similar to: Openssl 3.0 Alpha

So far on FreeBSD 11.1 reject openssl 1.1.0 make with Openssl 1.0.2 l no issues Attempt to test in openssl 1.0.2m -dev -fips chokes on tests. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Talk

This might be trivial or not. I have a customer access his e-mail via POP3 using multiple devs. I recommend they switch to IMAP , however, How can the POP3 locking be made into a non-issue? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!

Is 2 factor authentication possible on dovecot? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b New Brunswick Save The PRovince Vote Liberal 14 Sept!!

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 03:13:28PM -0400, Randall S. Becker wrote: > On September 20, 2020 2:02 AM, Damien Miller wrote: > > OpenSSH 8.4p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing > > on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. > > I will be testing this shortly on HPE NonStop platforms. > > Side question: We now have

Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This person tends to move their e-mails to certain folers. On Thunderbird, the move shows. Not on Outlook. Any explanation? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b A

Anyone trying openssl 3 against openssh? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Put more trust in nobility of character than in an oath. -Solon

Hi, On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 05:54:52AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > The best solution is if (LIBRESSL) || (OPENSSL < 1010...) > > Else > > Whatever. > > Is that too much work? Littering code with #ifdef is almost never a good idea. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > wrote: > > > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security > > information, so here it is repeated for both releases: > > > > 2.3.4.1 > > > >

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > wrote: > > > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security > > information, so here it is repeated for both releases: > > > > 2.3.4.1 > > > >

pull the patches from the port..... On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:28 PM Odhiambo Washington via dovecot < dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > Oh, so manual compile should NOT work and it's okay or am I missing > something? > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 23:26, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:45:06AM +0300, Sami Ketola wrote: > > > > On 7. Jul 2020, at 0.48, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This person tends to move > > their e-mails to certain folers. On Thunderbird, the move shows. > > Not on Outlook. > > > > Any

I am trying to get this correct. ---------------- configuration ------------ # 2.0.0: dovecot.conf auth_cache_negative_ttl = 3600 s base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/ disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_uid = 100 info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot-info.log log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log listen = * login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lip=%l %c mail_debug=yes mail_location =

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 17:18 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > Fedora has the same policy, and so far has opted to ship a ~3600- > > line > > patch to OpenSSH to use the 1.1 API. > > Frankly, i would feel uncomfortable using OpenSSH on Fedora. Thank you for the support. Do you have any real reason to say so? Yes, we opted to improve existing patch, implement missing parts,

the patches are already in git master. I've pulled them into the mail/dovecot port. The dovecot guys/gals will release it eventually, but the port works TODAY. On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:33 PM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote: > I have always been able to compile manually, even from RCs so I believe I > should be able to compile from the tarball as well. >

2.3.4 had the same compile issues.... On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:44 PM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote: > Noted. > > I will wait for dovecot-2.3.4.2 tarball then. > > In all the servers I listed (+2 more), I never use the mail/dovecot port. > > I rely on mail/dovecot port on my own prototype (FreeBSD 12) which I have > built in preparation for the

On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 04:02:27PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 15:29, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.4.tar.gz > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.4.tar.gz.sig > > Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ > > > > * The default postmaster_address is now

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Did I say so? It's known issue and will be fixed in future release. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 05 February 2019 at 22:27

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Martin Hecht wrote: > all tests passed on > > Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS and > Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon) > > On SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP3 LTSS I had to provide a local > installation of a newer openssl. I have chosen their current LTS version > 1.0.2l with shared library support enabled, and I had to tweak with > CFLAGS and LDFLAGS

Oh, so manual compile should NOT work and it's okay or am I missing something? On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 23:26, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot > wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Due to

Oh, so manual compile should NOT work and it's okay or am I missing something? On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 23:26, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot > wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Due to