Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2509] New: Unexpected change in tcpip-forward reply message in OpenSSH 6.8"
2006 Apr 19
1
tcpip-forward with port 0 and 'want reply'
RFC 4254 says, in regards to the "tcpip-forward" request message:
Section 7.1
...
If a client passes 0 as port number to bind and has 'want reply' as
TRUE, then the server allocates the next available unprivileged port
number and replies with the following message; otherwise, there is
no response-specific data.
byte SSH_MSG_REQUEST_SUCCESS
uint32 port that was bound
2000 Aug 15
0
Experimental -R support patch for openssh client
Hi !
Here's an experimental patch for openssh-2.1.1p4 to add support
(to openssh client) for -R (protocol 2).
So if you have access to a commercial ssh2 server (that allows port
forwardings) could you test this patch.
(Note the openssh server doesn't have support for -R with protocol 2 so
testing with openssh server won't do much good).
To test remember to use -o "Protocol
2011 Sep 08
1
Dynamic port remote listener - a BUG?
Hello,
Today I tried using "dynamically assigned" port for remote listener, by
requesting listener on port 0. This is supposed to create a listener on a
port choosen by server. Everything seemed OK (the choosen port was sent back
to client), but forwarding was refused. So I checked the source.
in channels.c, function: channel_setup_fwd_listener
/*
*
2000 Aug 23
1
Protocol 2 remote forwarding patch
Hi !
Here's a patch to add remote port forwarding support (protocol 2) for
openssh. I have tried to test that it works like it should but a more
thorough testing is needed. This patch adds both client/server support.
The patch should be applied to openssh-2.1.1p4 source tree.
Also included is a PortForwarding sshd_config option, new ./configure
option --disable-forwarding that should make it
2001 Feb 10
3
Protocol 2 remote forwarding patch
Hi all,
I'm very new in this list, as looking for codes to plug up the lack of
functionality of "Protocol 2 Remote Forwardig".
Fortunately, I could find it in MARC's archive. Mr. Jarno Huuskonen
posted the codes in Sept, last year, and I tried applying it to my
FreeBSD box environment.
I couldn't apply an original patch, of course, for incompatibility of
virsion. The
2016 Jun 02
2
[PATCH] Link count attribute extension
Hello,
This patch adds client and server support for transmitting the st_nlink field
across SSH2_FXP_NAME and SSH2_FXP_ATTRS responses.
Please let me know if there anything I can do to improve this patch. I am
not subscribed to list so please CC me.
Index: sftp-common.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/sftp-common.c,v
retrieving
2020 Feb 06
2
Building libsk-libfido2.so?
I updated to the latest versions of libfido2 and openssh-portable tonight, with an intention to test out the security key functionality and look closely at the changes over the last couple of months to see if I need to change anything in my AsyncSSH implementation to stay in sync. However, it seems that libfido2 no longer provides the ?libsk-libfido2.so? library that it used to. That was something
2019 Dec 03
2
U2F support in OpenSSH HEAD
Hi Damien,
On Nov 14, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Damien Miller wrote:
>> As of this morning, OpenSSH now has experimental U2F/FIDO support, with
>> U2F being added as a new key type "sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 at openssh.com"
>> or "ecdsa-sk" for short (the "sk" stands for "security
2003 Aug 06
2
'cancel-tcpip-forward' is not supported.
Hi there,
I'm developing ssh client in pure java and, recently, I'm trying
to improve the port forwarding support on that stuff.
However, it seems to me that sshd of OpenSSH has not supported
'cancel-tcpip-forward' request.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-connect-17.txt
says that
| A port forwarding can be cancelled with the following message.
|
1998 May 18
1
DOS-Client with TCPIP and SAMBA
Hi there,
I have a client in a network using a samba-server that has to use MSDOS, because
some software running on it needs a clean DOS. I installed the DOS-Client for
TCPIP that is available from Microsoft V 1.0 and it works fine; the only thing
is, that it takes so much memory below 640 K, that another program also running
under DOS does not function correctly anymore. Maybe some of the
2016 Feb 23
0
Virtual ethernet delivers corrupt tcpip data
We came across this article recently. Does anyone know if libvirt-lxc
under CentOS 7 is impacted by this bug? It mentions that a fix for this
has been ported back as far as 3.14 kernels, but CentOS 7.1 is still
only at 3.10.
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/16/02/22/1715202/linux-virtual-ethernet-bug-delivers-corrupt-tcpip-data
2008 Oct 13
1
domU Windows XP tcpip.sys bluescreen
I am currently running Centos 5.2 with 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen with 2 domu's
One another Centos 5.2 and another Windows XP.
The Centos DomU works fine and I never have any problems however my XP DomU
crashes every so often with the bluescreen DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
then under the technical information tcpip.sys addres xxxxxx base at xxxxx
datetime Xxxxxxxxx
Is there a driver
2003 Nov 09
10
[Bug 756] sshd does not support global request cancel-tcpip-forward
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756
Summary: sshd does not support global request cancel-tcpip-
forward
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at
2008 Feb 15
4
About postgresql tcpip connection
hello everybody
i?m trying to connect to my postgresql via tcpip and it thow an error is not accepting tcp-ip connections
I ask to google but i dont find the solution, people said about the prostgresql.conf enable tcpip, I try but when i start the service it thow an error.
Other thing is add the option i to postmaster.opt but when i start the service this file is redefined
anybody can helpme
2004 Sep 26
0
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip
Fun, fun. I suggest checking the corresponding MTA configuration :)
Return-Path: <David.Bear@asu.edu>
Delivered-To: rohrbach@mail.webmonster.de
Received: (qmail 56434 invoked by uid 801); 24 Sep 2004 15:51:37 -0000
Delivered-To: vrohrbach-karsten@rohrbach.de
Received: (qmail 56429 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 15:51:36 -0000
Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (129.219.110.120)
by
2015 Aug 21
124
[Bug 2451] New: Bugs intended to be fixed in 7.2
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2451
Bug ID: 2451
Summary: Bugs intended to be fixed in 7.2
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: Miscellaneous
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2008 Mar 17
1
update_call_counter: Call to peer '2509' rejected due to usage limit of 1?
Hi,
I am using asterisk-1.4.15, My sip configs is like
[2501]
type=friend
username=2501
secret=2501
canreinvite=no
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
context = sip
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
incominglimit=1
nat=1
queue.conf is like
[gen-enq]
joinempty = yes
musiconhold = default
strategy = rrmemory
servicelevel = 60
timeout = 60
retry = 5
wrapuptime=5
announce-frequency = 90
announce-holdtime = yes
2011 Nov 23
1
Corosync init-script broken on CentOS6
Hello all,
I am trying to create a corosync/pacemaker cluster using CentOS 6.0.
However, I'm having a great deal of difficulty doing so.
Corosync has a valid configuration file and an authkey has been generated.
When I run /etc/init.d/corosync I see that only corosync is started.
>From experience working with corosync/pacemaker before, I know that
this is not enough to have a functioning
2018 Jul 05
3
trying to resurrect discussion about "Cannot signal a process over a channel (rfc 4254, section 6.9)"
> At one point, I had wondered about separating out the client and server
> support as well. At first glance, that would seem to help move things
> forward and would address most of the reported use cases. However, I
> have some users who would need the client support as well.
>
> I suspect that adding the server support first might be a problem for
> the developers. Such a
2018 Jul 05
2
trying to resurrect discussion about "Cannot signal a process over a channel (rfc 4254, section 6.9)"
Hi everybody
I?d like to resurrect the discussion on a known issue with the openssh server, regarding signal delivery as described in rfc4254
This has been originally reported about ten years ago in this thread:
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424
I am taking he liberty to copy a few people who contributed that thread over time
The discussion does not seem to expose the reasons