynamically forward ports using SOCKS (either -D or DynamicForward) (ie "ssh -D 1081 private.mine.net"). But the thing that has caused me some pain, is that only SOCKS4 is supported. The SOCKS4 proxy specification does not permit hostnames, but only IP addresses. This isn't much of a problem if the target host is a public Internet host or otherwise DNS

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3133 Bug ID: 3133 Summary: Dynamically Assigned Ports for DynamicForward and LocalForward Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Attached (and inline) is a patch to add the following config options: ControlBindMask ControlAllowUsers ControlAllowGroups ControlDenyUsers ControlDenyGroups It pulls the peer credential check from client_process_control() in ssh.c, and expounds upon it in a new function, client_control_grant(). Supplemental groups are not checked in this patch. I didn't feel comfortable taking a shot

On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:56:15PM +0000, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: >> If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote >> machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: >> ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine >> and

Hi, I'm considering patching Dovecot to work as a transparent (and virus scanning) IMAP proxy. What is the appropriate feature to extend? (I've considered the following: IMAPC and reverse proxying, with IMAPC looking more promising since it actually parses IMAP communication). Can anyone who is familiar with the IMAPC code recommend what are the most appropriate locations in the

Hi all, The good news: RC2 testing was successful in that it uncovered a bad regression from 2.8 (which existed in top-of-tree). It also showed that there was an unincorporated fix that needed to go into the clang branch. The bad news: I'm truncating the RC2 testing phase and announcing the RC3 testing phase. Hopefully, because we caught the bugs in time this phase won't impact the

Hiyas, currently the commandline that can be reached via ~C cannot create new DynamicForwards. This is a feature I really miss, therefore it would be nice, if it could be implemented, e.g. -D 12345 should open a new socks proxy on port 12345 on the local machine. Also I want to ask what the status on allowing additional a {Local,Remote,Dynamic}Forward using in combination with ControlMaster

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1708 |1803 --- Comment #10 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- We'll look at this for the next release.