similar to: [Bug 2340] New: Openssh issue: unable to ssh the solaris server from ldap users

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[Bug 2340] New: Openssh issue: unable to ssh the solaris server from ldap users"

2006 Jul 10
1
OpenSSH 4.3p2 on Solaris 10 and PAM
Hi, We have a Solaris 10 system that authanticates users against an LDAP server with password management. On port 22 runs Sun SSH 1.1. On port 2222 runs OpenSSH 4.3p2. OpenSSH uses a configuration from a Linux system where login with password or public key works. Adittionally we have a customized PAM module that grants/revokes access based upon an attribute setting in LDAP. The PAM
2007 Aug 14
2
OpenSSH public key problem with Solaris 10 and LDAP users?
Hello. I've got a problem logging in to a Sparc Solaris 10 machine with public key authentication. I searched, and found a similar problem report at <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openssh.devel/12694>. For that guy, the problem had to do with LDAP. My user accounts are also stored in LDAP, an OpenLDAP server, to be exact. That server runs on the same machine as the machine
2004 Aug 06
1
Internet Streaming
As of now, I can broadcast my stream to my school's local netowrk, but how can I extend it to the "real internet" so people outside of my school's domain can hear it ? <p><p><p>_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives:
2005 Feb 24
2
FTP specific port forwarding
Hi I've been looking at a both openssh and couple of commercial SSH implementations(F-Secure and ssh comm.). The one thing I see as missing is the "nice-to-have" feature of FTP specific port forwarding. The commercial implementations allows a syntax of "-L ftp/<someport>:..." which does some "automagical" forwarding of the data channel "under the
2015 May 14
1
[Bug 2399] New: openssh server should fatal out when pam_setcred and pam_open_session fail
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2399 Bug ID: 2399 Summary: openssh server should fatal out when pam_setcred and pam_open_session fail Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.8p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5
2002 Jan 16
1
[Bug 65] TCP Wrappers support does not log successful connections
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65 ------- Additional Comments From jap3003+opensshbugs at ksu.edu 2002-01-17 03:14 ------- "should?" Maybe. "Does?" No. This is the way tcpd does it, too. The call to hosts_access() only determines whether or not a host should pass. refuse() [iirc, don't have the source handy] terminates sshd after calling syslog.
2007 Sep 06
1
openssh 4.6p1 closing connection with strange packet length
server is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86 (32bit) client is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86_64 (64bit) Just connecting from the client to the server and running "top" long enough results in: Disconnecting: Bad packet length 3690378913. This seems like a 32/64 bit problem to me. -- Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap at domdv.de
2023 Feb 28
2
add user failed check log
Good morning, On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 01:07 +0000, Coolvibes Reloaded wrote: > i'm trying to config the usr authentication > but when i goto add myself into the admin part > i get add user failed check log? > > so i did and i'm getting this > [...] > [2023-02-28 00:46:16] EROR auth_htpasswd/auth_htpasswd.c No filename > given in options for authenticator. >
2023 Feb 28
1
add user failed check log
i'm trying to config the usr authentication but when i goto add myself into the admin part i get add user failed check log? so i did and i'm getting this [2023-02-28 00:46:16] INFO admin/admin.c Received admin command manageauth.xsl on mount "/live.mp3" [2023-02-28 00:46:16] EROR auth_htpasswd/auth_htpasswd.c No filename given in options for authenticator. [2023-02-28
2007 May 17
2
Running SSL Rails app on apache server already in use
SSL and Rails is proving to be somewhat confusing and difficult to get going for me. I already have an HTTPS apache instance running off my domain -- legacy secure web app. (lives at https://www.mydomain.com say) Now I want to develop a new app on the same secured domain with rails (out of a subdir, symlinked or something at https://www.mydomain.com/railsapp ) But how can this work? To get that
2018 Feb 22
2
wiki content management via automation
On 21/02/18 22:30, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > That's a good question, as we'll also have to migration for moinmoin if > we can't find a support path to migrate to supported version anyway. > So first question (already asked on the list) : is there a way to get in > touch with moin people willing to help/assist us ? (as their upgrade > tool wasn't working to test
2016 Apr 11
2
discussions around upstream documentation
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/11/2016 09:18 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> What are the thoughts or concerns about this sort of workflow >> change? > > Any chance Moin Moin can store wiki source in git and sync > automatically with a central git repository?
2015 Oct 04
1
Main menu, CentOS Wiki
On 4 October 2015 at 17:49, Ilyas Arinov <arinov.ilyas at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry about second post about that, but we need language sensitive menu > links on wiki.centos.org. For example, if users pick any language and wants > to see HowTo section, they need open "Learn" section and find there "HowTo" > section, or add language code into every link from
2017 Dec 11
4
wiki.centos.org .. what's next ?
it's all in the title : what's next for wiki.centos.org ? As a reminder, current wiki.centos.org instance is powered by moinmoin (https://moinmo.in/) but quite an old version (moin-1.5.8-3.el6.noarch) Recently I had a quick look at trying to update/upgrade that version to something newer/supported, but it's a nightmare : the data conversion just kill the target server (oom) and no
2016 Apr 11
6
discussions around upstream documentation
There is a Fedora Activity Day (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Documentation_2016 ) centered around documentation, where I'm going to see what can be done about the state of centos documentation from upstream sources. Most of the tooling for documentation for these two groups is centered around git. For the most part, our documentation currently lives in the wiki, and has a fairly high
2018 Feb 21
2
wiki content management via automation
Hi the CentOS Cloud images and other things are now built from end to end automated pipelines, but the wiki content corresponding to them isnt. Is there something that can be used to do this automation ? I have done some stuff many many years ago, via directly mangling content on the wiki objects, but that might not be the best way forward. thoughts ? Regards -- Karanbir Singh
2015 Oct 04
4
Main menu, CentOS Wiki
Sorry about second post about that, but we need language sensitive menu links on wiki.centos.org. For example, if users pick any language and wants to see HowTo section, they need open "Learn" section and find there "HowTo" section, or add language code into every link from menu bar. We should solve this. Can someone help? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
2009 Feb 09
2
Nice work Alain
Hey Alain, Nice work on the updated admonitions here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Wiki/Editing IMHO they look great, and a nice improvement on the previous set. Thanks for the hard work making our wiki pages look great! Ned
2014 Sep 03
7
Testing Wiki migration - asking for testers
Hi nice people interested in CentOS Docs and wiki ! There were already threads about migrating the wiki to something else (mediawiki, $other), or staying with moinmoin (what we now have in place). This mail isn't about that thread (but feel free to start a new one about that possible migration or not), but about just migrating the current moinmoin instance from the current machine to a new
2017 Dec 12
1
wiki.centos.org .. what's next ?
On 12/12/17 17:25, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org > <mailto:arrfab at centos.org>> wrote: > > it's all in the title : what's next for wiki.centos.org > <http://wiki.centos.org> ? > > As a reminder, current wiki.centos.org <http://wiki.centos.org> > instance is