similar to: [Bug 1844] Explicit file permissions enhancement to sftp-server

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2547|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> ---

On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 08:06 +0200, Markus Friedl wrote: > I had something in mind like this for years, but with slightly > different steps: > My naive approach would be to keep the scp user interface and switch > to the sftp protocol internally. We could add a -M [scp|sftp] option > to scp and select the internal protocol. Later we switch the default > from scp to sftp. > No

Hi Jakub, Sorry for the late reply. I was off from work for a few days. I?ve tried to add the noexec, nosuid and nodev mount options but it seems to have some difficulties to do so with kubernetes nfs-mount. I?ll keep trying to resolve it anyway. The patch you pasted is exactly the thing I wanna have. I think it?s super useful and I definitely vote yes for merging it to master. I was actually

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 Summary: Explicit file permissions enhancement to sftp-server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sftp-server AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 eb <email.bug at arcor.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |email.bug at arcor.de --- Comment #10 from eb <email.bug at arcor.de> --- Instead of patching in yet another

I conjecture that only few of the existing use cases rely on remote expansion. In any case (no pun intended), IMHO it would be better to break a few of the current use cases but leave the majority functional - than kill scp for all. Regards, Uri > On Aug 3, 2020, at 02:50, Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> wrote: > > ?On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 00:17 +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 drzraf <raphael.droz+floss at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |raphael.droz+floss at gmail.co | |m -- You are receiving this

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 leon at heess.me changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leon at heess.me --- Comment #8 from leon at heess.me --- Please do add this feature! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 Gabriel <redimido at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redimido at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Gabriel <redimido at gmail.com> --- It is 2020 and this is still

scp may be an ugly protocol, but it works, works nicely from a command line, and is quite convenient. FTP (and, presumably, sftp) is not nearly as convenient. Why do you think your recommendation to "use sftp instead" keeps falling on the deaf ear? Usability, perhaps? Perhaps it's time to stop preaching to people about what they should use, but instead - if you really want a change

On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 16:00 +1030, David Newall wrote: > On 05/01/18 02:44, Thomas G?ttler wrote: > > I set up a chroot sftp server [...] > > Is there a way to get both? > > > > - chroot > > > > - writable root > > The source code (sftpd.c) seems to require that the root directory > be > owned by root and not group or world writable, so I

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1768 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjelen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> --- Created attachment 2523

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED CC| |jjelen at redhat.com Resolution|FIXED

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjelen at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> --- Created attachment 2647

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED CC| |jjelen

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjelen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> --- This is related to the bug

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1940 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjelen at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> --- (In reply to Damien Miller

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1402 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2085|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #2086|0 |1 is

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1644 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1693|0 |1 is obsolete| | CC| |jjelen at

Thanks Jakub. How does this patch match the OpenSSH source version? Does the patch only applicable to OpenSSH version 6.6.1, or does other version available as well? Thanks. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 12/04/2015 03:26 AM, security veteran wrote: > >> 3. Is there a way to re-compile OpenSSH by turning on/off some flags