similar to: Identify multiple users doing reverse port FWD with their pubkeys

Hi Jochen, On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 00:16, Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > On 02/11/2020 07:07 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote: > > - I have X devices (around 30) and one SSH server > > - Each of them have a unique public key and create one dynamic reverse > > port forwarding on the server > > - All of them connect with the same UNIX user (I don't

Hi folks, Since Docker can bind-mount every .ssh directory I am looking for some way to forbid unprotected private keys. AFAICS it is currently not possible on the sshd to verify that the peer's private key was protected by a passphrase. Can you confirm? Regards Harri

As far as I can tell, there currently isn't a straightforward way to use password authentication for connecting to hosts where the host key changes frequently. I realize this is a fairly niche use case, but when developing software for devices that often get reimaged (resulting in a host key change), it can get pretty tedious to attempt to connect, get a warning, remove the old host key via

On 05/16/2018 06:07 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 15 May 2018 at 22:43 Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is possible to implement and end-to-end encryption with dovecot, where >> server-side there is no private key to decrypt messages? > > You could probably automate this with sieve and e.g. GnuPG, which would mean > that all your

Christian Weisgerber <naddy at mips.inka.de> writes: > On 2020-01-12, Dustin Lundquist <dustin at null-ptr.net> wrote: > >> I think the intended application is to proxy through a proxy host provided by the service provider. If SSH had a SNI like feature where a host identifier was passed in plain text during the initial connection. This way the user would just need to

On 25.04.24 17:15, openssh-unix-dev-request at mindrot.org digested: > Subject: how to block brute force attacks on reverse tunnels? > From: Steve Newcomb <srn at coolheads.com> > Date: 25.04.24, 17:14 > > For many years I've been running ssh reverse tunnels on portable Linux, > OpenWRT, Android etc. hosts so they can be accessed from a server whose > IP is stable

Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 03:16:00PM +0000, Jochen Bern wrote: > Out of interest: > 1. If an extended mechanism were to be implemented, which server pubkey > do you expect to be seen/stored/verified by the client? The proxy's > / v4 middlebox's, or the v6 backend's? Or would you require that all > server-side machines use the *same* host keypairs? I'd do

On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 15:57 +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > That was the original intent (and it's mentioned in RFC4419) however > each moduli file we ship (70-80 instances of 6 sizes) takes about 1 > cpu-month to generate on a lowish-power x86-64 machine. Most of it > is > parallelizable, but even then it'd likely take a few hours to > generate > one of each size. I

Hi, Is it possible to configure Dovecot to reject mail that is not encrypted. In other words: 1. If the user tries to send an unencrypted message from their MUA, the server rejects it. 2. If a third-party tries to send an unencrypted message to the user, the server rejects it. The end result would be that no mail stored on the server can be decrypted by the administrator. I am aware that: *

Hello everyone, I work in a setting where remote logins are usually authenticated with SSH user keypairs, but many target accounts need to have a password set nonetheless (to use with sudo, log in via remote KVM, etc.) and cannot be put under a central user administration like LDAP. Enter a corporate password policy that requires passwords to be complex, different everywhere, and of limited

Hello, I have asked on the postfix mailing list for a solution, how to encrypt incoming emails with public gpg key My original idea was to use a smtpd-milter, which would encrypt all incoming plaintext messages of given user, using the users public gpg key. This way, it would look as if the original sender has sent the message encrypted. Somebody suggested this might be better done in Dovecot,

Given the following: mailboxes: user1 at example1.com user2 at example1.com user3 at example1.com etc. aliases: whatever at example1.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example2.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example3.com -> user1 at example1.com Now the problem: example1.com MX goes elsewhere (doesn't point to this server anymore). Domains example2.com and

On 05.07.23 18:01, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote: > It appears the forced command either does not run or runs to completion > and exits immediately, as there is no process named "receive.ksh" in > the process tree. FWIW, two cents of mine: -- The script *exiting* should *not* prompt sshd to execute the requested subsystem "as a second thought", or else it'd happen

Hi. Looks like every ~2 Years raises someone the question about SNI support in the openssh client. 2015: https://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=143248436518985&w=2 2017: https://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=150204655205911&w=2 I have read the docs and haven't seen anything about that this feature is already available in SSH. https://man.openbsd.org/ssh.1

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:11:45 +0100 Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > On 11/17/2016 08:48 AM, Steve Litt wrote: > > When I use an email client, its purpose is as a window into my > > Dovecot IMAP, and as a mechanism to reply to and send emails. I > > don't do filtering or calendaring on my email client (filtering via > > procmail direct to

Hello, given a small organization. There are *personal* mailboxes (mailbox per user, incl. subfolders et cetera). The users can share specic folders via the ACL (we call it "other users/", Dovecot calls it "shared" folder. Additionally there are mailboxes Dovecot calls "public" (we use the term "groups/"). They are not associated with a specific account,

Hi to all I was looking at protonmail.com Is possible to implement and end-to-end encryption with dovecot, where server-side there is no private key to decrypt messages? If I understood properly, on protonmail the private key is encrypted with user's password, so that only an user is able to decrypt the mailbox. Anything similiar ?

On 06.07.23 23:37, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote:> So changing the forced command as stated will break the application. I > would need to create a test bed to simulate the listener rather than > use the server as is, where is. That may produce false or misleading > results. Since the forced command is tied to the specific keypair in the authorized_keys, you could -- test with a different

On 05.07.23 02:50, Damien Miller wrote: > Some possibilities: > 1. the receive.ksh script is faulty in some way that causes it to invoke > sftp-server How would the script even *know* that the client requested the SFTP subsystem? Is a subsystem's executable/path, supposedly internally overwritten with the forced command at that point, exposed through $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND ?

Hi all, When I use an email client, its purpose is as a window into my Dovecot IMAP, and as a mechanism to reply to and send emails. I don't do filtering or calendaring on my email client (filtering via procmail direct to Dovecot). What email clients are all of you using to look at your IMAP email? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own